Cargando…

A systematic evaluation of the scale invariance of texture recognition methods

A large variety of well-known scale-invariant texture recognition methods is tested with respect to their scale invariance. The scale invariance of these methods is estimated by comparing the results of two test setups. In the first test setup, the images of the training and evaluation set are acqui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uhl, Andreas, Wimmer, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27034616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10044-014-0435-1
_version_ 1782417927443578880
author Uhl, Andreas
Wimmer, Georg
author_facet Uhl, Andreas
Wimmer, Georg
author_sort Uhl, Andreas
collection PubMed
description A large variety of well-known scale-invariant texture recognition methods is tested with respect to their scale invariance. The scale invariance of these methods is estimated by comparing the results of two test setups. In the first test setup, the images of the training and evaluation set are acquired under same scale conditions and in the second test setup, the images in the evaluation set are gathered under different scale conditions than those of the training set. For the first test setup, scale invariance is not needed, whereas for the second test setup, scale invariance is obviously crucial. The difference between the results of these two test setups indicates the scale invariance of a method (the higher the scale invariance the lower the difference). The scale invariance of the methods is additionally estimated by analyzing the similarity of the feature vectors of images and their scaled versions. Additionally to the scale invariance, we also test eventual viewpoint and illumination invariance of the methods. As texture databases for our tests we use the KTH-TIPS database and the CUReT database. Results imply that many of the considered methods are not as scale-invariant as expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4768293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47682932016-03-29 A systematic evaluation of the scale invariance of texture recognition methods Uhl, Andreas Wimmer, Georg Pattern Anal Appl Short Paper A large variety of well-known scale-invariant texture recognition methods is tested with respect to their scale invariance. The scale invariance of these methods is estimated by comparing the results of two test setups. In the first test setup, the images of the training and evaluation set are acquired under same scale conditions and in the second test setup, the images in the evaluation set are gathered under different scale conditions than those of the training set. For the first test setup, scale invariance is not needed, whereas for the second test setup, scale invariance is obviously crucial. The difference between the results of these two test setups indicates the scale invariance of a method (the higher the scale invariance the lower the difference). The scale invariance of the methods is additionally estimated by analyzing the similarity of the feature vectors of images and their scaled versions. Additionally to the scale invariance, we also test eventual viewpoint and illumination invariance of the methods. As texture databases for our tests we use the KTH-TIPS database and the CUReT database. Results imply that many of the considered methods are not as scale-invariant as expected. Springer London 2014-12-09 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4768293/ /pubmed/27034616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10044-014-0435-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Short Paper
Uhl, Andreas
Wimmer, Georg
A systematic evaluation of the scale invariance of texture recognition methods
title A systematic evaluation of the scale invariance of texture recognition methods
title_full A systematic evaluation of the scale invariance of texture recognition methods
title_fullStr A systematic evaluation of the scale invariance of texture recognition methods
title_full_unstemmed A systematic evaluation of the scale invariance of texture recognition methods
title_short A systematic evaluation of the scale invariance of texture recognition methods
title_sort systematic evaluation of the scale invariance of texture recognition methods
topic Short Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27034616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10044-014-0435-1
work_keys_str_mv AT uhlandreas asystematicevaluationofthescaleinvarianceoftexturerecognitionmethods
AT wimmergeorg asystematicevaluationofthescaleinvarianceoftexturerecognitionmethods
AT uhlandreas systematicevaluationofthescaleinvarianceoftexturerecognitionmethods
AT wimmergeorg systematicevaluationofthescaleinvarianceoftexturerecognitionmethods