Cargando…

What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names

In order to refer using a name, speakers must believe that their addressee knows about the link between the name and the intended referent. In cases where speakers and addressees learned a subset of names together, speakers are adept at using only the names their partner knows. But speakers do not a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gegg-Harrison, Whitney M., Tanenhaus, Michael K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26955361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00212
_version_ 1782417875247562752
author Gegg-Harrison, Whitney M.
Tanenhaus, Michael K.
author_facet Gegg-Harrison, Whitney M.
Tanenhaus, Michael K.
author_sort Gegg-Harrison, Whitney M.
collection PubMed
description In order to refer using a name, speakers must believe that their addressee knows about the link between the name and the intended referent. In cases where speakers and addressees learned a subset of names together, speakers are adept at using only the names their partner knows. But speakers do not always share such learning experience with their conversational partners. In these situations, what information guides speakers' choice of referring expression? A speaker who is uncertain about a names' common ground (CG) status often uses a name and description together. This N+D form allows speakers to demonstrate knowledge of a name, and could provide, even in the absence of miscommunication, useful evidence to the addressee regarding the speaker's knowledge. In cases where knowledge of one name is associated with knowledge of other names, this could provide indirect evidence regarding knowledge of other names that could support generalizations used to update beliefs about CG. Using Bayesian approaches to language processing as a guiding framework, we predict that interlocutors can use their partner's choice of referring expression, in particular their use of an N+D form, to generate more accurate beliefs regarding their partner's knowledge of other names. In Experiment 1, we find that domain experts are able to use their partner's referring expression choices to generate more accurate estimates of CG. In Experiment 2, we find that interlocutors are able to infer from a partner's use of an N+D form which other names that partner is likely to know or not know. Our results suggest that interlocutors can use the information conveyed in their partner's choice of referring expression to make generalizations that contribute to more accurate beliefs about what is shared with their partner, and further, that models of CG for reference need to account not just for the status of referents, but the status of means of referring to those referents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4767932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47679322016-03-07 What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names Gegg-Harrison, Whitney M. Tanenhaus, Michael K. Front Psychol Psychology In order to refer using a name, speakers must believe that their addressee knows about the link between the name and the intended referent. In cases where speakers and addressees learned a subset of names together, speakers are adept at using only the names their partner knows. But speakers do not always share such learning experience with their conversational partners. In these situations, what information guides speakers' choice of referring expression? A speaker who is uncertain about a names' common ground (CG) status often uses a name and description together. This N+D form allows speakers to demonstrate knowledge of a name, and could provide, even in the absence of miscommunication, useful evidence to the addressee regarding the speaker's knowledge. In cases where knowledge of one name is associated with knowledge of other names, this could provide indirect evidence regarding knowledge of other names that could support generalizations used to update beliefs about CG. Using Bayesian approaches to language processing as a guiding framework, we predict that interlocutors can use their partner's choice of referring expression, in particular their use of an N+D form, to generate more accurate beliefs regarding their partner's knowledge of other names. In Experiment 1, we find that domain experts are able to use their partner's referring expression choices to generate more accurate estimates of CG. In Experiment 2, we find that interlocutors are able to infer from a partner's use of an N+D form which other names that partner is likely to know or not know. Our results suggest that interlocutors can use the information conveyed in their partner's choice of referring expression to make generalizations that contribute to more accurate beliefs about what is shared with their partner, and further, that models of CG for reference need to account not just for the status of referents, but the status of means of referring to those referents. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4767932/ /pubmed/26955361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00212 Text en Copyright © 2016 Gegg-Harrison and Tanenhaus. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Gegg-Harrison, Whitney M.
Tanenhaus, Michael K.
What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names
title What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names
title_full What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names
title_fullStr What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names
title_full_unstemmed What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names
title_short What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names
title_sort what's in a name? interlocutors dynamically update expectations about shared names
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26955361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00212
work_keys_str_mv AT geggharrisonwhitneym whatsinanameinterlocutorsdynamicallyupdateexpectationsaboutsharednames
AT tanenhausmichaelk whatsinanameinterlocutorsdynamicallyupdateexpectationsaboutsharednames