Cargando…

The Advantages of Structural Equation Modeling to Address the Complexity of Spatial Reference Learning

Background: Cognitive performance is a complex process influenced by multiple factors. Cognitive assessment in experimental animals is often based on longitudinal datasets analyzed using uni- and multi-variate analyses, that do not account for the temporal dimension of cognitive performance and also...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreira, Pedro S., Sotiropoulos, Ioannis, Silva, Joana, Takashima, Akihiko, Sousa, Nuno, Leite-Almeida, Hugo, Costa, Patrício S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26955327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00018
_version_ 1782417874559696896
author Moreira, Pedro S.
Sotiropoulos, Ioannis
Silva, Joana
Takashima, Akihiko
Sousa, Nuno
Leite-Almeida, Hugo
Costa, Patrício S.
author_facet Moreira, Pedro S.
Sotiropoulos, Ioannis
Silva, Joana
Takashima, Akihiko
Sousa, Nuno
Leite-Almeida, Hugo
Costa, Patrício S.
author_sort Moreira, Pedro S.
collection PubMed
description Background: Cognitive performance is a complex process influenced by multiple factors. Cognitive assessment in experimental animals is often based on longitudinal datasets analyzed using uni- and multi-variate analyses, that do not account for the temporal dimension of cognitive performance and also do not adequately quantify the relative contribution of individual factors onto the overall behavioral outcome. To circumvent these limitations, we applied an Autoregressive Latent Trajectory (ALT) to analyze the Morris water maze (MWM) test in a complex experimental design involving four factors: stress, age, sex, and genotype. Outcomes were compared with a traditional Mixed-Design Factorial ANOVA (MDF ANOVA). Results: In both the MDF ANOVA and ALT models, sex, and stress had a significant effect on learning throughout the 9 days. However, on the ALT approach, the effects of sex were restricted to the learning growth. Unlike the MDF ANOVA, the ALT model revealed the influence of single factors at each specific learning stage and quantified the cross interactions among them. In addition, ALT allows us to consider the influence of baseline performance, a critical and unsolved problem that frequently yields inaccurate interpretations in the classical ANOVA model. Discussion: Our findings suggest the beneficial use of ALT models in the analysis of complex longitudinal datasets offering a better biological interpretation of the interrelationship of the factors that may influence cognitive performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4767929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47679292016-03-07 The Advantages of Structural Equation Modeling to Address the Complexity of Spatial Reference Learning Moreira, Pedro S. Sotiropoulos, Ioannis Silva, Joana Takashima, Akihiko Sousa, Nuno Leite-Almeida, Hugo Costa, Patrício S. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Cognitive performance is a complex process influenced by multiple factors. Cognitive assessment in experimental animals is often based on longitudinal datasets analyzed using uni- and multi-variate analyses, that do not account for the temporal dimension of cognitive performance and also do not adequately quantify the relative contribution of individual factors onto the overall behavioral outcome. To circumvent these limitations, we applied an Autoregressive Latent Trajectory (ALT) to analyze the Morris water maze (MWM) test in a complex experimental design involving four factors: stress, age, sex, and genotype. Outcomes were compared with a traditional Mixed-Design Factorial ANOVA (MDF ANOVA). Results: In both the MDF ANOVA and ALT models, sex, and stress had a significant effect on learning throughout the 9 days. However, on the ALT approach, the effects of sex were restricted to the learning growth. Unlike the MDF ANOVA, the ALT model revealed the influence of single factors at each specific learning stage and quantified the cross interactions among them. In addition, ALT allows us to consider the influence of baseline performance, a critical and unsolved problem that frequently yields inaccurate interpretations in the classical ANOVA model. Discussion: Our findings suggest the beneficial use of ALT models in the analysis of complex longitudinal datasets offering a better biological interpretation of the interrelationship of the factors that may influence cognitive performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4767929/ /pubmed/26955327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00018 Text en Copyright © 2016 Moreira, Sotiropoulos, Silva, Takashima, Sousa, Leite-Almeida and Costa. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Moreira, Pedro S.
Sotiropoulos, Ioannis
Silva, Joana
Takashima, Akihiko
Sousa, Nuno
Leite-Almeida, Hugo
Costa, Patrício S.
The Advantages of Structural Equation Modeling to Address the Complexity of Spatial Reference Learning
title The Advantages of Structural Equation Modeling to Address the Complexity of Spatial Reference Learning
title_full The Advantages of Structural Equation Modeling to Address the Complexity of Spatial Reference Learning
title_fullStr The Advantages of Structural Equation Modeling to Address the Complexity of Spatial Reference Learning
title_full_unstemmed The Advantages of Structural Equation Modeling to Address the Complexity of Spatial Reference Learning
title_short The Advantages of Structural Equation Modeling to Address the Complexity of Spatial Reference Learning
title_sort advantages of structural equation modeling to address the complexity of spatial reference learning
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26955327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00018
work_keys_str_mv AT moreirapedros theadvantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT sotiropoulosioannis theadvantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT silvajoana theadvantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT takashimaakihiko theadvantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT sousanuno theadvantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT leitealmeidahugo theadvantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT costapatricios theadvantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT moreirapedros advantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT sotiropoulosioannis advantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT silvajoana advantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT takashimaakihiko advantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT sousanuno advantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT leitealmeidahugo advantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning
AT costapatricios advantagesofstructuralequationmodelingtoaddressthecomplexityofspatialreferencelearning