Cargando…
Open and Laparo-Endoscopic Repair of Incarcerated Abdominal Wall Hernias by the Use of Biological and Biosynthetic Meshes
INTRODUCTION: Although recently published guidelines recommend against the use of synthetic non-absorbable materials in cases of potentially contaminated or contaminated surgical fields due to the increased risk of infection (1, 2), the use of bio-prosthetic meshes for abdominal wall or ventral hern...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4766285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00010 |
_version_ | 1782417632633290752 |
---|---|
author | Fortelny, René H. Hofmann, Anna May, Christopher Köckerling, Ferdinand |
author_facet | Fortelny, René H. Hofmann, Anna May, Christopher Köckerling, Ferdinand |
author_sort | Fortelny, René H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Although recently published guidelines recommend against the use of synthetic non-absorbable materials in cases of potentially contaminated or contaminated surgical fields due to the increased risk of infection (1, 2), the use of bio-prosthetic meshes for abdominal wall or ventral hernia repair is still controversially discussed in such cases. Bio-prosthetic meshes have been recommended due to less susceptibility for infection and the decreased risk of subsequent mesh explantation. The purpose of this review is to elucidate if there are any indications for the use of biological and biosynthetic meshes in incarcerated abdominal wall hernias based on the recently published literature. METHODS: A literature search of the Medline database using the PubMed search engine, using the keywords returned 486 articles up to June 2015. The full text of 486 articles was assessed and 13 relevant papers were identified including 5 retrospective case cohort studies, 2 case-controlled studies, and 6 case series. RESULTS: The results of Franklin et al. (3–5) included the highest number of biological mesh repairs (Surgisis(®)) by laparoscopic IPOM in infected fields, which demonstrated a very low incidence of infection and recurrence (0.7 and 5.2%). Han et al. (6) reported in his retrospective study, the highest number of treated patients due to incarcerated hernias by open approach using acellular dermal matrix (ADM(®)) with very low rate of infection as well as recurrences (1.6 and 15.9%). Both studies achieved acceptable outcome in a follow-up of at least 3.5 years compared to the use of synthetic mesh in this high-risk population (7). CONCLUSION: Currently, there is a very limited evidence for the use of biological and biosynthetic meshes in strangulated hernias in either open or laparo-endoscopic repair. Finally, there is an urgent need to start with randomized controlled comparative trials as well as to support registries with data to achieve more knowledge for tailored indication for the use of biological meshes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4766285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47662852016-03-03 Open and Laparo-Endoscopic Repair of Incarcerated Abdominal Wall Hernias by the Use of Biological and Biosynthetic Meshes Fortelny, René H. Hofmann, Anna May, Christopher Köckerling, Ferdinand Front Surg Surgery INTRODUCTION: Although recently published guidelines recommend against the use of synthetic non-absorbable materials in cases of potentially contaminated or contaminated surgical fields due to the increased risk of infection (1, 2), the use of bio-prosthetic meshes for abdominal wall or ventral hernia repair is still controversially discussed in such cases. Bio-prosthetic meshes have been recommended due to less susceptibility for infection and the decreased risk of subsequent mesh explantation. The purpose of this review is to elucidate if there are any indications for the use of biological and biosynthetic meshes in incarcerated abdominal wall hernias based on the recently published literature. METHODS: A literature search of the Medline database using the PubMed search engine, using the keywords returned 486 articles up to June 2015. The full text of 486 articles was assessed and 13 relevant papers were identified including 5 retrospective case cohort studies, 2 case-controlled studies, and 6 case series. RESULTS: The results of Franklin et al. (3–5) included the highest number of biological mesh repairs (Surgisis(®)) by laparoscopic IPOM in infected fields, which demonstrated a very low incidence of infection and recurrence (0.7 and 5.2%). Han et al. (6) reported in his retrospective study, the highest number of treated patients due to incarcerated hernias by open approach using acellular dermal matrix (ADM(®)) with very low rate of infection as well as recurrences (1.6 and 15.9%). Both studies achieved acceptable outcome in a follow-up of at least 3.5 years compared to the use of synthetic mesh in this high-risk population (7). CONCLUSION: Currently, there is a very limited evidence for the use of biological and biosynthetic meshes in strangulated hernias in either open or laparo-endoscopic repair. Finally, there is an urgent need to start with randomized controlled comparative trials as well as to support registries with data to achieve more knowledge for tailored indication for the use of biological meshes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4766285/ /pubmed/26942182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00010 Text en Copyright © 2016 Fortelny, Hofmann, May, Köckerling and BioMesh Study Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Fortelny, René H. Hofmann, Anna May, Christopher Köckerling, Ferdinand Open and Laparo-Endoscopic Repair of Incarcerated Abdominal Wall Hernias by the Use of Biological and Biosynthetic Meshes |
title | Open and Laparo-Endoscopic Repair of Incarcerated Abdominal Wall Hernias by the Use of Biological and Biosynthetic Meshes |
title_full | Open and Laparo-Endoscopic Repair of Incarcerated Abdominal Wall Hernias by the Use of Biological and Biosynthetic Meshes |
title_fullStr | Open and Laparo-Endoscopic Repair of Incarcerated Abdominal Wall Hernias by the Use of Biological and Biosynthetic Meshes |
title_full_unstemmed | Open and Laparo-Endoscopic Repair of Incarcerated Abdominal Wall Hernias by the Use of Biological and Biosynthetic Meshes |
title_short | Open and Laparo-Endoscopic Repair of Incarcerated Abdominal Wall Hernias by the Use of Biological and Biosynthetic Meshes |
title_sort | open and laparo-endoscopic repair of incarcerated abdominal wall hernias by the use of biological and biosynthetic meshes |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4766285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fortelnyreneh openandlaparoendoscopicrepairofincarceratedabdominalwallherniasbytheuseofbiologicalandbiosyntheticmeshes AT hofmannanna openandlaparoendoscopicrepairofincarceratedabdominalwallherniasbytheuseofbiologicalandbiosyntheticmeshes AT maychristopher openandlaparoendoscopicrepairofincarceratedabdominalwallherniasbytheuseofbiologicalandbiosyntheticmeshes AT kockerlingferdinand openandlaparoendoscopicrepairofincarceratedabdominalwallherniasbytheuseofbiologicalandbiosyntheticmeshes AT openandlaparoendoscopicrepairofincarceratedabdominalwallherniasbytheuseofbiologicalandbiosyntheticmeshes |