Cargando…
Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing requirement to assess outcomes, but few measures have been tested for advanced medical illness. We aimed to test the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS), and to analyse predictors of change after the transition to pal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26920738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6 |
_version_ | 1782417931976572928 |
---|---|
author | Costantini, Massimo Rabitti, Elisa Beccaro, Monica Fusco, Flavio Peruselli, Carlo La Ciura, Pietro Valle, Alessandro Suriani, Cinzia Berardi, Maria Alejandra Valenti, Danila Mosso, Felicita Morino, Piero Zaninetta, Giovanni Tubere, Giorgio Piazza, Massimo Sofia, Michele Di Leo, Silvia Higginson, Irene J. |
author_facet | Costantini, Massimo Rabitti, Elisa Beccaro, Monica Fusco, Flavio Peruselli, Carlo La Ciura, Pietro Valle, Alessandro Suriani, Cinzia Berardi, Maria Alejandra Valenti, Danila Mosso, Felicita Morino, Piero Zaninetta, Giovanni Tubere, Giorgio Piazza, Massimo Sofia, Michele Di Leo, Silvia Higginson, Irene J. |
author_sort | Costantini, Massimo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is an increasing requirement to assess outcomes, but few measures have been tested for advanced medical illness. We aimed to test the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS), and to analyse predictors of change after the transition to palliative care. METHODS: Phase 1: multicentre, mixed method study comprising cognitive and qualitative interviews with patients and staff, cultural refinement and adaption. Phase 2: consecutive cancer patients on admission to 8 inpatient hospices and 7 home-based teams were asked to complete the POS, the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp (T0), to assess internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity. After 6 days (T1) patients and staff completed the POS to assess responsiveness to change (T1-T0), and agreement between self-assessed POS and POS completed by the staff. Finally, we asked hospices an assessment 24–48 h after T1 to assess its reliability (test re-test analysis). RESULTS: Phase I: 209 completed POS questionnaires and 29 cognitive interviews were assessed, revisions made and one item substituted. Phase II: 295 consecutive patients admitted to 15 PCTs were approached, 175 (59.3 %) were eligible, and 150 (85.7 %) consented. Consent was limited by the severity of illness in 40 % patients. We found good convergent validity, with strong and moderate correlations (r ranged 0.5–0.8) between similar items from the POS, the QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp. As hypothesised, the physical function subscale of QLQ-C15-PAL was not correlated with any POS item (r ranged -0.16–0.02). We found acceptable to good test re-test reliability in both versions for 6 items. We found significant clinical improvements during the first week of palliative care in 7/10 items assessed-pain, other symptoms, patient and family anxiety, information, feeling at peace and wasted time. CONCLUSIONS: Both the patient self-assessed and professional POS versions are valid and with an acceptable internal consistency. POS detected significant clinical improvements during palliative care, at a time when patients are usually expected to deteriorate. These results suggest that there is room for substantial improvement in the management of patients with advanced disease, across all key domains-symptoms, psychological, information, social and spiritual. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4768331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47683312016-02-27 Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients Costantini, Massimo Rabitti, Elisa Beccaro, Monica Fusco, Flavio Peruselli, Carlo La Ciura, Pietro Valle, Alessandro Suriani, Cinzia Berardi, Maria Alejandra Valenti, Danila Mosso, Felicita Morino, Piero Zaninetta, Giovanni Tubere, Giorgio Piazza, Massimo Sofia, Michele Di Leo, Silvia Higginson, Irene J. BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: There is an increasing requirement to assess outcomes, but few measures have been tested for advanced medical illness. We aimed to test the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS), and to analyse predictors of change after the transition to palliative care. METHODS: Phase 1: multicentre, mixed method study comprising cognitive and qualitative interviews with patients and staff, cultural refinement and adaption. Phase 2: consecutive cancer patients on admission to 8 inpatient hospices and 7 home-based teams were asked to complete the POS, the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp (T0), to assess internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity. After 6 days (T1) patients and staff completed the POS to assess responsiveness to change (T1-T0), and agreement between self-assessed POS and POS completed by the staff. Finally, we asked hospices an assessment 24–48 h after T1 to assess its reliability (test re-test analysis). RESULTS: Phase I: 209 completed POS questionnaires and 29 cognitive interviews were assessed, revisions made and one item substituted. Phase II: 295 consecutive patients admitted to 15 PCTs were approached, 175 (59.3 %) were eligible, and 150 (85.7 %) consented. Consent was limited by the severity of illness in 40 % patients. We found good convergent validity, with strong and moderate correlations (r ranged 0.5–0.8) between similar items from the POS, the QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp. As hypothesised, the physical function subscale of QLQ-C15-PAL was not correlated with any POS item (r ranged -0.16–0.02). We found acceptable to good test re-test reliability in both versions for 6 items. We found significant clinical improvements during the first week of palliative care in 7/10 items assessed-pain, other symptoms, patient and family anxiety, information, feeling at peace and wasted time. CONCLUSIONS: Both the patient self-assessed and professional POS versions are valid and with an acceptable internal consistency. POS detected significant clinical improvements during palliative care, at a time when patients are usually expected to deteriorate. These results suggest that there is room for substantial improvement in the management of patients with advanced disease, across all key domains-symptoms, psychological, information, social and spiritual. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4768331/ /pubmed/26920738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6 Text en © Costantini et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Costantini, Massimo Rabitti, Elisa Beccaro, Monica Fusco, Flavio Peruselli, Carlo La Ciura, Pietro Valle, Alessandro Suriani, Cinzia Berardi, Maria Alejandra Valenti, Danila Mosso, Felicita Morino, Piero Zaninetta, Giovanni Tubere, Giorgio Piazza, Massimo Sofia, Michele Di Leo, Silvia Higginson, Irene J. Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients |
title | Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients |
title_full | Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients |
title_short | Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients |
title_sort | validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26920738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costantinimassimo validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT rabittielisa validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT beccaromonica validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT fuscoflavio validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT perusellicarlo validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT laciurapietro validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT vallealessandro validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT surianicinzia validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT berardimariaalejandra validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT valentidanila validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT mossofelicita validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT morinopiero validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT zaninettagiovanni validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT tuberegiorgio validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT piazzamassimo validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT sofiamichele validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT dileosilvia validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients AT higginsonirenej validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients |