Cargando…

Classical Swine Fever Virus vs. Classical Swine Fever Virus: The Superinfection Exclusion Phenomenon in Experimentally Infected Wild Boar

Two groups with three wild boars each were used: Group A (animals 1 to 3) served as the control, and Group B (animals 4 to 6) was postnatally persistently infected with the Cat01 strain of CSFV (primary virus). The animals, six weeks old and clinically healthy, were inoculated with the virulent stra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muñoz-González, Sara, Pérez-Simó, Marta, Colom-Cadena, Andreu, Cabezón, Oscar, Bohórquez, José Alejandro, Rosell, Rosa, Pérez, Lester Josué, Marco, Ignasi, Lavín, Santiago, Domingo, Mariano, Ganges, Llilianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26919741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149469
_version_ 1782418023228899328
author Muñoz-González, Sara
Pérez-Simó, Marta
Colom-Cadena, Andreu
Cabezón, Oscar
Bohórquez, José Alejandro
Rosell, Rosa
Pérez, Lester Josué
Marco, Ignasi
Lavín, Santiago
Domingo, Mariano
Ganges, Llilianne
author_facet Muñoz-González, Sara
Pérez-Simó, Marta
Colom-Cadena, Andreu
Cabezón, Oscar
Bohórquez, José Alejandro
Rosell, Rosa
Pérez, Lester Josué
Marco, Ignasi
Lavín, Santiago
Domingo, Mariano
Ganges, Llilianne
author_sort Muñoz-González, Sara
collection PubMed
description Two groups with three wild boars each were used: Group A (animals 1 to 3) served as the control, and Group B (animals 4 to 6) was postnatally persistently infected with the Cat01 strain of CSFV (primary virus). The animals, six weeks old and clinically healthy, were inoculated with the virulent strain Margarita (secondary virus). For exclusive detection of the Margarita strain, a specific qRT-PCR assay was designed, which proved not to have cross-reactivity with the Cat01 strain. The wild boars persistently infected with CSFV were protected from superinfection by the virulent CSFV Margarita strain, as evidenced by the absence of clinical signs and the absence of Margarita RNA detection in serum, swabs and tissue samples. Additionally, in PBMCs, a well-known target for CSFV viral replication, only the primary infecting virus RNA (Cat01 strain) could be detected, even after the isolation in ST cells, demonstrating SIE at the tissue level in vivo. Furthermore, the data analysis of the Margarita qRT-PCR, by means of calculated ΔCt values, supported that PBMCs from persistently infected animals were substantially protected from superinfection after in vitro inoculation with the Margarita virus strain, while this virus was able to infect naive PBMCs efficiently. In parallel, IFN-α values were undetectable in the sera from animals in Group B after inoculation with the CSFV Margarita strain. Furthermore, these animals were unable to elicit adaptive humoral (no E2-specific or neutralising antibodies) or cellular immune responses (in terms of IFN-γ-producing cells) after inoculation with the second virus. Finally, a sequence analysis could not detect CSFV Margarita RNA in the samples tested from Group B. Our results suggested that the SIE phenomenon might be involved in the evolution and phylogeny of the virus, as well as in CSFV control by vaccination. To the best of our knowledge, this study was one of the first showing efficient suppression of superinfection in animals, especially in the absence of IFN-α, which might be associated with the lack of innate immune mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4768946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47689462016-03-09 Classical Swine Fever Virus vs. Classical Swine Fever Virus: The Superinfection Exclusion Phenomenon in Experimentally Infected Wild Boar Muñoz-González, Sara Pérez-Simó, Marta Colom-Cadena, Andreu Cabezón, Oscar Bohórquez, José Alejandro Rosell, Rosa Pérez, Lester Josué Marco, Ignasi Lavín, Santiago Domingo, Mariano Ganges, Llilianne PLoS One Research Article Two groups with three wild boars each were used: Group A (animals 1 to 3) served as the control, and Group B (animals 4 to 6) was postnatally persistently infected with the Cat01 strain of CSFV (primary virus). The animals, six weeks old and clinically healthy, were inoculated with the virulent strain Margarita (secondary virus). For exclusive detection of the Margarita strain, a specific qRT-PCR assay was designed, which proved not to have cross-reactivity with the Cat01 strain. The wild boars persistently infected with CSFV were protected from superinfection by the virulent CSFV Margarita strain, as evidenced by the absence of clinical signs and the absence of Margarita RNA detection in serum, swabs and tissue samples. Additionally, in PBMCs, a well-known target for CSFV viral replication, only the primary infecting virus RNA (Cat01 strain) could be detected, even after the isolation in ST cells, demonstrating SIE at the tissue level in vivo. Furthermore, the data analysis of the Margarita qRT-PCR, by means of calculated ΔCt values, supported that PBMCs from persistently infected animals were substantially protected from superinfection after in vitro inoculation with the Margarita virus strain, while this virus was able to infect naive PBMCs efficiently. In parallel, IFN-α values were undetectable in the sera from animals in Group B after inoculation with the CSFV Margarita strain. Furthermore, these animals were unable to elicit adaptive humoral (no E2-specific or neutralising antibodies) or cellular immune responses (in terms of IFN-γ-producing cells) after inoculation with the second virus. Finally, a sequence analysis could not detect CSFV Margarita RNA in the samples tested from Group B. Our results suggested that the SIE phenomenon might be involved in the evolution and phylogeny of the virus, as well as in CSFV control by vaccination. To the best of our knowledge, this study was one of the first showing efficient suppression of superinfection in animals, especially in the absence of IFN-α, which might be associated with the lack of innate immune mechanisms. Public Library of Science 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4768946/ /pubmed/26919741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149469 Text en © 2016 Muñoz-González et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muñoz-González, Sara
Pérez-Simó, Marta
Colom-Cadena, Andreu
Cabezón, Oscar
Bohórquez, José Alejandro
Rosell, Rosa
Pérez, Lester Josué
Marco, Ignasi
Lavín, Santiago
Domingo, Mariano
Ganges, Llilianne
Classical Swine Fever Virus vs. Classical Swine Fever Virus: The Superinfection Exclusion Phenomenon in Experimentally Infected Wild Boar
title Classical Swine Fever Virus vs. Classical Swine Fever Virus: The Superinfection Exclusion Phenomenon in Experimentally Infected Wild Boar
title_full Classical Swine Fever Virus vs. Classical Swine Fever Virus: The Superinfection Exclusion Phenomenon in Experimentally Infected Wild Boar
title_fullStr Classical Swine Fever Virus vs. Classical Swine Fever Virus: The Superinfection Exclusion Phenomenon in Experimentally Infected Wild Boar
title_full_unstemmed Classical Swine Fever Virus vs. Classical Swine Fever Virus: The Superinfection Exclusion Phenomenon in Experimentally Infected Wild Boar
title_short Classical Swine Fever Virus vs. Classical Swine Fever Virus: The Superinfection Exclusion Phenomenon in Experimentally Infected Wild Boar
title_sort classical swine fever virus vs. classical swine fever virus: the superinfection exclusion phenomenon in experimentally infected wild boar
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26919741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149469
work_keys_str_mv AT munozgonzalezsara classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT perezsimomarta classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT colomcadenaandreu classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT cabezonoscar classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT bohorquezjosealejandro classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT rosellrosa classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT perezlesterjosue classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT marcoignasi classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT lavinsantiago classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT domingomariano classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar
AT gangesllilianne classicalswinefevervirusvsclassicalswinefevervirusthesuperinfectionexclusionphenomenoninexperimentallyinfectedwildboar