Cargando…

Optimised Pre-Analytical Methods Improve KRAS Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) from Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

INTRODUCTION: Non-invasive mutation testing using circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an attractive premise. This could enable patients without available tumour sample to access more treatment options. MATERIALS & METHODS: Peripheral blood and matched tumours were analysed from 45 NSCLC patients....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sherwood, James L., Corcoran, Claire, Brown, Helen, Sharpe, Alan D., Musilova, Milena, Kohlmann, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150197
_version_ 1782418065132093440
author Sherwood, James L.
Corcoran, Claire
Brown, Helen
Sharpe, Alan D.
Musilova, Milena
Kohlmann, Alexander
author_facet Sherwood, James L.
Corcoran, Claire
Brown, Helen
Sharpe, Alan D.
Musilova, Milena
Kohlmann, Alexander
author_sort Sherwood, James L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Non-invasive mutation testing using circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an attractive premise. This could enable patients without available tumour sample to access more treatment options. MATERIALS & METHODS: Peripheral blood and matched tumours were analysed from 45 NSCLC patients. We investigated the impact of pre-analytical variables on DNA yield and/or KRAS mutation detection: sample collection tube type, incubation time, centrifugation steps, plasma input volume and DNA extraction kits. RESULTS: 2 hr incubation time and double plasma centrifugation (2000 x g) reduced overall DNA yield resulting in lowered levels of contaminating genomic DNA (gDNA). Reduced “contamination” and increased KRAS mutation detection was observed using cell-free DNA Blood Collection Tubes (cfDNA BCT) (Streck), after 72 hrs following blood draw compared to EDTA tubes. Plasma input volume and use of different DNA extraction kits impacted DNA yield. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that successful ctDNA recovery for mutation detection in NSCLC is dependent on pre-analytical steps. Development of standardised methods for the detection of KRAS mutations from ctDNA specimens is recommended to minimise the impact of pre-analytical steps on mutation detection rates. Where rapid sample processing is not possible the use of cfDNA BCT tubes would be advantageous.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4769175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47691752016-03-09 Optimised Pre-Analytical Methods Improve KRAS Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) from Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Sherwood, James L. Corcoran, Claire Brown, Helen Sharpe, Alan D. Musilova, Milena Kohlmann, Alexander PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Non-invasive mutation testing using circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an attractive premise. This could enable patients without available tumour sample to access more treatment options. MATERIALS & METHODS: Peripheral blood and matched tumours were analysed from 45 NSCLC patients. We investigated the impact of pre-analytical variables on DNA yield and/or KRAS mutation detection: sample collection tube type, incubation time, centrifugation steps, plasma input volume and DNA extraction kits. RESULTS: 2 hr incubation time and double plasma centrifugation (2000 x g) reduced overall DNA yield resulting in lowered levels of contaminating genomic DNA (gDNA). Reduced “contamination” and increased KRAS mutation detection was observed using cell-free DNA Blood Collection Tubes (cfDNA BCT) (Streck), after 72 hrs following blood draw compared to EDTA tubes. Plasma input volume and use of different DNA extraction kits impacted DNA yield. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that successful ctDNA recovery for mutation detection in NSCLC is dependent on pre-analytical steps. Development of standardised methods for the detection of KRAS mutations from ctDNA specimens is recommended to minimise the impact of pre-analytical steps on mutation detection rates. Where rapid sample processing is not possible the use of cfDNA BCT tubes would be advantageous. Public Library of Science 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4769175/ /pubmed/26918901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150197 Text en © 2016 Sherwood et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sherwood, James L.
Corcoran, Claire
Brown, Helen
Sharpe, Alan D.
Musilova, Milena
Kohlmann, Alexander
Optimised Pre-Analytical Methods Improve KRAS Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) from Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
title Optimised Pre-Analytical Methods Improve KRAS Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) from Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
title_full Optimised Pre-Analytical Methods Improve KRAS Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) from Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
title_fullStr Optimised Pre-Analytical Methods Improve KRAS Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) from Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
title_full_unstemmed Optimised Pre-Analytical Methods Improve KRAS Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) from Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
title_short Optimised Pre-Analytical Methods Improve KRAS Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) from Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
title_sort optimised pre-analytical methods improve kras mutation detection in circulating tumour dna (ctdna) from patients with non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150197
work_keys_str_mv AT sherwoodjamesl optimisedpreanalyticalmethodsimprovekrasmutationdetectionincirculatingtumourdnactdnafrompatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT corcoranclaire optimisedpreanalyticalmethodsimprovekrasmutationdetectionincirculatingtumourdnactdnafrompatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT brownhelen optimisedpreanalyticalmethodsimprovekrasmutationdetectionincirculatingtumourdnactdnafrompatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT sharpealand optimisedpreanalyticalmethodsimprovekrasmutationdetectionincirculatingtumourdnactdnafrompatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT musilovamilena optimisedpreanalyticalmethodsimprovekrasmutationdetectionincirculatingtumourdnactdnafrompatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT kohlmannalexander optimisedpreanalyticalmethodsimprovekrasmutationdetectionincirculatingtumourdnactdnafrompatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc