Cargando…
Intra-individual variation in urinary iodine concentration: effect of statistical correction on population distribution using seasonal three-consecutive-day spot urine in children
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of statistical correction for intra-individual variation on estimated urinary iodine concentration (UIC) by sampling on 3 consecutive days in four seasons in children. SETTING: School-aged children from urban and rural primary schools in Harbin, Heilongjiang, China...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26920442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010217 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of statistical correction for intra-individual variation on estimated urinary iodine concentration (UIC) by sampling on 3 consecutive days in four seasons in children. SETTING: School-aged children from urban and rural primary schools in Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. PARTICIPANTS: 748 and 640 children aged 8–11 years were recruited from urban and rural schools, respectively, in Harbin. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The spot urine samples were collected once a day for 3 consecutive days in each season over 1 year. The UIC of the first day was corrected by two statistical correction methods: the average correction method (average of days 1, 2; average of days 1, 2 and 3) and the variance correction method (UIC of day 1 corrected by two replicates and by three replicates). The variance correction method determined the SD between subjects (S(b)) and within subjects (S(w)), and calculated the correction coefficient (F(i)), F(i)=S(b)/(S(b)+S(w)/d(i)), where d(i) was the number of observations. The UIC of day 1 was then corrected using the following equation: [Image: see text] RESULTS: The variance correction methods showed the overall F(i) was 0.742 for 2 days’ correction and 0.829 for 3 days’ correction; the values for the seasons spring, summer, autumn and winter were 0.730, 0.684, 0.706 and 0.703 for 2 days’ correction and 0.809, 0.742, 0.796 and 0.804 for 3 days’ correction, respectively. After removal of the individual effect, the correlation coefficient between consecutive days was 0.224, and between non-consecutive days 0.050. CONCLUSIONS: The variance correction method is effective for correcting intra-individual variation in estimated UIC following sampling on 3 consecutive days in four seasons in children. The method varies little between ages, sexes and urban or rural setting, but does vary between seasons. |
---|