Cargando…

Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring

We designed and evaluated an active sampling device, using as analytical targets a family of pesticides purported to contribute to honeybee colony collapse disorder. Simultaneous sampling of bulk water and pore water was accomplished using a low-flow, multi-channel pump to deliver water to an array...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Supowit, Samuel D., Roll, Isaac B., Dang, Viet D., Kroll, Kevin J., Denslow, Nancy D., Halden, Rolf U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4764808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26905924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21886
_version_ 1782417441429651456
author Supowit, Samuel D.
Roll, Isaac B.
Dang, Viet D.
Kroll, Kevin J.
Denslow, Nancy D.
Halden, Rolf U.
author_facet Supowit, Samuel D.
Roll, Isaac B.
Dang, Viet D.
Kroll, Kevin J.
Denslow, Nancy D.
Halden, Rolf U.
author_sort Supowit, Samuel D.
collection PubMed
description We designed and evaluated an active sampling device, using as analytical targets a family of pesticides purported to contribute to honeybee colony collapse disorder. Simultaneous sampling of bulk water and pore water was accomplished using a low-flow, multi-channel pump to deliver water to an array of solid-phase extraction cartridges. Analytes were separated using either liquid or gas chromatography, and analysis was performed using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Achieved recoveries of fipronil and degradates in water spiked to nominal concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/L ranged from 77 ± 12 to 110 ± 18%. Method detection limits (MDLs) were as low as 0.040–0.8 ng/L. Extraction and quantitation of total fiproles at a wastewater-receiving wetland yielded concentrations in surface water and pore water ranging from 9.9 ± 4.6 to 18.1 ± 4.6 ng/L and 9.1 ± 3.0 to 12.6 ± 2.1 ng/L, respectively. Detected concentrations were statistically indistinguishable from those determined by conventional, more laborious techniques (p > 0.2 for the three most abundant fiproles). Aside from offering time-averaged sampling capabilities for two phases simultaneously with picogram-per-liter MDLs, the novel methodology eliminates the need for water and sediment transport via in situ solid phase extraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4764808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47648082016-03-01 Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring Supowit, Samuel D. Roll, Isaac B. Dang, Viet D. Kroll, Kevin J. Denslow, Nancy D. Halden, Rolf U. Sci Rep Article We designed and evaluated an active sampling device, using as analytical targets a family of pesticides purported to contribute to honeybee colony collapse disorder. Simultaneous sampling of bulk water and pore water was accomplished using a low-flow, multi-channel pump to deliver water to an array of solid-phase extraction cartridges. Analytes were separated using either liquid or gas chromatography, and analysis was performed using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Achieved recoveries of fipronil and degradates in water spiked to nominal concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/L ranged from 77 ± 12 to 110 ± 18%. Method detection limits (MDLs) were as low as 0.040–0.8 ng/L. Extraction and quantitation of total fiproles at a wastewater-receiving wetland yielded concentrations in surface water and pore water ranging from 9.9 ± 4.6 to 18.1 ± 4.6 ng/L and 9.1 ± 3.0 to 12.6 ± 2.1 ng/L, respectively. Detected concentrations were statistically indistinguishable from those determined by conventional, more laborious techniques (p > 0.2 for the three most abundant fiproles). Aside from offering time-averaged sampling capabilities for two phases simultaneously with picogram-per-liter MDLs, the novel methodology eliminates the need for water and sediment transport via in situ solid phase extraction. Nature Publishing Group 2016-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4764808/ /pubmed/26905924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21886 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Supowit, Samuel D.
Roll, Isaac B.
Dang, Viet D.
Kroll, Kevin J.
Denslow, Nancy D.
Halden, Rolf U.
Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring
title Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring
title_full Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring
title_fullStr Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring
title_short Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring
title_sort active sampling device for determining pollutants in surface and pore water – the in situ sampler for biphasic water monitoring
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4764808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26905924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21886
work_keys_str_mv AT supowitsamueld activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring
AT rollisaacb activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring
AT dangvietd activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring
AT krollkevinj activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring
AT denslownancyd activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring
AT haldenrolfu activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring