Cargando…
Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study
OBJECTIVE: Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer has become a priority in recent years. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (L-NSRH) using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) in women...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000628 |
_version_ | 1782417781558345728 |
---|---|
author | Hao, Min Wang, Zhilian Wei, Fang Wang, Jingfang Wang, Wei Ping, Yi |
author_facet | Hao, Min Wang, Zhilian Wei, Fang Wang, Jingfang Wang, Wei Ping, Yi |
author_sort | Hao, Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer has become a priority in recent years. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (L-NSRH) using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) in women with cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with stage IB1 or IIA1 cervical cancer underwent L-NSRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to receive L-NSRH using a CUSA (CUSA group; n = 24) or using other techniques (non-CUSA group; n = 21). Recovery of bladder function (indwelling catheter time and time to spontaneous voiding) blood loss, duration of hospital stay, lymph node harvesting, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Patients were followed for up to 3 years to determine the maintenance of effect. RESULTS: All patients underwent L-NSRH successfully. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the CUSA than in the non-CUSA group (P = 0.005). Length of hospital stay (P = 0.006) and indwelling catheter time (P = 0.008) were both significantly reduced in the CUSA group compared with that in the non-CUSA group. The spontaneous voiding rate 10 days postoperatively was 95.8% with CUSA and 85.7% with non-CUSA techniques. Two patients developed postoperative complications in the CUSA group as did 3 patients in the non-CUSA group. These were cases of lymphocyst formation or urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy using CUSA was safe and feasible in patients with cervical cancer. Our results provide initial evidence that L-NSRH using CUSA preserves pelvic autonomic nerve function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4767107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47671072016-03-01 Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study Hao, Min Wang, Zhilian Wei, Fang Wang, Jingfang Wang, Wei Ping, Yi Int J Gynecol Cancer Surgeon’s Corner OBJECTIVE: Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer has become a priority in recent years. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (L-NSRH) using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) in women with cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with stage IB1 or IIA1 cervical cancer underwent L-NSRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to receive L-NSRH using a CUSA (CUSA group; n = 24) or using other techniques (non-CUSA group; n = 21). Recovery of bladder function (indwelling catheter time and time to spontaneous voiding) blood loss, duration of hospital stay, lymph node harvesting, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Patients were followed for up to 3 years to determine the maintenance of effect. RESULTS: All patients underwent L-NSRH successfully. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the CUSA than in the non-CUSA group (P = 0.005). Length of hospital stay (P = 0.006) and indwelling catheter time (P = 0.008) were both significantly reduced in the CUSA group compared with that in the non-CUSA group. The spontaneous voiding rate 10 days postoperatively was 95.8% with CUSA and 85.7% with non-CUSA techniques. Two patients developed postoperative complications in the CUSA group as did 3 patients in the non-CUSA group. These were cases of lymphocyst formation or urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy using CUSA was safe and feasible in patients with cervical cancer. Our results provide initial evidence that L-NSRH using CUSA preserves pelvic autonomic nerve function. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-03 2016-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4767107/ /pubmed/26807637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000628 Text en Copyright © 2016 by IGCS and ESGO This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBYNC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Surgeon’s Corner Hao, Min Wang, Zhilian Wei, Fang Wang, Jingfang Wang, Wei Ping, Yi Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study |
title | Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator in laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a pilot study |
topic | Surgeon’s Corner |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000628 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haomin cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy AT wangzhilian cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy AT weifang cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy AT wangjingfang cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy AT wangwei cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy AT pingyi cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy |