Cargando…

Prevalence of Scapular Dyskinesis in Overhead and Nonoverhead Athletes: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Scapular dyskinesis, or abnormal dynamic scapular control, is a condition that is commonly associated with shoulder pathology but is also present in asymptomatic individuals. Literature varies on whether it represents a cause or symptom of shoulder pathology, but it is believed to be a r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burn, Matthew B., McCulloch, Patrick C., Lintner, David M., Liberman, Shari R., Harris, Joshua D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
126
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4765819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115627608
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Scapular dyskinesis, or abnormal dynamic scapular control, is a condition that is commonly associated with shoulder pathology but is also present in asymptomatic individuals. Literature varies on whether it represents a cause or symptom of shoulder pathology, but it is believed to be a risk factor for further injury. Clinical identification focuses on visual observation and examination maneuvers. Treatment of altered scapular motion has been shown to improve shoulder symptoms. It is thought to be more common in overhead athletes due to their reliance on unilateral upper extremity function but the incidence within nonoverhead athletes is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: Overhead athletes will have a greater prevalence of scapular dyskinesis when compared with nonoverhead athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: After PROSPERO registration, a systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines through the PubMed database looking for studies published before October 2014. All studies containing the search terms scapular, scapulothoracic, dyskinesis, dyskinesia, shoulder athlete, or overhead athlete were included. Studies that did not include prevalence data for scapular dyskinesis were excluded. Study methodological quality was evaluated using the modified Coleman methodology score. Descriptive statistics and 2-proportion 2-tailed z-tests were used to compare the reported prevalence of scapular dyskinesis between overhead and nonoverhead athletes. RESULTS: Twelve studies were analyzed including 1401 athletes (1257 overhead and 144 nonoverhead; mean age, 24.4 ± 7.1 years; 78% men). All the studies were evidence level 2 (33%) or level 3 (67%). The reported prevalence of scapular dyskinesis was significantly (P < .0001) higher in overhead athletes (61%) compared with nonoverhead athletes (33%). CONCLUSION: Scapular dyskinesis was found to have a greater reported prevalence (61%) in overhead athletes compared with nonoverhead athletes (33%). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prevalence data for scapular dyskinesis are scarce within the literature. Information on the reported prevalence, laterality, and association with the dominant extremity will allow for better allocation of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Recognition and treatment will help athletes to optimize functional performance and decrease the risk of further shoulder injury.