Cargando…
Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction
A clear consensus does not exist about whether the initial dose of gemcitabine, an essential anticancer antimetabolite, should be reduced in patients with liver dysfunction. Adult patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer were divided into three groups according to whether they had mild, mode...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26595259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12851 |
_version_ | 1782417940827602944 |
---|---|
author | Shibata, Takashi Ebata, Tomoki Fujita, Ken‐ichi Shimokata, Tomoya Maeda, Osamu Mitsuma, Ayako Sasaki, Yasutsuna Nagino, Masato Ando, Yuichi |
author_facet | Shibata, Takashi Ebata, Tomoki Fujita, Ken‐ichi Shimokata, Tomoya Maeda, Osamu Mitsuma, Ayako Sasaki, Yasutsuna Nagino, Masato Ando, Yuichi |
author_sort | Shibata, Takashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | A clear consensus does not exist about whether the initial dose of gemcitabine, an essential anticancer antimetabolite, should be reduced in patients with liver dysfunction. Adult patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer were divided into three groups according to whether they had mild, moderate, or severe liver dysfunction, evaluated on the basis of serum bilirubin and liver transaminase levels at baseline. As anticancer treatment, gemcitabine at a dose of 800 or 1000 mg/m(2) was given as an i.v. infusion once weekly for 3 weeks of a 4‐week cycle. The patients were prospectively evaluated for adverse events during the first cycle, and the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its inactive metabolite, difluorodeoxyuridine, were studied to determine the optimal initial dose of gemcitabine as monotherapy according to the severity of liver dysfunction. A total of 15 patients were studied. Liver dysfunction was mild in one patient, moderate in six, and severe in eight. All 15 patients had been undergoing biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice when they received gemcitabine. Grade 3 cholangitis developed in one patient with moderate liver dysfunction who received gemcitabine at the dose level of 1000 mg/m(2). No other patients had severe treatment‐related adverse events resulting in the omission or discontinuation of gemcitabine treatment. The plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and difluorodeoxyuridine were similar among the groups. An initial dose reduction of gemcitabine as monotherapy for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancers is not necessary for patients with hyperbilirubinemia, provided that obstructive jaundice is well managed. (Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000005363.) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4768397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47683972016-04-01 Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction Shibata, Takashi Ebata, Tomoki Fujita, Ken‐ichi Shimokata, Tomoya Maeda, Osamu Mitsuma, Ayako Sasaki, Yasutsuna Nagino, Masato Ando, Yuichi Cancer Sci Original Articles A clear consensus does not exist about whether the initial dose of gemcitabine, an essential anticancer antimetabolite, should be reduced in patients with liver dysfunction. Adult patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer were divided into three groups according to whether they had mild, moderate, or severe liver dysfunction, evaluated on the basis of serum bilirubin and liver transaminase levels at baseline. As anticancer treatment, gemcitabine at a dose of 800 or 1000 mg/m(2) was given as an i.v. infusion once weekly for 3 weeks of a 4‐week cycle. The patients were prospectively evaluated for adverse events during the first cycle, and the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its inactive metabolite, difluorodeoxyuridine, were studied to determine the optimal initial dose of gemcitabine as monotherapy according to the severity of liver dysfunction. A total of 15 patients were studied. Liver dysfunction was mild in one patient, moderate in six, and severe in eight. All 15 patients had been undergoing biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice when they received gemcitabine. Grade 3 cholangitis developed in one patient with moderate liver dysfunction who received gemcitabine at the dose level of 1000 mg/m(2). No other patients had severe treatment‐related adverse events resulting in the omission or discontinuation of gemcitabine treatment. The plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and difluorodeoxyuridine were similar among the groups. An initial dose reduction of gemcitabine as monotherapy for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancers is not necessary for patients with hyperbilirubinemia, provided that obstructive jaundice is well managed. (Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000005363.) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-02 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4768397/ /pubmed/26595259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12851 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Shibata, Takashi Ebata, Tomoki Fujita, Ken‐ichi Shimokata, Tomoya Maeda, Osamu Mitsuma, Ayako Sasaki, Yasutsuna Nagino, Masato Ando, Yuichi Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction |
title | Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction |
title_full | Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction |
title_fullStr | Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction |
title_short | Optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction |
title_sort | optimal dose of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract or pancreatic cancer in patients with liver dysfunction |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26595259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12851 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shibatatakashi optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction AT ebatatomoki optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction AT fujitakenichi optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction AT shimokatatomoya optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction AT maedaosamu optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction AT mitsumaayako optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction AT sasakiyasutsuna optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction AT naginomasato optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction AT andoyuichi optimaldoseofgemcitabineforthetreatmentofbiliarytractorpancreaticcancerinpatientswithliverdysfunction |