Cargando…

Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing requirement to assess outcomes, but few measures have been tested for advanced medical illness. We aimed to test the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS), and to analyse predictors of change after the transition to pal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costantini, Massimo, Rabitti, Elisa, Beccaro, Monica, Fusco, Flavio, Peruselli, Carlo, La Ciura, Pietro, Valle, Alessandro, Suriani, Cinzia, Berardi, Maria Alejandra, Valenti, Danila, Mosso, Felicita, Morino, Piero, Zaninetta, Giovanni, Tubere, Giorgio, Piazza, Massimo, Sofia, Michele, Di Leo, Silvia, Higginson, Irene J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26920738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6
_version_ 1782417931976572928
author Costantini, Massimo
Rabitti, Elisa
Beccaro, Monica
Fusco, Flavio
Peruselli, Carlo
La Ciura, Pietro
Valle, Alessandro
Suriani, Cinzia
Berardi, Maria Alejandra
Valenti, Danila
Mosso, Felicita
Morino, Piero
Zaninetta, Giovanni
Tubere, Giorgio
Piazza, Massimo
Sofia, Michele
Di Leo, Silvia
Higginson, Irene J.
author_facet Costantini, Massimo
Rabitti, Elisa
Beccaro, Monica
Fusco, Flavio
Peruselli, Carlo
La Ciura, Pietro
Valle, Alessandro
Suriani, Cinzia
Berardi, Maria Alejandra
Valenti, Danila
Mosso, Felicita
Morino, Piero
Zaninetta, Giovanni
Tubere, Giorgio
Piazza, Massimo
Sofia, Michele
Di Leo, Silvia
Higginson, Irene J.
author_sort Costantini, Massimo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an increasing requirement to assess outcomes, but few measures have been tested for advanced medical illness. We aimed to test the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS), and to analyse predictors of change after the transition to palliative care. METHODS: Phase 1: multicentre, mixed method study comprising cognitive and qualitative interviews with patients and staff, cultural refinement and adaption. Phase 2: consecutive cancer patients on admission to 8 inpatient hospices and 7 home-based teams were asked to complete the POS, the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp (T0), to assess internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity. After 6 days (T1) patients and staff completed the POS to assess responsiveness to change (T1-T0), and agreement between self-assessed POS and POS completed by the staff. Finally, we asked hospices an assessment 24–48 h after T1 to assess its reliability (test re-test analysis). RESULTS: Phase I: 209 completed POS questionnaires and 29 cognitive interviews were assessed, revisions made and one item substituted. Phase II: 295 consecutive patients admitted to 15 PCTs were approached, 175 (59.3 %) were eligible, and 150 (85.7 %) consented. Consent was limited by the severity of illness in 40 % patients. We found good convergent validity, with strong and moderate correlations (r ranged 0.5–0.8) between similar items from the POS, the QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp. As hypothesised, the physical function subscale of QLQ-C15-PAL was not correlated with any POS item (r ranged -0.16–0.02). We found acceptable to good test re-test reliability in both versions for 6 items. We found significant clinical improvements during the first week of palliative care in 7/10 items assessed-pain, other symptoms, patient and family anxiety, information, feeling at peace and wasted time. CONCLUSIONS: Both the patient self-assessed and professional POS versions are valid and with an acceptable internal consistency. POS detected significant clinical improvements during palliative care, at a time when patients are usually expected to deteriorate. These results suggest that there is room for substantial improvement in the management of patients with advanced disease, across all key domains-symptoms, psychological, information, social and spiritual. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4768331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47683312016-02-27 Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients Costantini, Massimo Rabitti, Elisa Beccaro, Monica Fusco, Flavio Peruselli, Carlo La Ciura, Pietro Valle, Alessandro Suriani, Cinzia Berardi, Maria Alejandra Valenti, Danila Mosso, Felicita Morino, Piero Zaninetta, Giovanni Tubere, Giorgio Piazza, Massimo Sofia, Michele Di Leo, Silvia Higginson, Irene J. BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: There is an increasing requirement to assess outcomes, but few measures have been tested for advanced medical illness. We aimed to test the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS), and to analyse predictors of change after the transition to palliative care. METHODS: Phase 1: multicentre, mixed method study comprising cognitive and qualitative interviews with patients and staff, cultural refinement and adaption. Phase 2: consecutive cancer patients on admission to 8 inpatient hospices and 7 home-based teams were asked to complete the POS, the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp (T0), to assess internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity. After 6 days (T1) patients and staff completed the POS to assess responsiveness to change (T1-T0), and agreement between self-assessed POS and POS completed by the staff. Finally, we asked hospices an assessment 24–48 h after T1 to assess its reliability (test re-test analysis). RESULTS: Phase I: 209 completed POS questionnaires and 29 cognitive interviews were assessed, revisions made and one item substituted. Phase II: 295 consecutive patients admitted to 15 PCTs were approached, 175 (59.3 %) were eligible, and 150 (85.7 %) consented. Consent was limited by the severity of illness in 40 % patients. We found good convergent validity, with strong and moderate correlations (r ranged 0.5–0.8) between similar items from the POS, the QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp. As hypothesised, the physical function subscale of QLQ-C15-PAL was not correlated with any POS item (r ranged -0.16–0.02). We found acceptable to good test re-test reliability in both versions for 6 items. We found significant clinical improvements during the first week of palliative care in 7/10 items assessed-pain, other symptoms, patient and family anxiety, information, feeling at peace and wasted time. CONCLUSIONS: Both the patient self-assessed and professional POS versions are valid and with an acceptable internal consistency. POS detected significant clinical improvements during palliative care, at a time when patients are usually expected to deteriorate. These results suggest that there is room for substantial improvement in the management of patients with advanced disease, across all key domains-symptoms, psychological, information, social and spiritual. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4768331/ /pubmed/26920738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6 Text en © Costantini et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Costantini, Massimo
Rabitti, Elisa
Beccaro, Monica
Fusco, Flavio
Peruselli, Carlo
La Ciura, Pietro
Valle, Alessandro
Suriani, Cinzia
Berardi, Maria Alejandra
Valenti, Danila
Mosso, Felicita
Morino, Piero
Zaninetta, Giovanni
Tubere, Giorgio
Piazza, Massimo
Sofia, Michele
Di Leo, Silvia
Higginson, Irene J.
Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients
title Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients
title_full Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients
title_fullStr Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients
title_short Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients
title_sort validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26920738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0095-6
work_keys_str_mv AT costantinimassimo validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT rabittielisa validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT beccaromonica validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT fuscoflavio validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT perusellicarlo validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT laciurapietro validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT vallealessandro validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT surianicinzia validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT berardimariaalejandra validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT valentidanila validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT mossofelicita validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT morinopiero validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT zaninettagiovanni validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT tuberegiorgio validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT piazzamassimo validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT sofiamichele validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT dileosilvia validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients
AT higginsonirenej validityreliabilityandresponsivenesstochangeoftheitalianpalliativecareoutcomescaleamulticenterstudyofadvancedcancerpatients