Cargando…

Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction

A clear consensus does not exist about whether the initial dose of gemcitabine, an essential anticancer antimetabolite, should be reduced in patients with liver dysfunction. Adult patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer were divided into three groups according to whether they had mild, mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shibata, Takashi, Ebata, Tomoki, Fujita, Ken‐ichi, Shimokata, Tomoya, Maeda, Osamu, Mitsuma, Ayako, Sasaki, Yasutsuna, Nagino, Masato, Ando, Yuichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26595259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12851
_version_ 1782417940827602944
author Shibata, Takashi
Ebata, Tomoki
Fujita, Ken‐ichi
Shimokata, Tomoya
Maeda, Osamu
Mitsuma, Ayako
Sasaki, Yasutsuna
Nagino, Masato
Ando, Yuichi
author_facet Shibata, Takashi
Ebata, Tomoki
Fujita, Ken‐ichi
Shimokata, Tomoya
Maeda, Osamu
Mitsuma, Ayako
Sasaki, Yasutsuna
Nagino, Masato
Ando, Yuichi
author_sort Shibata, Takashi
collection PubMed
description A clear consensus does not exist about whether the initial dose of gemcitabine, an essential anticancer antimetabolite, should be reduced in patients with liver dysfunction. Adult patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer were divided into three groups according to whether they had mild, moderate, or severe liver dysfunction, evaluated on the basis of serum bilirubin and liver transaminase levels at baseline. As anticancer treatment, gemcitabine at a dose of 800 or 1000 mg/m(2) was given as an i.v. infusion once weekly for 3 weeks of a 4‐week cycle. The patients were prospectively evaluated for adverse events during the first cycle, and the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its inactive metabolite, difluorodeoxyuridine, were studied to determine the optimal initial dose of gemcitabine as monotherapy according to the severity of liver dysfunction. A total of 15 patients were studied. Liver dysfunction was mild in one patient, moderate in six, and severe in eight. All 15 patients had been undergoing biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice when they received gemcitabine. Grade 3 cholangitis developed in one patient with moderate liver dysfunction who received gemcitabine at the dose level of 1000 mg/m(2). No other patients had severe treatment‐related adverse events resulting in the omission or discontinuation of gemcitabine treatment. The plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and difluorodeoxyuridine were similar among the groups. An initial dose reduction of gemcitabine as monotherapy for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancers is not necessary for patients with hyperbilirubinemia, provided that obstructive jaundice is well managed. (Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000005363.)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4768397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47683972016-04-01 Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction Shibata, Takashi Ebata, Tomoki Fujita, Ken‐ichi Shimokata, Tomoya Maeda, Osamu Mitsuma, Ayako Sasaki, Yasutsuna Nagino, Masato Ando, Yuichi Cancer Sci Original Articles A clear consensus does not exist about whether the initial dose of gemcitabine, an essential anticancer antimetabolite, should be reduced in patients with liver dysfunction. Adult patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer were divided into three groups according to whether they had mild, moderate, or severe liver dysfunction, evaluated on the basis of serum bilirubin and liver transaminase levels at baseline. As anticancer treatment, gemcitabine at a dose of 800 or 1000 mg/m(2) was given as an i.v. infusion once weekly for 3 weeks of a 4‐week cycle. The patients were prospectively evaluated for adverse events during the first cycle, and the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its inactive metabolite, difluorodeoxyuridine, were studied to determine the optimal initial dose of gemcitabine as monotherapy according to the severity of liver dysfunction. A total of 15 patients were studied. Liver dysfunction was mild in one patient, moderate in six, and severe in eight. All 15 patients had been undergoing biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice when they received gemcitabine. Grade 3 cholangitis developed in one patient with moderate liver dysfunction who received gemcitabine at the dose level of 1000 mg/m(2). No other patients had severe treatment‐related adverse events resulting in the omission or discontinuation of gemcitabine treatment. The plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and difluorodeoxyuridine were similar among the groups. An initial dose reduction of gemcitabine as monotherapy for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancers is not necessary for patients with hyperbilirubinemia, provided that obstructive jaundice is well managed. (Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000005363.) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-02 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4768397/ /pubmed/26595259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12851 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Shibata, Takashi
Ebata, Tomoki
Fujita, Ken‐ichi
Shimokata, Tomoya
Maeda, Osamu
Mitsuma, Ayako
Sasaki, Yasutsuna
Nagino, Masato
Ando, Yuichi
Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction
title Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction
title_full Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction
title_fullStr Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction
title_short Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction
title_sort optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26595259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12851
work_keys_str_mv AT shibatatakashi optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction
AT ebatatomoki optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction
AT fujitakenichi optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction
AT shimokatatomoya optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction
AT maedaosamu optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction
AT mitsumaayako optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction
AT sasakiyasutsuna optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction
AT naginomasato optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction
AT andoyuichi optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction