Cargando…
A curative regimen would decrease HIV prevalence but not HIV incidence unless targeted to an ART-naïve population
HIV curative strategies currently under development aim to eradicate latent provirus, or prevent viral replication, progression to AIDS, and transmission. The impact of implementing curative programs on HIV epidemics has not been considered. We developed a mathematical model of heterosexual HIV tran...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4764923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26908162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22183 |
_version_ | 1782417465204015104 |
---|---|
author | Dimitrov, Dobromir T. Kiem, Hans-Peter Jerome, Keith R. Johnston, Christine Schiffer, Joshua T. |
author_facet | Dimitrov, Dobromir T. Kiem, Hans-Peter Jerome, Keith R. Johnston, Christine Schiffer, Joshua T. |
author_sort | Dimitrov, Dobromir T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | HIV curative strategies currently under development aim to eradicate latent provirus, or prevent viral replication, progression to AIDS, and transmission. The impact of implementing curative programs on HIV epidemics has not been considered. We developed a mathematical model of heterosexual HIV transmission to evaluate the independent and synergistic impact of ART, HIV prevention interventions and cure on HIV prevalence and incidence. The basic reproduction number was calculated to study the potential for the epidemic to be eliminated. We explored scenarios with and without the assumption that patients enrolled into HIV cure programs need to be on antiretroviral treatment (ART). In our simulations, curative regimes had limited impact on HIV incidence if only ART patients were eligible for cure. Cure implementation had a significant impact on HIV incidence if ART-untreated patients were enrolled directly into cure programs. Concurrent HIV prevention programs moderately decreased the percent of ART treated or cured patients needed to achieve elimination. We project that widespread implementation of HIV cure would decrease HIV prevalence under all scenarios but would only lower rate of new infections if ART-untreated patients were targeted. Current efforts to identify untreated HIV patients will gain even further relevance upon availability of an HIV cure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4764923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47649232016-03-02 A curative regimen would decrease HIV prevalence but not HIV incidence unless targeted to an ART-naïve population Dimitrov, Dobromir T. Kiem, Hans-Peter Jerome, Keith R. Johnston, Christine Schiffer, Joshua T. Sci Rep Article HIV curative strategies currently under development aim to eradicate latent provirus, or prevent viral replication, progression to AIDS, and transmission. The impact of implementing curative programs on HIV epidemics has not been considered. We developed a mathematical model of heterosexual HIV transmission to evaluate the independent and synergistic impact of ART, HIV prevention interventions and cure on HIV prevalence and incidence. The basic reproduction number was calculated to study the potential for the epidemic to be eliminated. We explored scenarios with and without the assumption that patients enrolled into HIV cure programs need to be on antiretroviral treatment (ART). In our simulations, curative regimes had limited impact on HIV incidence if only ART patients were eligible for cure. Cure implementation had a significant impact on HIV incidence if ART-untreated patients were enrolled directly into cure programs. Concurrent HIV prevention programs moderately decreased the percent of ART treated or cured patients needed to achieve elimination. We project that widespread implementation of HIV cure would decrease HIV prevalence under all scenarios but would only lower rate of new infections if ART-untreated patients were targeted. Current efforts to identify untreated HIV patients will gain even further relevance upon availability of an HIV cure. Nature Publishing Group 2016-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4764923/ /pubmed/26908162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22183 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Dimitrov, Dobromir T. Kiem, Hans-Peter Jerome, Keith R. Johnston, Christine Schiffer, Joshua T. A curative regimen would decrease HIV prevalence but not HIV incidence unless targeted to an ART-naïve population |
title | A curative regimen would decrease HIV prevalence but not HIV incidence unless targeted to an ART-naïve population |
title_full | A curative regimen would decrease HIV prevalence but not HIV incidence unless targeted to an ART-naïve population |
title_fullStr | A curative regimen would decrease HIV prevalence but not HIV incidence unless targeted to an ART-naïve population |
title_full_unstemmed | A curative regimen would decrease HIV prevalence but not HIV incidence unless targeted to an ART-naïve population |
title_short | A curative regimen would decrease HIV prevalence but not HIV incidence unless targeted to an ART-naïve population |
title_sort | curative regimen would decrease hiv prevalence but not hiv incidence unless targeted to an art-naïve population |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4764923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26908162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dimitrovdobromirt acurativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation AT kiemhanspeter acurativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation AT jeromekeithr acurativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation AT johnstonchristine acurativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation AT schifferjoshuat acurativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation AT dimitrovdobromirt curativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation AT kiemhanspeter curativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation AT jeromekeithr curativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation AT johnstonchristine curativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation AT schifferjoshuat curativeregimenwoulddecreasehivprevalencebutnothivincidenceunlesstargetedtoanartnaivepopulation |