Cargando…

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of short-term comprehensive inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), and to compare responses with those of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who underwent an identical pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomioka, Hiromi, Mamesaya, Nobuaki, Yamashita, Shyuji, Kida, Yoko, Kaneko, Masahiro, Sakai, Hideki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26933506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000099
_version_ 1782418103961911296
author Tomioka, Hiromi
Mamesaya, Nobuaki
Yamashita, Shyuji
Kida, Yoko
Kaneko, Masahiro
Sakai, Hideki
author_facet Tomioka, Hiromi
Mamesaya, Nobuaki
Yamashita, Shyuji
Kida, Yoko
Kaneko, Masahiro
Sakai, Hideki
author_sort Tomioka, Hiromi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of short-term comprehensive inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), and to compare responses with those of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who underwent an identical programme. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of several outcome measures. SETTING: Pulmonary ward at a 358-bed community teaching hospital. METHODS: 3-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme assessed by pulmonary function tests, 6 min walk test and health-related quality of life (HRQL) using the Short Form-36 (SF-36). RESULTS: 17 patients with CPFE and 49 patients with COPD were referred to and completed the programme between March 2007 and February 2015. Age, sex, smoking status, body mass index and the Medical Research Council dyspnoea grade were comparable between groups. In the CPFE group, improvement from the start of the programme to the programme end was observed in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (from 1.7±0.4 to 1.8±0.4, p=0.034); however, there was no significant improvement in the 6 min walk test (distance, SpO(2) nadir and Borg scale on exercise). With regard to HRQL, improvement was observed in physical function (p=0.015) whereas deterioration was observed in social functioning (p=0.044). In the COPD group, significant improvement was observed after the programme in the FEV(1), 6 min walk test and 4 of the 8 SF-36 subscales. There was a significant difference in changes in the 6 min walk distance: −16.6±58.4 in CPFE versus 30.2±55.6 in COPD (p=0.009). In 2 domains, there was a significant difference in SF-36 scores between groups: Δvitality, −6.3±22.4 in CPFE versus 11.3±21.1 in COPD, p=0.009; and Δsocial functioning, −18.8±34.2 in CPFE versus 5.3±35.9 in COPD, p=0.027. CONCLUSION: Patients with COPD derived greater benefits than those with CPFE, from the relatively short periods of inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4769422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47694222016-03-01 Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Tomioka, Hiromi Mamesaya, Nobuaki Yamashita, Shyuji Kida, Yoko Kaneko, Masahiro Sakai, Hideki BMJ Open Respir Res Interstitial Lung Disease OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of short-term comprehensive inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), and to compare responses with those of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who underwent an identical programme. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of several outcome measures. SETTING: Pulmonary ward at a 358-bed community teaching hospital. METHODS: 3-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme assessed by pulmonary function tests, 6 min walk test and health-related quality of life (HRQL) using the Short Form-36 (SF-36). RESULTS: 17 patients with CPFE and 49 patients with COPD were referred to and completed the programme between March 2007 and February 2015. Age, sex, smoking status, body mass index and the Medical Research Council dyspnoea grade were comparable between groups. In the CPFE group, improvement from the start of the programme to the programme end was observed in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (from 1.7±0.4 to 1.8±0.4, p=0.034); however, there was no significant improvement in the 6 min walk test (distance, SpO(2) nadir and Borg scale on exercise). With regard to HRQL, improvement was observed in physical function (p=0.015) whereas deterioration was observed in social functioning (p=0.044). In the COPD group, significant improvement was observed after the programme in the FEV(1), 6 min walk test and 4 of the 8 SF-36 subscales. There was a significant difference in changes in the 6 min walk distance: −16.6±58.4 in CPFE versus 30.2±55.6 in COPD (p=0.009). In 2 domains, there was a significant difference in SF-36 scores between groups: Δvitality, −6.3±22.4 in CPFE versus 11.3±21.1 in COPD, p=0.009; and Δsocial functioning, −18.8±34.2 in CPFE versus 5.3±35.9 in COPD, p=0.027. CONCLUSION: Patients with COPD derived greater benefits than those with CPFE, from the relatively short periods of inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4769422/ /pubmed/26933506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000099 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Interstitial Lung Disease
Tomioka, Hiromi
Mamesaya, Nobuaki
Yamashita, Shyuji
Kida, Yoko
Kaneko, Masahiro
Sakai, Hideki
Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_fullStr Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full_unstemmed Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_short Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_sort combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
topic Interstitial Lung Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26933506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000099
work_keys_str_mv AT tomiokahiromi combinedpulmonaryfibrosisandemphysemaeffectofpulmonaryrehabilitationincomparisonwithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT mamesayanobuaki combinedpulmonaryfibrosisandemphysemaeffectofpulmonaryrehabilitationincomparisonwithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT yamashitashyuji combinedpulmonaryfibrosisandemphysemaeffectofpulmonaryrehabilitationincomparisonwithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT kidayoko combinedpulmonaryfibrosisandemphysemaeffectofpulmonaryrehabilitationincomparisonwithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT kanekomasahiro combinedpulmonaryfibrosisandemphysemaeffectofpulmonaryrehabilitationincomparisonwithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT sakaihideki combinedpulmonaryfibrosisandemphysemaeffectofpulmonaryrehabilitationincomparisonwithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease