Cargando…

Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer has become a priority in recent years. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (L-NSRH) using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) in women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Min, Wang, Zhilian, Wei, Fang, Wang, Jingfang, Wang, Wei, Ping, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000628
_version_ 1782417781558345728
author Hao, Min
Wang, Zhilian
Wei, Fang
Wang, Jingfang
Wang, Wei
Ping, Yi
author_facet Hao, Min
Wang, Zhilian
Wei, Fang
Wang, Jingfang
Wang, Wei
Ping, Yi
author_sort Hao, Min
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer has become a priority in recent years. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (L-NSRH) using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) in women with cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with stage IB1 or IIA1 cervical cancer underwent L-NSRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to receive L-NSRH using a CUSA (CUSA group; n = 24) or using other techniques (non-CUSA group; n = 21). Recovery of bladder function (indwelling catheter time and time to spontaneous voiding) blood loss, duration of hospital stay, lymph node harvesting, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Patients were followed for up to 3 years to determine the maintenance of effect. RESULTS: All patients underwent L-NSRH successfully. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the CUSA than in the non-CUSA group (P = 0.005). Length of hospital stay (P = 0.006) and indwelling catheter time (P = 0.008) were both significantly reduced in the CUSA group compared with that in the non-CUSA group. The spontaneous voiding rate 10 days postoperatively was 95.8% with CUSA and 85.7% with non-CUSA techniques. Two patients developed postoperative complications in the CUSA group as did 3 patients in the non-CUSA group. These were cases of lymphocyst formation or urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy using CUSA was safe and feasible in patients with cervical cancer. Our results provide initial evidence that L-NSRH using CUSA preserves pelvic autonomic nerve function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4767107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47671072016-03-01 Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study Hao, Min Wang, Zhilian Wei, Fang Wang, Jingfang Wang, Wei Ping, Yi Int J Gynecol Cancer Surgeon’s Corner OBJECTIVE: Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer has become a priority in recent years. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (L-NSRH) using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) in women with cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with stage IB1 or IIA1 cervical cancer underwent L-NSRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to receive L-NSRH using a CUSA (CUSA group; n = 24) or using other techniques (non-CUSA group; n = 21). Recovery of bladder function (indwelling catheter time and time to spontaneous voiding) blood loss, duration of hospital stay, lymph node harvesting, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Patients were followed for up to 3 years to determine the maintenance of effect. RESULTS: All patients underwent L-NSRH successfully. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the CUSA than in the non-CUSA group (P = 0.005). Length of hospital stay (P = 0.006) and indwelling catheter time (P = 0.008) were both significantly reduced in the CUSA group compared with that in the non-CUSA group. The spontaneous voiding rate 10 days postoperatively was 95.8% with CUSA and 85.7% with non-CUSA techniques. Two patients developed postoperative complications in the CUSA group as did 3 patients in the non-CUSA group. These were cases of lymphocyst formation or urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy using CUSA was safe and feasible in patients with cervical cancer. Our results provide initial evidence that L-NSRH using CUSA preserves pelvic autonomic nerve function. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-03 2016-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4767107/ /pubmed/26807637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000628 Text en Copyright © 2016 by IGCS and ESGO This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBYNC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Surgeon’s Corner
Hao, Min
Wang, Zhilian
Wei, Fang
Wang, Jingfang
Wang, Wei
Ping, Yi
Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study
title Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study
title_full Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study
title_short Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study
title_sort cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator in laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a pilot study
topic Surgeon’s Corner
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000628
work_keys_str_mv AT haomin cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy
AT wangzhilian cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy
AT weifang cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy
AT wangjingfang cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy
AT wangwei cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy
AT pingyi cavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorinlaparoscopicnervesparingradicalhysterectomyapilotstudy