Cargando…
Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation
BACKGROUND: The spread of early detection and the improvement of cancer treatment have led to an increased prevalence of cancer survivors, including in the working age population. Return-to-work (RTW) of cancer survivors has become a key issue for national cancer control plans. This study aims (1) t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4765094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26912175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0210-z |
_version_ | 1782417498843381760 |
---|---|
author | Kiasuwa Mbengi, Régine Otter, Renée Mortelmans, Katrien Arbyn, Marc Van Oyen, Herman Bouland, Catherine de Brouwer, Christophe |
author_facet | Kiasuwa Mbengi, Régine Otter, Renée Mortelmans, Katrien Arbyn, Marc Van Oyen, Herman Bouland, Catherine de Brouwer, Christophe |
author_sort | Kiasuwa Mbengi, Régine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The spread of early detection and the improvement of cancer treatment have led to an increased prevalence of cancer survivors, including in the working age population. Return-to-work (RTW) of cancer survivors has become a key issue for national cancer control plans. This study aims (1) to identify the factors that have an impact on RTW of cancer survivors and to draw a risk profile supporting health professionals in the screening of those at risk for barriers of RTW and (2) to sharpen these results with input from health, social security and academic Belgian experts and to provide evidence-based recommendations that facilitate RTW of cancer survivors. METHODS: A rapid review was conducted, based on the methodology elaborated by The Knowledge to Action Research Programme and researchers from the University of York, including a quality assessment of retained studies. Next, the Delphi method was used to organize a consultation with experts in order to discuss, validate and complement the results. RESULTS: Forty-three out of 1860 studies were included. We identified nine risk factors grouped into four categories: socio-demographic, disease and treatment-related, work-related, and personal and subjective factors. Experts suggested dividing them into two even groups: factors which are modifiable and those which are not. The awareness of health professionals regarding the identified factors, a better assessment of work capacities, clarity on the rights and obligations of employers and workers alike, and the setup of a positive discrimination employment policy for cancer survivors were acknowledged as factors facilitating RTW of cancer survivors. CONCLUSIONS: The awareness of health professionals regarding barriers of RTW may improve the early identification of cancer survivors at risk for prolonged time to RTW and may allow early supportive intervention. Social and employment policies should be better tailored to support both employers and cancer survivors in the RTW process, providing incentives to positively discriminate cancer survivors on prolonged sick leave. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0210-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4765094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47650942016-02-25 Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation Kiasuwa Mbengi, Régine Otter, Renée Mortelmans, Katrien Arbyn, Marc Van Oyen, Herman Bouland, Catherine de Brouwer, Christophe Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: The spread of early detection and the improvement of cancer treatment have led to an increased prevalence of cancer survivors, including in the working age population. Return-to-work (RTW) of cancer survivors has become a key issue for national cancer control plans. This study aims (1) to identify the factors that have an impact on RTW of cancer survivors and to draw a risk profile supporting health professionals in the screening of those at risk for barriers of RTW and (2) to sharpen these results with input from health, social security and academic Belgian experts and to provide evidence-based recommendations that facilitate RTW of cancer survivors. METHODS: A rapid review was conducted, based on the methodology elaborated by The Knowledge to Action Research Programme and researchers from the University of York, including a quality assessment of retained studies. Next, the Delphi method was used to organize a consultation with experts in order to discuss, validate and complement the results. RESULTS: Forty-three out of 1860 studies were included. We identified nine risk factors grouped into four categories: socio-demographic, disease and treatment-related, work-related, and personal and subjective factors. Experts suggested dividing them into two even groups: factors which are modifiable and those which are not. The awareness of health professionals regarding the identified factors, a better assessment of work capacities, clarity on the rights and obligations of employers and workers alike, and the setup of a positive discrimination employment policy for cancer survivors were acknowledged as factors facilitating RTW of cancer survivors. CONCLUSIONS: The awareness of health professionals regarding barriers of RTW may improve the early identification of cancer survivors at risk for prolonged time to RTW and may allow early supportive intervention. Social and employment policies should be better tailored to support both employers and cancer survivors in the RTW process, providing incentives to positively discriminate cancer survivors on prolonged sick leave. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0210-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4765094/ /pubmed/26912175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0210-z Text en © Kiasuwa Mbengi et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kiasuwa Mbengi, Régine Otter, Renée Mortelmans, Katrien Arbyn, Marc Van Oyen, Herman Bouland, Catherine de Brouwer, Christophe Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation |
title | Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation |
title_full | Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation |
title_fullStr | Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation |
title_short | Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation |
title_sort | barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4765094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26912175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0210-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiasuwambengiregine barriersandopportunitiesforreturntoworkofcancersurvivorstimeforactionrapidreviewandexpertconsultation AT otterrenee barriersandopportunitiesforreturntoworkofcancersurvivorstimeforactionrapidreviewandexpertconsultation AT mortelmanskatrien barriersandopportunitiesforreturntoworkofcancersurvivorstimeforactionrapidreviewandexpertconsultation AT arbynmarc barriersandopportunitiesforreturntoworkofcancersurvivorstimeforactionrapidreviewandexpertconsultation AT vanoyenherman barriersandopportunitiesforreturntoworkofcancersurvivorstimeforactionrapidreviewandexpertconsultation AT boulandcatherine barriersandopportunitiesforreturntoworkofcancersurvivorstimeforactionrapidreviewandexpertconsultation AT debrouwerchristophe barriersandopportunitiesforreturntoworkofcancersurvivorstimeforactionrapidreviewandexpertconsultation |