Cargando…

Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children

BACKGROUND: Antinuclear antibody (ANA) tests are frequently used to screen children for chronic inflammatory diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the diagnostic utility of this test is limited because of the large number of healthy children who have low-titer positive tests....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGhee, Julie L, Kickingbird, Lauren M, Jarvis, James N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC476739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15245579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-4-13
_version_ 1782121636081696768
author McGhee, Julie L
Kickingbird, Lauren M
Jarvis, James N
author_facet McGhee, Julie L
Kickingbird, Lauren M
Jarvis, James N
author_sort McGhee, Julie L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antinuclear antibody (ANA) tests are frequently used to screen children for chronic inflammatory diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the diagnostic utility of this test is limited because of the large number of healthy children who have low-titer positive tests. We sought to determine the clinical utility of ANA tests in screening children for rheumatic disease and to determine whether there are specific signs or symptoms that enhance the clinical utility of ANA tests in children. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of 509 new patient referrals. Charts of patients referred because of results of ANA testing were selected for further analysis. Children with JRA, SLE, and other conditions were compared using demographic data, chief complaints at the time of presentation, and ANA titers. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were referred because of an ANA test interpreted as positive. Ten patients were subsequently diagnosed with SLE. In addition, we identified one patient with mixed connective tissue disease, and an additional child with idiopathic Raynaud's phenomenon. Eighteen children of the children referred for a positive ANA test had juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Another 80 children with positive ANA tests were identified, the majority of whom (n = 39, 49%) had musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Neither the presence nor the titer of ANA served to distinguish children with JRA from children with other musculoskeletal conditions. Children with JRA were readily identified on the basis of the history and physical examination. Children with SLE were therefore compared with children with positive ANA tests who did not have JRA, designated the "comparison group." Non-urticarial rash was more common in children with SLE than in children without chronic inflammatory disease (p = 0.007). Children with SLE were also older (mean ± sd = 14.2 ± 2.5 years) than the comparison group (11.0 ± 3.6 years; p = 0.001). ANA titer was also a significant discriminator between children with SLE and children without chronic inflammatory disease. The median ANA titer in children with SLE was 1: 1,080 compared with 1:160 for other children (p < 0.0001). ANA titers of ≥1,080 had a positive predictive value for SLE of 1.0 while titers of ≤1: 360 had a negative predictive value for lupus of 0.84. CONCLUSION: Age and ANA titer assist in discriminating children with SLE from children with other conditions. ANA tests are of no diagnostic utility in either making or excluding the diagnosis of JRA.
format Text
id pubmed-476739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-4767392004-07-18 Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children McGhee, Julie L Kickingbird, Lauren M Jarvis, James N BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Antinuclear antibody (ANA) tests are frequently used to screen children for chronic inflammatory diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the diagnostic utility of this test is limited because of the large number of healthy children who have low-titer positive tests. We sought to determine the clinical utility of ANA tests in screening children for rheumatic disease and to determine whether there are specific signs or symptoms that enhance the clinical utility of ANA tests in children. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of 509 new patient referrals. Charts of patients referred because of results of ANA testing were selected for further analysis. Children with JRA, SLE, and other conditions were compared using demographic data, chief complaints at the time of presentation, and ANA titers. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were referred because of an ANA test interpreted as positive. Ten patients were subsequently diagnosed with SLE. In addition, we identified one patient with mixed connective tissue disease, and an additional child with idiopathic Raynaud's phenomenon. Eighteen children of the children referred for a positive ANA test had juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Another 80 children with positive ANA tests were identified, the majority of whom (n = 39, 49%) had musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Neither the presence nor the titer of ANA served to distinguish children with JRA from children with other musculoskeletal conditions. Children with JRA were readily identified on the basis of the history and physical examination. Children with SLE were therefore compared with children with positive ANA tests who did not have JRA, designated the "comparison group." Non-urticarial rash was more common in children with SLE than in children without chronic inflammatory disease (p = 0.007). Children with SLE were also older (mean ± sd = 14.2 ± 2.5 years) than the comparison group (11.0 ± 3.6 years; p = 0.001). ANA titer was also a significant discriminator between children with SLE and children without chronic inflammatory disease. The median ANA titer in children with SLE was 1: 1,080 compared with 1:160 for other children (p < 0.0001). ANA titers of ≥1,080 had a positive predictive value for SLE of 1.0 while titers of ≤1: 360 had a negative predictive value for lupus of 0.84. CONCLUSION: Age and ANA titer assist in discriminating children with SLE from children with other conditions. ANA tests are of no diagnostic utility in either making or excluding the diagnosis of JRA. BioMed Central 2004-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC476739/ /pubmed/15245579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-4-13 Text en Copyright © 2004 McGhee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
McGhee, Julie L
Kickingbird, Lauren M
Jarvis, James N
Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children
title Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children
title_full Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children
title_fullStr Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children
title_short Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children
title_sort clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC476739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15245579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-4-13
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgheejuliel clinicalutilityofantinuclearantibodytestsinchildren
AT kickingbirdlaurenm clinicalutilityofantinuclearantibodytestsinchildren
AT jarvisjamesn clinicalutilityofantinuclearantibodytestsinchildren