Cargando…

Management Impacts on Carbon Dynamics in a Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest

Forest ecosystems can act as sinks of carbon and thus mitigate anthropogenic carbon emissions. When forests are actively managed, treatments can alter forests carbon dynamics, reducing their sink strength and switching them from sinks to sources of carbon. These effects are generally characterized b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dore, Sabina, Fry, Danny L., Collins, Brandon M., Vargas, Rodrigo, York, Robert A., Stephens, Scott L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150256
_version_ 1782418051415670784
author Dore, Sabina
Fry, Danny L.
Collins, Brandon M.
Vargas, Rodrigo
York, Robert A.
Stephens, Scott L.
author_facet Dore, Sabina
Fry, Danny L.
Collins, Brandon M.
Vargas, Rodrigo
York, Robert A.
Stephens, Scott L.
author_sort Dore, Sabina
collection PubMed
description Forest ecosystems can act as sinks of carbon and thus mitigate anthropogenic carbon emissions. When forests are actively managed, treatments can alter forests carbon dynamics, reducing their sink strength and switching them from sinks to sources of carbon. These effects are generally characterized by fast temporal dynamics. Hence this study monitored for over a decade the impacts of management practices commonly used to reduce fire hazards on the carbon dynamics of mixed-conifer forests in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Soil CO(2) efflux, carbon pools (i.e. soil carbon, litter, fine roots, tree biomass), and radial tree growth were compared among un-manipulated controls, prescribed fire, thinning, thinning followed by fire, and two clear-cut harvested sites. Soil CO(2) efflux was reduced by both fire and harvesting (ca. 15%). Soil carbon content (upper 15 cm) was not significantly changed by harvest or fire treatments. Fine root biomass was reduced by clear-cut harvest (60–70%) but not by fire, and the litter layer was reduced 80% by clear-cut harvest and 40% by fire. Thinning effects on tree growth and biomass were concentrated in the first year after treatments, whereas fire effects persisted over the seven-year post-treatment period. Over this period, tree radial growth was increased (25%) by thinning and reduced (12%) by fire. After seven years, tree biomass returned to pre-treatment levels in both fire and thinning treatments; however, biomass and productivity decreased 30%-40% compared to controls when thinning was combined with fire. The clear-cut treatment had the strongest impact, reducing ecosystem carbon stocks and delaying the capacity for carbon uptake. We conclude that post-treatment carbon dynamics and ecosystem recovery time varied with intensity and type of treatments. Consequently, management practices can be selected to minimize ecosystem carbon losses while increasing future carbon uptake, resilience to high severity fire, and climate related stresses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4769083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47690832016-03-09 Management Impacts on Carbon Dynamics in a Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest Dore, Sabina Fry, Danny L. Collins, Brandon M. Vargas, Rodrigo York, Robert A. Stephens, Scott L. PLoS One Research Article Forest ecosystems can act as sinks of carbon and thus mitigate anthropogenic carbon emissions. When forests are actively managed, treatments can alter forests carbon dynamics, reducing their sink strength and switching them from sinks to sources of carbon. These effects are generally characterized by fast temporal dynamics. Hence this study monitored for over a decade the impacts of management practices commonly used to reduce fire hazards on the carbon dynamics of mixed-conifer forests in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Soil CO(2) efflux, carbon pools (i.e. soil carbon, litter, fine roots, tree biomass), and radial tree growth were compared among un-manipulated controls, prescribed fire, thinning, thinning followed by fire, and two clear-cut harvested sites. Soil CO(2) efflux was reduced by both fire and harvesting (ca. 15%). Soil carbon content (upper 15 cm) was not significantly changed by harvest or fire treatments. Fine root biomass was reduced by clear-cut harvest (60–70%) but not by fire, and the litter layer was reduced 80% by clear-cut harvest and 40% by fire. Thinning effects on tree growth and biomass were concentrated in the first year after treatments, whereas fire effects persisted over the seven-year post-treatment period. Over this period, tree radial growth was increased (25%) by thinning and reduced (12%) by fire. After seven years, tree biomass returned to pre-treatment levels in both fire and thinning treatments; however, biomass and productivity decreased 30%-40% compared to controls when thinning was combined with fire. The clear-cut treatment had the strongest impact, reducing ecosystem carbon stocks and delaying the capacity for carbon uptake. We conclude that post-treatment carbon dynamics and ecosystem recovery time varied with intensity and type of treatments. Consequently, management practices can be selected to minimize ecosystem carbon losses while increasing future carbon uptake, resilience to high severity fire, and climate related stresses. Public Library of Science 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4769083/ /pubmed/26918460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150256 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dore, Sabina
Fry, Danny L.
Collins, Brandon M.
Vargas, Rodrigo
York, Robert A.
Stephens, Scott L.
Management Impacts on Carbon Dynamics in a Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest
title Management Impacts on Carbon Dynamics in a Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest
title_full Management Impacts on Carbon Dynamics in a Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest
title_fullStr Management Impacts on Carbon Dynamics in a Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest
title_full_unstemmed Management Impacts on Carbon Dynamics in a Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest
title_short Management Impacts on Carbon Dynamics in a Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest
title_sort management impacts on carbon dynamics in a sierra nevada mixed conifer forest
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150256
work_keys_str_mv AT doresabina managementimpactsoncarbondynamicsinasierranevadamixedconiferforest
AT frydannyl managementimpactsoncarbondynamicsinasierranevadamixedconiferforest
AT collinsbrandonm managementimpactsoncarbondynamicsinasierranevadamixedconiferforest
AT vargasrodrigo managementimpactsoncarbondynamicsinasierranevadamixedconiferforest
AT yorkroberta managementimpactsoncarbondynamicsinasierranevadamixedconiferforest
AT stephensscottl managementimpactsoncarbondynamicsinasierranevadamixedconiferforest