Cargando…

Activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE: To analyse and compare the costs of hepatic tumor ablation with computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) and CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-RFA) as two alternative minimally invasive treatment options of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnapauff, D., Collettini, F., Steffen, I., Wieners, G., Hamm, B., Gebauer, B., Maurer, M. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4766654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26911437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0606-x
_version_ 1782417704700870656
author Schnapauff, D.
Collettini, F.
Steffen, I.
Wieners, G.
Hamm, B.
Gebauer, B.
Maurer, M. H.
author_facet Schnapauff, D.
Collettini, F.
Steffen, I.
Wieners, G.
Hamm, B.
Gebauer, B.
Maurer, M. H.
author_sort Schnapauff, D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyse and compare the costs of hepatic tumor ablation with computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) and CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-RFA) as two alternative minimally invasive treatment options of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An activity based process model was created determining working steps and required staff of CT-RFA and CT-HDRBT. Prorated costs of equipment use (purchase, depreciation, and maintenance), costs of staff, and expenditure for disposables were identified in a sample of 20 patients (10 treated by CT-RFA and 10 by CT-HDRBT) and compared. A sensitivity and break even analysis was performed to analyse the dependence of costs on the number of patients treated annually with both methods. RESULTS: Costs of CT-RFA were nearly stable with mean overall costs of approximately 1909 €, 1847 €, 1816 € and 1801 € per patient when treating 25, 50, 100 or 200 patients annually, as the main factor influencing the costs of this procedure was the single-use RFA probe. Mean costs of CT-HDRBT decreased significantly per patient ablation with a rising number of patients treated annually, with prorated costs of 3442 €, 1962 €, 1222 € and 852 € when treating 25, 50, 100 or 200 patients, due to low costs of single-use disposables compared to high annual fix-costs which proportionally decreased per patient with a higher number of patients treated annually. A break-even between both methods was reached when treating at least 55 patients annually. CONCLUSION: Although CT-HDRBT is a more complex procedure with more staff involved, it can be performed at lower costs per patient from the perspective of the medical provider when treating more than 55 patients compared to CT-RFA, mainly due to lower costs for disposables and a decreasing percentage of fixed costs with an increasing number of treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4766654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47666542016-02-26 Activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma Schnapauff, D. Collettini, F. Steffen, I. Wieners, G. Hamm, B. Gebauer, B. Maurer, M. H. Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To analyse and compare the costs of hepatic tumor ablation with computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) and CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-RFA) as two alternative minimally invasive treatment options of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An activity based process model was created determining working steps and required staff of CT-RFA and CT-HDRBT. Prorated costs of equipment use (purchase, depreciation, and maintenance), costs of staff, and expenditure for disposables were identified in a sample of 20 patients (10 treated by CT-RFA and 10 by CT-HDRBT) and compared. A sensitivity and break even analysis was performed to analyse the dependence of costs on the number of patients treated annually with both methods. RESULTS: Costs of CT-RFA were nearly stable with mean overall costs of approximately 1909 €, 1847 €, 1816 € and 1801 € per patient when treating 25, 50, 100 or 200 patients annually, as the main factor influencing the costs of this procedure was the single-use RFA probe. Mean costs of CT-HDRBT decreased significantly per patient ablation with a rising number of patients treated annually, with prorated costs of 3442 €, 1962 €, 1222 € and 852 € when treating 25, 50, 100 or 200 patients, due to low costs of single-use disposables compared to high annual fix-costs which proportionally decreased per patient with a higher number of patients treated annually. A break-even between both methods was reached when treating at least 55 patients annually. CONCLUSION: Although CT-HDRBT is a more complex procedure with more staff involved, it can be performed at lower costs per patient from the perspective of the medical provider when treating more than 55 patients compared to CT-RFA, mainly due to lower costs for disposables and a decreasing percentage of fixed costs with an increasing number of treatments. BioMed Central 2016-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4766654/ /pubmed/26911437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0606-x Text en © Schnapauff et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Schnapauff, D.
Collettini, F.
Steffen, I.
Wieners, G.
Hamm, B.
Gebauer, B.
Maurer, M. H.
Activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma
title Activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort activity-based cost analysis of hepatic tumor ablation using ct-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy or ct-guided radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4766654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26911437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0606-x
work_keys_str_mv AT schnapauffd activitybasedcostanalysisofhepatictumorablationusingctguidedhighdoseratebrachytherapyorctguidedradiofrequencyablationinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT collettinif activitybasedcostanalysisofhepatictumorablationusingctguidedhighdoseratebrachytherapyorctguidedradiofrequencyablationinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT steffeni activitybasedcostanalysisofhepatictumorablationusingctguidedhighdoseratebrachytherapyorctguidedradiofrequencyablationinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wienersg activitybasedcostanalysisofhepatictumorablationusingctguidedhighdoseratebrachytherapyorctguidedradiofrequencyablationinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hammb activitybasedcostanalysisofhepatictumorablationusingctguidedhighdoseratebrachytherapyorctguidedradiofrequencyablationinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT gebauerb activitybasedcostanalysisofhepatictumorablationusingctguidedhighdoseratebrachytherapyorctguidedradiofrequencyablationinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT maurermh activitybasedcostanalysisofhepatictumorablationusingctguidedhighdoseratebrachytherapyorctguidedradiofrequencyablationinhepatocellularcarcinoma