Cargando…
Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring
We designed and evaluated an active sampling device, using as analytical targets a family of pesticides purported to contribute to honeybee colony collapse disorder. Simultaneous sampling of bulk water and pore water was accomplished using a low-flow, multi-channel pump to deliver water to an array...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4764808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26905924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21886 |
_version_ | 1782417441429651456 |
---|---|
author | Supowit, Samuel D. Roll, Isaac B. Dang, Viet D. Kroll, Kevin J. Denslow, Nancy D. Halden, Rolf U. |
author_facet | Supowit, Samuel D. Roll, Isaac B. Dang, Viet D. Kroll, Kevin J. Denslow, Nancy D. Halden, Rolf U. |
author_sort | Supowit, Samuel D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We designed and evaluated an active sampling device, using as analytical targets a family of pesticides purported to contribute to honeybee colony collapse disorder. Simultaneous sampling of bulk water and pore water was accomplished using a low-flow, multi-channel pump to deliver water to an array of solid-phase extraction cartridges. Analytes were separated using either liquid or gas chromatography, and analysis was performed using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Achieved recoveries of fipronil and degradates in water spiked to nominal concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/L ranged from 77 ± 12 to 110 ± 18%. Method detection limits (MDLs) were as low as 0.040–0.8 ng/L. Extraction and quantitation of total fiproles at a wastewater-receiving wetland yielded concentrations in surface water and pore water ranging from 9.9 ± 4.6 to 18.1 ± 4.6 ng/L and 9.1 ± 3.0 to 12.6 ± 2.1 ng/L, respectively. Detected concentrations were statistically indistinguishable from those determined by conventional, more laborious techniques (p > 0.2 for the three most abundant fiproles). Aside from offering time-averaged sampling capabilities for two phases simultaneously with picogram-per-liter MDLs, the novel methodology eliminates the need for water and sediment transport via in situ solid phase extraction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4764808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47648082016-03-01 Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring Supowit, Samuel D. Roll, Isaac B. Dang, Viet D. Kroll, Kevin J. Denslow, Nancy D. Halden, Rolf U. Sci Rep Article We designed and evaluated an active sampling device, using as analytical targets a family of pesticides purported to contribute to honeybee colony collapse disorder. Simultaneous sampling of bulk water and pore water was accomplished using a low-flow, multi-channel pump to deliver water to an array of solid-phase extraction cartridges. Analytes were separated using either liquid or gas chromatography, and analysis was performed using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Achieved recoveries of fipronil and degradates in water spiked to nominal concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/L ranged from 77 ± 12 to 110 ± 18%. Method detection limits (MDLs) were as low as 0.040–0.8 ng/L. Extraction and quantitation of total fiproles at a wastewater-receiving wetland yielded concentrations in surface water and pore water ranging from 9.9 ± 4.6 to 18.1 ± 4.6 ng/L and 9.1 ± 3.0 to 12.6 ± 2.1 ng/L, respectively. Detected concentrations were statistically indistinguishable from those determined by conventional, more laborious techniques (p > 0.2 for the three most abundant fiproles). Aside from offering time-averaged sampling capabilities for two phases simultaneously with picogram-per-liter MDLs, the novel methodology eliminates the need for water and sediment transport via in situ solid phase extraction. Nature Publishing Group 2016-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4764808/ /pubmed/26905924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21886 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Supowit, Samuel D. Roll, Isaac B. Dang, Viet D. Kroll, Kevin J. Denslow, Nancy D. Halden, Rolf U. Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring |
title | Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring |
title_full | Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring |
title_fullStr | Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed | Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring |
title_short | Active Sampling Device for Determining Pollutants in Surface and Pore Water – the In Situ Sampler for Biphasic Water Monitoring |
title_sort | active sampling device for determining pollutants in surface and pore water – the in situ sampler for biphasic water monitoring |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4764808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26905924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21886 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT supowitsamueld activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring AT rollisaacb activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring AT dangvietd activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring AT krollkevinj activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring AT denslownancyd activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring AT haldenrolfu activesamplingdevicefordeterminingpollutantsinsurfaceandporewatertheinsitusamplerforbiphasicwatermonitoring |