Cargando…

Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Acute Care Surgical Teams are responsible for emergent surgical patients, and as such require regular handover and coordination between different surgeons. Despite the recent emergence of this model of care, minimal research has been conducted on the quality of patient handover and no re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilsden, Richard, Moffat, Bradley, Knowles, Sarah, Parry, Neil, Leslie, Ken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4765098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26913056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0065-6
_version_ 1782417499794440192
author Hilsden, Richard
Moffat, Bradley
Knowles, Sarah
Parry, Neil
Leslie, Ken
author_facet Hilsden, Richard
Moffat, Bradley
Knowles, Sarah
Parry, Neil
Leslie, Ken
author_sort Hilsden, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute Care Surgical Teams are responsible for emergent surgical patients, and as such require regular handover and coordination between different surgeons. Despite the recent emergence of this model of care, minimal research has been conducted on the quality of patient handover and no research has attempted to determine the rate of clinical agreement or disagreement among surgeons participating in these teams. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out with our acute care surgical service at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2 to March 31 2012. At the conclusion of the daily morning handover, receiving surgeons were asked to indicate, on provided handover sheets, whether they agreed with the proposed management plan for each patient that was discussed. The specific aspects of care over which they disagreed were also described, and disagreements were classified a priori as major or minor. The primary outcome was the rate of disagreement over the handed over management plan. RESULTS: Six staff surgeons agreed to participate and a total of 417 unique patients were handed over during the study period. For the primary outcome, a total of 41 disagreements were recorded for a disagreement rate of 9.8 %. 15 of the 41 disagreements were classified as major, for a major disagreement rate of 3.6 %. Consultant to consultant disagreements were classified as major disagreements 63 % of the time, whereas consultant to resident disagreements were classified as major 31 % of the time (P = 0.217). On average, the age of patients for which a clinical disagreement occurred were older; 63 vs. 57 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the frequency of handovers in clinical practice, little research has been conducted to determine the rate of disagreement over patient management among surgeons participating working in academic centers. This study demonstrated that the rate of clinical disagreement is low among surgeons working in an tertiary care teaching hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4765098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47650982016-02-25 Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study Hilsden, Richard Moffat, Bradley Knowles, Sarah Parry, Neil Leslie, Ken World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Acute Care Surgical Teams are responsible for emergent surgical patients, and as such require regular handover and coordination between different surgeons. Despite the recent emergence of this model of care, minimal research has been conducted on the quality of patient handover and no research has attempted to determine the rate of clinical agreement or disagreement among surgeons participating in these teams. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out with our acute care surgical service at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2 to March 31 2012. At the conclusion of the daily morning handover, receiving surgeons were asked to indicate, on provided handover sheets, whether they agreed with the proposed management plan for each patient that was discussed. The specific aspects of care over which they disagreed were also described, and disagreements were classified a priori as major or minor. The primary outcome was the rate of disagreement over the handed over management plan. RESULTS: Six staff surgeons agreed to participate and a total of 417 unique patients were handed over during the study period. For the primary outcome, a total of 41 disagreements were recorded for a disagreement rate of 9.8 %. 15 of the 41 disagreements were classified as major, for a major disagreement rate of 3.6 %. Consultant to consultant disagreements were classified as major disagreements 63 % of the time, whereas consultant to resident disagreements were classified as major 31 % of the time (P = 0.217). On average, the age of patients for which a clinical disagreement occurred were older; 63 vs. 57 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the frequency of handovers in clinical practice, little research has been conducted to determine the rate of disagreement over patient management among surgeons participating working in academic centers. This study demonstrated that the rate of clinical disagreement is low among surgeons working in an tertiary care teaching hospital. BioMed Central 2016-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4765098/ /pubmed/26913056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0065-6 Text en © Hilsden et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hilsden, Richard
Moffat, Bradley
Knowles, Sarah
Parry, Neil
Leslie, Ken
Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study
title Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study
title_full Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study
title_short Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study
title_sort surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4765098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26913056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0065-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hilsdenrichard surgeonagreementatthetimeofhandoveraprospectivecohortstudy
AT moffatbradley surgeonagreementatthetimeofhandoveraprospectivecohortstudy
AT knowlessarah surgeonagreementatthetimeofhandoveraprospectivecohortstudy
AT parryneil surgeonagreementatthetimeofhandoveraprospectivecohortstudy
AT leslieken surgeonagreementatthetimeofhandoveraprospectivecohortstudy