Cargando…

Bonfils intubation fibrescope: use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscope

BACKGROUND: A variety of instruments are used to perform airway management by tracheal intubation. In this study, we compared the MacIntosh balde (MB) laryngoscope with the Bonfils intubation fibrescope as intubation techniques. The aim of this study was to identify the technique (MB or Bonfils) tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Limbach, Tobias, Ott, Thomas, Griesinger, Jan, Jahn-Eimermacher, Antje, Piepho, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26920895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1937-2
_version_ 1782418109690281984
author Limbach, Tobias
Ott, Thomas
Griesinger, Jan
Jahn-Eimermacher, Antje
Piepho, Tim
author_facet Limbach, Tobias
Ott, Thomas
Griesinger, Jan
Jahn-Eimermacher, Antje
Piepho, Tim
author_sort Limbach, Tobias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A variety of instruments are used to perform airway management by tracheal intubation. In this study, we compared the MacIntosh balde (MB) laryngoscope with the Bonfils intubation fibrescope as intubation techniques. The aim of this study was to identify the technique (MB or Bonfils) that would allow students in their last year of medical school to perform tracheal intubation faster and with a higher success probability. Data were collected from 150 participants using an airway simulator [‘Laerdal Airway Management Trainer’ (Laerdal Medical AS, Stavanger, Norway)]. The participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of techniques to use. Four consecutive intubation ‘trials’ were performed with each technique. These trials were evaluated for differences in the following categories: the ‘time to successful ventilation‘, ‘success probability’ within 90 s,’time to visualisation’ of the vocal cords (glottis), and ‘quality of visualisation’ according to the Cormack and Lehane score (C&L, grade 1–4). The primary endpoint was the ‘time to successful ventilation‘in the fourth and final trial. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the ‘time to successful ventilation’ between the two techniques in trial 4 (‘time to successful ventilation’: median: MB: 16 s, Bonfils: 14 s, p = 0.244). However, the ‘success probability’ within 90 s was higher when using a Macintosh blade than when using a Bonfils (95 vs. 87 %). The glottis could be better visualised when using a Bonfils (C&L score of 1 (best view): MB: 41 %, Bonfils: 93 %), but visualisation was achieved more rapidly when using a Macintosh blade (median: ‘time to visualisation’: MB: 6 s, Bonfils: 8 s, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The time to ventilation using the MacIntosh blade and Bonfils mainly did to differ, however success probabilities and time to visualisation primary favoured the MacIntosh blade as intubation technique, although the Bonfils seem to have a steeper learning curve. The Bonfils is still a promising intubation technique and might be easier to learn as the MB, at least in a manikin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1937-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4769496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47694962016-02-28 Bonfils intubation fibrescope: use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscope Limbach, Tobias Ott, Thomas Griesinger, Jan Jahn-Eimermacher, Antje Piepho, Tim BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: A variety of instruments are used to perform airway management by tracheal intubation. In this study, we compared the MacIntosh balde (MB) laryngoscope with the Bonfils intubation fibrescope as intubation techniques. The aim of this study was to identify the technique (MB or Bonfils) that would allow students in their last year of medical school to perform tracheal intubation faster and with a higher success probability. Data were collected from 150 participants using an airway simulator [‘Laerdal Airway Management Trainer’ (Laerdal Medical AS, Stavanger, Norway)]. The participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of techniques to use. Four consecutive intubation ‘trials’ were performed with each technique. These trials were evaluated for differences in the following categories: the ‘time to successful ventilation‘, ‘success probability’ within 90 s,’time to visualisation’ of the vocal cords (glottis), and ‘quality of visualisation’ according to the Cormack and Lehane score (C&L, grade 1–4). The primary endpoint was the ‘time to successful ventilation‘in the fourth and final trial. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the ‘time to successful ventilation’ between the two techniques in trial 4 (‘time to successful ventilation’: median: MB: 16 s, Bonfils: 14 s, p = 0.244). However, the ‘success probability’ within 90 s was higher when using a Macintosh blade than when using a Bonfils (95 vs. 87 %). The glottis could be better visualised when using a Bonfils (C&L score of 1 (best view): MB: 41 %, Bonfils: 93 %), but visualisation was achieved more rapidly when using a Macintosh blade (median: ‘time to visualisation’: MB: 6 s, Bonfils: 8 s, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The time to ventilation using the MacIntosh blade and Bonfils mainly did to differ, however success probabilities and time to visualisation primary favoured the MacIntosh blade as intubation technique, although the Bonfils seem to have a steeper learning curve. The Bonfils is still a promising intubation technique and might be easier to learn as the MB, at least in a manikin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1937-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4769496/ /pubmed/26920895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1937-2 Text en © Limbach et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Limbach, Tobias
Ott, Thomas
Griesinger, Jan
Jahn-Eimermacher, Antje
Piepho, Tim
Bonfils intubation fibrescope: use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscope
title Bonfils intubation fibrescope: use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscope
title_full Bonfils intubation fibrescope: use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscope
title_fullStr Bonfils intubation fibrescope: use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscope
title_full_unstemmed Bonfils intubation fibrescope: use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscope
title_short Bonfils intubation fibrescope: use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscope
title_sort bonfils intubation fibrescope: use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to macintosh laryngoscope
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26920895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1937-2
work_keys_str_mv AT limbachtobias bonfilsintubationfibrescopeuseinsimulationbasedintubationtrainingformedicalstudentsincomparisontomacintoshlaryngoscope
AT ottthomas bonfilsintubationfibrescopeuseinsimulationbasedintubationtrainingformedicalstudentsincomparisontomacintoshlaryngoscope
AT griesingerjan bonfilsintubationfibrescopeuseinsimulationbasedintubationtrainingformedicalstudentsincomparisontomacintoshlaryngoscope
AT jahneimermacherantje bonfilsintubationfibrescopeuseinsimulationbasedintubationtrainingformedicalstudentsincomparisontomacintoshlaryngoscope
AT piephotim bonfilsintubationfibrescopeuseinsimulationbasedintubationtrainingformedicalstudentsincomparisontomacintoshlaryngoscope