Cargando…
Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy
PURPOSE: Early detection of colorectal cancer is key to full recovery. This urged governments to start population screening programs for colorectal cancer, often using flexible endoscopes. Flexible endoscopy is difficult to learn and time-consuming. Automation of flexible endoscopes may increase the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4766207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26450108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1301-3 |
_version_ | 1782417621505802240 |
---|---|
author | van der Stap, N. Rozeboom, E. D. Pullens, H. J. M. van der Heijden, F. Broeders, I. A. M. J. |
author_facet | van der Stap, N. Rozeboom, E. D. Pullens, H. J. M. van der Heijden, F. Broeders, I. A. M. J. |
author_sort | van der Stap, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Early detection of colorectal cancer is key to full recovery. This urged governments to start population screening programs for colorectal cancer, often using flexible endoscopes. Flexible endoscopy is difficult to learn and time-consuming. Automation of flexible endoscopes may increase the capacity for the screening programs. The goal of this pilot study is to investigate the clinical and technical feasibility of an assisting automated navigation algorithm for a colonoscopy procedure. METHODS: Automated navigation (lumen centralization) was implemented in a robotized system designed for conventional flexible endoscopes. Ten novice and eight expert users were asked to perform a diagnostic colonoscopy on a colon model twice: once using the conventional and once using the robotic system. Feasibility was evaluated using time and location data as measures of the system’s added value. RESULTS: Automated target centralization (ATC) was turned on by the novices for a median of 4.2 % of the time during insertion and 0.3 % during retraction. Experts turned ATC on for 4.0 % of the time during insertion and 11.6 % during retraction. Novices and experts showed comparable times to reach the cecum with the conventional or the robotic setup with ATC. CONCLUSION: The ATC algorithm combined with the robotized endoscope setup works in an experimental setup that closely resembles the clinical environment and is considered feasible, although ATC use was lower than expected. For novices, it was unclear whether the low usage was due to unfamiliarity with the system or because they did not need ATC. Experts used ATC also during the retraction phase of the procedure. This was an unexpected finding and may indicate an added value of the system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1301-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4766207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47662072016-04-04 Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy van der Stap, N. Rozeboom, E. D. Pullens, H. J. M. van der Heijden, F. Broeders, I. A. M. J. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Early detection of colorectal cancer is key to full recovery. This urged governments to start population screening programs for colorectal cancer, often using flexible endoscopes. Flexible endoscopy is difficult to learn and time-consuming. Automation of flexible endoscopes may increase the capacity for the screening programs. The goal of this pilot study is to investigate the clinical and technical feasibility of an assisting automated navigation algorithm for a colonoscopy procedure. METHODS: Automated navigation (lumen centralization) was implemented in a robotized system designed for conventional flexible endoscopes. Ten novice and eight expert users were asked to perform a diagnostic colonoscopy on a colon model twice: once using the conventional and once using the robotic system. Feasibility was evaluated using time and location data as measures of the system’s added value. RESULTS: Automated target centralization (ATC) was turned on by the novices for a median of 4.2 % of the time during insertion and 0.3 % during retraction. Experts turned ATC on for 4.0 % of the time during insertion and 11.6 % during retraction. Novices and experts showed comparable times to reach the cecum with the conventional or the robotic setup with ATC. CONCLUSION: The ATC algorithm combined with the robotized endoscope setup works in an experimental setup that closely resembles the clinical environment and is considered feasible, although ATC use was lower than expected. For novices, it was unclear whether the low usage was due to unfamiliarity with the system or because they did not need ATC. Experts used ATC also during the retraction phase of the procedure. This was an unexpected finding and may indicate an added value of the system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1301-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-10-08 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4766207/ /pubmed/26450108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1301-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article van der Stap, N. Rozeboom, E. D. Pullens, H. J. M. van der Heijden, F. Broeders, I. A. M. J. Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy |
title | Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy |
title_full | Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy |
title_short | Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy |
title_sort | feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4766207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26450108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1301-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderstapn feasibilityofautomatedtargetcentralizationincolonoscopy AT rozeboomed feasibilityofautomatedtargetcentralizationincolonoscopy AT pullenshjm feasibilityofautomatedtargetcentralizationincolonoscopy AT vanderheijdenf feasibilityofautomatedtargetcentralizationincolonoscopy AT broedersiamj feasibilityofautomatedtargetcentralizationincolonoscopy |