Cargando…
Differences in predictions of ODE models of tumor growth: a cautionary example
BACKGROUND: While mathematical models are often used to predict progression of cancer and treatment outcomes, there is still uncertainty over how to best model tumor growth. Seven ordinary differential equation (ODE) models of tumor growth (exponential, Mendelsohn, logistic, linear, surface, Gompert...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26921070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2164-x |
_version_ | 1782417946913538048 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Hope Jaafari, Hana Dobrovolny, Hana M. |
author_facet | Murphy, Hope Jaafari, Hana Dobrovolny, Hana M. |
author_sort | Murphy, Hope |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While mathematical models are often used to predict progression of cancer and treatment outcomes, there is still uncertainty over how to best model tumor growth. Seven ordinary differential equation (ODE) models of tumor growth (exponential, Mendelsohn, logistic, linear, surface, Gompertz, and Bertalanffy) have been proposed, but there is no clear guidance on how to choose the most appropriate model for a particular cancer. METHODS: We examined all seven of the previously proposed ODE models in the presence and absence of chemotherapy. We derived equations for the maximum tumor size, doubling time, and the minimum amount of chemotherapy needed to suppress the tumor and used a sample data set to compare how these quantities differ based on choice of growth model. RESULTS: We find that there is a 12-fold difference in predicting doubling times and a 6-fold difference in the predicted amount of chemotherapy needed for suppression depending on which growth model was used. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the need for careful consideration of model assumptions when developing mathematical models for use in cancer treatment planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4768423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47684232016-02-27 Differences in predictions of ODE models of tumor growth: a cautionary example Murphy, Hope Jaafari, Hana Dobrovolny, Hana M. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: While mathematical models are often used to predict progression of cancer and treatment outcomes, there is still uncertainty over how to best model tumor growth. Seven ordinary differential equation (ODE) models of tumor growth (exponential, Mendelsohn, logistic, linear, surface, Gompertz, and Bertalanffy) have been proposed, but there is no clear guidance on how to choose the most appropriate model for a particular cancer. METHODS: We examined all seven of the previously proposed ODE models in the presence and absence of chemotherapy. We derived equations for the maximum tumor size, doubling time, and the minimum amount of chemotherapy needed to suppress the tumor and used a sample data set to compare how these quantities differ based on choice of growth model. RESULTS: We find that there is a 12-fold difference in predicting doubling times and a 6-fold difference in the predicted amount of chemotherapy needed for suppression depending on which growth model was used. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the need for careful consideration of model assumptions when developing mathematical models for use in cancer treatment planning. BioMed Central 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4768423/ /pubmed/26921070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2164-x Text en © Murphy et al. 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Murphy, Hope Jaafari, Hana Dobrovolny, Hana M. Differences in predictions of ODE models of tumor growth: a cautionary example |
title | Differences in predictions of ODE models of tumor growth: a cautionary example |
title_full | Differences in predictions of ODE models of tumor growth: a cautionary example |
title_fullStr | Differences in predictions of ODE models of tumor growth: a cautionary example |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in predictions of ODE models of tumor growth: a cautionary example |
title_short | Differences in predictions of ODE models of tumor growth: a cautionary example |
title_sort | differences in predictions of ode models of tumor growth: a cautionary example |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26921070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2164-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphyhope differencesinpredictionsofodemodelsoftumorgrowthacautionaryexample AT jaafarihana differencesinpredictionsofodemodelsoftumorgrowthacautionaryexample AT dobrovolnyhanam differencesinpredictionsofodemodelsoftumorgrowthacautionaryexample |