Cargando…
Molecular Identification and Echinocandin Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis Complex Bloodstream Isolates in Italy, 2007–2014
The Candida parapsilosis group encompasses three species: C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis. Here, we describe the incidence and echinocandin susceptibility profile of bloodstream isolates of these three species collected from patients admitted to an Italian university hospital...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26919294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150218 |
_version_ | 1782418052354146304 |
---|---|
author | Lovero, Grazia Borghi, Elisa Balbino, Stella Cirasola, Daniela De Giglio, Osvalda Perdoni, Federica Caggiano, Giuseppina Morace, Giulia Montagna, Maria Teresa |
author_facet | Lovero, Grazia Borghi, Elisa Balbino, Stella Cirasola, Daniela De Giglio, Osvalda Perdoni, Federica Caggiano, Giuseppina Morace, Giulia Montagna, Maria Teresa |
author_sort | Lovero, Grazia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Candida parapsilosis group encompasses three species: C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis. Here, we describe the incidence and echinocandin susceptibility profile of bloodstream isolates of these three species collected from patients admitted to an Italian university hospital from 2007 to 2014. Molecular identification of cryptic species of the C. parapsilosis complex was performed using polymerase chain reaction amplification of the gene encoding secondary alcohol dehydrogenase, followed by digestion with the restriction enzyme BanI. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined using the broth microdilution method according to European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST EDef 7.2) and Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI M27-A3) guidelines, and the results were compared with those obtained using the E-test and Sensititre methods. Of the 163 C. parapsilosis complex isolates, 136 (83.4%) were identified as C. parapsilosis, and 27 (16.6%) as C. orthopsilosis. The species-specific incidences were 2.9/10,000 admissions for C. parapsilosis and 0.6/10,000 admissions for C. orthopsilosis. No resistance to echinocandins was detected with any of the methods. The percent essential agreement (EA) between the EUCAST and E-test/Sensititre methods for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin susceptibility was, respectively, as follows: C. parapsilosis, 95.6/97.8, 98.5/88.2, and 93.4/96.3; C. orthopsilosis, 92.6/92.6, 96.3/77.8, and 63.0/66.7. The EA between the CLSI and E-test/Sensititre methods was, respectively, as follows: C. parapsilosis, 99.3/100, 98.5/89.0, and 96.3/98.5; C. orthopsilosis, 96.3/92.6, 100/81.5, and 92.6/88.9. Only minor discrepancies, ranging from 16.9% (C. parapsilosis) to 11.1% (C. orthopsilosis), were observed between the CLSI and E-test/Sensititre methods. In conclusion, this epidemiologic study shows a typical C. parapsilosis complex species distribution, no echinocandin resistance, and it reinforces the relevance of using commercially available microbiological methods to assess antifungal susceptibility. These data improve our knowledge of the national distribution of species of the psilosis group, as there are very few studies of these species in Italy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4769087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47690872016-03-09 Molecular Identification and Echinocandin Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis Complex Bloodstream Isolates in Italy, 2007–2014 Lovero, Grazia Borghi, Elisa Balbino, Stella Cirasola, Daniela De Giglio, Osvalda Perdoni, Federica Caggiano, Giuseppina Morace, Giulia Montagna, Maria Teresa PLoS One Research Article The Candida parapsilosis group encompasses three species: C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis. Here, we describe the incidence and echinocandin susceptibility profile of bloodstream isolates of these three species collected from patients admitted to an Italian university hospital from 2007 to 2014. Molecular identification of cryptic species of the C. parapsilosis complex was performed using polymerase chain reaction amplification of the gene encoding secondary alcohol dehydrogenase, followed by digestion with the restriction enzyme BanI. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined using the broth microdilution method according to European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST EDef 7.2) and Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI M27-A3) guidelines, and the results were compared with those obtained using the E-test and Sensititre methods. Of the 163 C. parapsilosis complex isolates, 136 (83.4%) were identified as C. parapsilosis, and 27 (16.6%) as C. orthopsilosis. The species-specific incidences were 2.9/10,000 admissions for C. parapsilosis and 0.6/10,000 admissions for C. orthopsilosis. No resistance to echinocandins was detected with any of the methods. The percent essential agreement (EA) between the EUCAST and E-test/Sensititre methods for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin susceptibility was, respectively, as follows: C. parapsilosis, 95.6/97.8, 98.5/88.2, and 93.4/96.3; C. orthopsilosis, 92.6/92.6, 96.3/77.8, and 63.0/66.7. The EA between the CLSI and E-test/Sensititre methods was, respectively, as follows: C. parapsilosis, 99.3/100, 98.5/89.0, and 96.3/98.5; C. orthopsilosis, 96.3/92.6, 100/81.5, and 92.6/88.9. Only minor discrepancies, ranging from 16.9% (C. parapsilosis) to 11.1% (C. orthopsilosis), were observed between the CLSI and E-test/Sensititre methods. In conclusion, this epidemiologic study shows a typical C. parapsilosis complex species distribution, no echinocandin resistance, and it reinforces the relevance of using commercially available microbiological methods to assess antifungal susceptibility. These data improve our knowledge of the national distribution of species of the psilosis group, as there are very few studies of these species in Italy. Public Library of Science 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4769087/ /pubmed/26919294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150218 Text en © 2016 Lovero et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lovero, Grazia Borghi, Elisa Balbino, Stella Cirasola, Daniela De Giglio, Osvalda Perdoni, Federica Caggiano, Giuseppina Morace, Giulia Montagna, Maria Teresa Molecular Identification and Echinocandin Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis Complex Bloodstream Isolates in Italy, 2007–2014 |
title | Molecular Identification and Echinocandin Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis Complex Bloodstream Isolates in Italy, 2007–2014 |
title_full | Molecular Identification and Echinocandin Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis Complex Bloodstream Isolates in Italy, 2007–2014 |
title_fullStr | Molecular Identification and Echinocandin Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis Complex Bloodstream Isolates in Italy, 2007–2014 |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular Identification and Echinocandin Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis Complex Bloodstream Isolates in Italy, 2007–2014 |
title_short | Molecular Identification and Echinocandin Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis Complex Bloodstream Isolates in Italy, 2007–2014 |
title_sort | molecular identification and echinocandin susceptibility of candida parapsilosis complex bloodstream isolates in italy, 2007–2014 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26919294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loverograzia molecularidentificationandechinocandinsusceptibilityofcandidaparapsilosiscomplexbloodstreamisolatesinitaly20072014 AT borghielisa molecularidentificationandechinocandinsusceptibilityofcandidaparapsilosiscomplexbloodstreamisolatesinitaly20072014 AT balbinostella molecularidentificationandechinocandinsusceptibilityofcandidaparapsilosiscomplexbloodstreamisolatesinitaly20072014 AT cirasoladaniela molecularidentificationandechinocandinsusceptibilityofcandidaparapsilosiscomplexbloodstreamisolatesinitaly20072014 AT degiglioosvalda molecularidentificationandechinocandinsusceptibilityofcandidaparapsilosiscomplexbloodstreamisolatesinitaly20072014 AT perdonifederica molecularidentificationandechinocandinsusceptibilityofcandidaparapsilosiscomplexbloodstreamisolatesinitaly20072014 AT caggianogiuseppina molecularidentificationandechinocandinsusceptibilityofcandidaparapsilosiscomplexbloodstreamisolatesinitaly20072014 AT moracegiulia molecularidentificationandechinocandinsusceptibilityofcandidaparapsilosiscomplexbloodstreamisolatesinitaly20072014 AT montagnamariateresa molecularidentificationandechinocandinsusceptibilityofcandidaparapsilosiscomplexbloodstreamisolatesinitaly20072014 |