Cargando…
Recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial – experiences with the gift of hindsight
BACKGROUND: Recruitment issues continue to impact a large number of trials. Sharing recruitment information is vital to supporting researchers to accurately predict recruitment and to manage the risk of poor recruitment during study design and implementation. The purpose of this article is to build...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4765210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26908117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1229-0 |
_version_ | 1782417519719481344 |
---|---|
author | Copeland, Robert J. Horspool, Kimberley Humphreys, Liam Scott, Emma |
author_facet | Copeland, Robert J. Horspool, Kimberley Humphreys, Liam Scott, Emma |
author_sort | Copeland, Robert J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruitment issues continue to impact a large number of trials. Sharing recruitment information is vital to supporting researchers to accurately predict recruitment and to manage the risk of poor recruitment during study design and implementation. The purpose of this article is to build on the knowledge available to researchers on recruiting to community-based trials. METHODS: A critical commentary of the recruitment challenges encountered during the Booster Study, a randomised controlled trial in which researchers investigated the effectiveness of a motivational interviewing style intervention on the maintenance of physical activity. An overview of recruitment is provided, as well as strategies employed to recruit prospective participants and possible barriers to recruitment. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-two people, 47 % of the original target, were recruited through mail-outs, with secondary recruitment pathways yielding no additional participants. The research team encountered problems with recontacting interested participants and providing study materials in non-English languages. A lower response rate to the mail-out and a greater number of non-contactable participants in the full study than in the pilot study resulted in a smaller pool of eligible participants from the brief intervention eligible for recruitment into the randomised controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS: Despite using widely accepted recruitment strategies and incorporating new recruitment tactics in response to challenges, the Booster Study investigators failed to randomise a sufficient number of participants. Recruitment in trials of community-based behavioural interventions may have different challenges than trials based on clinical or primary care pathways. Specific challenges posed by the complexity of the study design and problems with staffing and resources were exacerbated by the need to revise upwards the number of mailed invitations as a result of the pilot study. Researchers should ensure study design facilitates recruitment and consider the implications of changing recruitment on the operational aspects of the trial. Where possible, the impact of new strategies should be measured, and recruitment successes and challenges should be shared with those planning similar studies. ISRCTN56495859 (registered on 12 February 2009); NCT00836459 (registered on 3 February 2009). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4765210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47652102016-02-25 Recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial – experiences with the gift of hindsight Copeland, Robert J. Horspool, Kimberley Humphreys, Liam Scott, Emma Trials Commentary BACKGROUND: Recruitment issues continue to impact a large number of trials. Sharing recruitment information is vital to supporting researchers to accurately predict recruitment and to manage the risk of poor recruitment during study design and implementation. The purpose of this article is to build on the knowledge available to researchers on recruiting to community-based trials. METHODS: A critical commentary of the recruitment challenges encountered during the Booster Study, a randomised controlled trial in which researchers investigated the effectiveness of a motivational interviewing style intervention on the maintenance of physical activity. An overview of recruitment is provided, as well as strategies employed to recruit prospective participants and possible barriers to recruitment. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-two people, 47 % of the original target, were recruited through mail-outs, with secondary recruitment pathways yielding no additional participants. The research team encountered problems with recontacting interested participants and providing study materials in non-English languages. A lower response rate to the mail-out and a greater number of non-contactable participants in the full study than in the pilot study resulted in a smaller pool of eligible participants from the brief intervention eligible for recruitment into the randomised controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS: Despite using widely accepted recruitment strategies and incorporating new recruitment tactics in response to challenges, the Booster Study investigators failed to randomise a sufficient number of participants. Recruitment in trials of community-based behavioural interventions may have different challenges than trials based on clinical or primary care pathways. Specific challenges posed by the complexity of the study design and problems with staffing and resources were exacerbated by the need to revise upwards the number of mailed invitations as a result of the pilot study. Researchers should ensure study design facilitates recruitment and consider the implications of changing recruitment on the operational aspects of the trial. Where possible, the impact of new strategies should be measured, and recruitment successes and challenges should be shared with those planning similar studies. ISRCTN56495859 (registered on 12 February 2009); NCT00836459 (registered on 3 February 2009). BioMed Central 2016-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4765210/ /pubmed/26908117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1229-0 Text en © Copeland et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Copeland, Robert J. Horspool, Kimberley Humphreys, Liam Scott, Emma Recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial – experiences with the gift of hindsight |
title | Recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial – experiences with the gift of hindsight |
title_full | Recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial – experiences with the gift of hindsight |
title_fullStr | Recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial – experiences with the gift of hindsight |
title_full_unstemmed | Recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial – experiences with the gift of hindsight |
title_short | Recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial – experiences with the gift of hindsight |
title_sort | recruiting to a large-scale physical activity randomised controlled trial – experiences with the gift of hindsight |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4765210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26908117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1229-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT copelandrobertj recruitingtoalargescalephysicalactivityrandomisedcontrolledtrialexperienceswiththegiftofhindsight AT horspoolkimberley recruitingtoalargescalephysicalactivityrandomisedcontrolledtrialexperienceswiththegiftofhindsight AT humphreysliam recruitingtoalargescalephysicalactivityrandomisedcontrolledtrialexperienceswiththegiftofhindsight AT scottemma recruitingtoalargescalephysicalactivityrandomisedcontrolledtrialexperienceswiththegiftofhindsight AT recruitingtoalargescalephysicalactivityrandomisedcontrolledtrialexperienceswiththegiftofhindsight |