Cargando…

A CT method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients

BACKGROUND: Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is often used for evaluating implanted devices over time. Following patients who have had tantalum beads implanted as markers in conjunction with joint replacements is important for longitudinal evaluation of these patients and for those with similar impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olivecrona, Henrik, Maguire, Gerald Q, Noz, Marilyn E., Zeleznik, Michael P., Kesteris, Uldis, Weidenhielm, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4766687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26911571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0360-7
_version_ 1782417712005251072
author Olivecrona, Henrik
Maguire, Gerald Q
Noz, Marilyn E.
Zeleznik, Michael P.
Kesteris, Uldis
Weidenhielm, Lars
author_facet Olivecrona, Henrik
Maguire, Gerald Q
Noz, Marilyn E.
Zeleznik, Michael P.
Kesteris, Uldis
Weidenhielm, Lars
author_sort Olivecrona, Henrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is often used for evaluating implanted devices over time. Following patients who have had tantalum beads implanted as markers in conjunction with joint replacements is important for longitudinal evaluation of these patients and for those with similar implants. As doing traditional RSA imaging is exacting and limited to specialized centers, it is important to consider alternative techniques for this ongoing evaluation. This paper studies the use of computed tomography (CT) to evaluate over time tantalum beads which have been implanted as markers. METHODS: The project uses both a hip model implanted with tantalum beads, acquired in several orientations, at two different CT energy levels, and a cohort of seven patients. The model was evaluated twice by the same observer with a 1-week interval. All CT volumes were analyzed using a semi-automated 3D volume fusion (spatial registration) tool which provides landmark-based fusion of two volumes, registering a target volume with a reference volume using a rigid body 3D algorithm. The mean registration errors as well as the accuracy and repeatability of the method were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean registration error, maximum value of repeatability, and accuracy for the relative movement in the model were 0.16 mm, 0.02° and 0.1 mm, and 0.36° and 0.13 mm for 120 kVp and 0.21 mm, 0.04° and 0.01 mm, and 0.39° and 0.12 mm for 100 kVp. For the patients, the mean registration errors per patient ranged from 0.08 to 0.35 mm. These results are comparable to those in typical clinical RSA trials. This technique successfully evaluated two patients who would have been lost from the cohort if only RSA were used. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique can be used to evaluate patients with tantalum beads over time without the need for stereoradiographs. Further, the effective dose associated with CT is decreasing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4766687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47666872016-02-26 A CT method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients Olivecrona, Henrik Maguire, Gerald Q Noz, Marilyn E. Zeleznik, Michael P. Kesteris, Uldis Weidenhielm, Lars J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is often used for evaluating implanted devices over time. Following patients who have had tantalum beads implanted as markers in conjunction with joint replacements is important for longitudinal evaluation of these patients and for those with similar implants. As doing traditional RSA imaging is exacting and limited to specialized centers, it is important to consider alternative techniques for this ongoing evaluation. This paper studies the use of computed tomography (CT) to evaluate over time tantalum beads which have been implanted as markers. METHODS: The project uses both a hip model implanted with tantalum beads, acquired in several orientations, at two different CT energy levels, and a cohort of seven patients. The model was evaluated twice by the same observer with a 1-week interval. All CT volumes were analyzed using a semi-automated 3D volume fusion (spatial registration) tool which provides landmark-based fusion of two volumes, registering a target volume with a reference volume using a rigid body 3D algorithm. The mean registration errors as well as the accuracy and repeatability of the method were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean registration error, maximum value of repeatability, and accuracy for the relative movement in the model were 0.16 mm, 0.02° and 0.1 mm, and 0.36° and 0.13 mm for 120 kVp and 0.21 mm, 0.04° and 0.01 mm, and 0.39° and 0.12 mm for 100 kVp. For the patients, the mean registration errors per patient ranged from 0.08 to 0.35 mm. These results are comparable to those in typical clinical RSA trials. This technique successfully evaluated two patients who would have been lost from the cohort if only RSA were used. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique can be used to evaluate patients with tantalum beads over time without the need for stereoradiographs. Further, the effective dose associated with CT is decreasing. BioMed Central 2016-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4766687/ /pubmed/26911571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0360-7 Text en © Olivecrona et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olivecrona, Henrik
Maguire, Gerald Q
Noz, Marilyn E.
Zeleznik, Michael P.
Kesteris, Uldis
Weidenhielm, Lars
A CT method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients
title A CT method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients
title_full A CT method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients
title_fullStr A CT method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients
title_full_unstemmed A CT method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients
title_short A CT method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients
title_sort ct method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4766687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26911571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0360-7
work_keys_str_mv AT olivecronahenrik actmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT maguiregeraldq actmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT nozmarilyne actmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT zeleznikmichaelp actmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT kesterisuldis actmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT weidenhielmlars actmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT olivecronahenrik ctmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT maguiregeraldq ctmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT nozmarilyne ctmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT zeleznikmichaelp ctmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT kesterisuldis ctmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients
AT weidenhielmlars ctmethodforfollowingpatientswithbothprostheticreplacementandimplantedtantalumbeadspreliminaryanalysiswithapelvicmodelandinsevenpatients