Cargando…
Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration
BACKGROUND: Silk cocoon is composed of multiple layers. The natural silk cocoon containing all layers was cut as a rectangular shape as defined as total group. The inner and outermost layers were removed from the total group and the remained mat was defined as the middle group. The objectives of thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4770059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0057-1 |
_version_ | 1782418189089505280 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Seong-Gon Kim, Min-Keun Kweon, HaeYong Jo, You-Young Lee, Kwang-Gill Lee, Jeong Keun |
author_facet | Kim, Seong-Gon Kim, Min-Keun Kweon, HaeYong Jo, You-Young Lee, Kwang-Gill Lee, Jeong Keun |
author_sort | Kim, Seong-Gon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Silk cocoon is composed of multiple layers. The natural silk cocoon containing all layers was cut as a rectangular shape as defined as total group. The inner and outermost layers were removed from the total group and the remained mat was defined as the middle group. The objectives of this study was to compare the total group with the middle group as a barrier membrane for the guided bone regeneration. METHODS: The effects of these materials on the cellular proliferation and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression of MG63 cells were explored. For comparing bone regeneration ability, bilateral bone defects were created in calvarial areas in ten adult New Zealand white rabbits. The defects were covered with silk membranes of the middle group, with silk membrane of the total group used as the control on the contralateral side. The defects were allowed to heal for 4 and 8 weeks. Micro-computerized tomography (μCT) and histological examination were performed. RESULTS: The middle group exhibited a higher MTT value 48 and 72 h after treatment compared to the total group. ALP expression was also higher in the middle group. The results of μCT and histologic examination showed that new bone formation was significantly higher in the middle group compared to the total group 8 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the middle layer of the silk cocoon supports guided bone regeneration better than unprocessed silk cocoon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4770059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47700592016-04-09 Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration Kim, Seong-Gon Kim, Min-Keun Kweon, HaeYong Jo, You-Young Lee, Kwang-Gill Lee, Jeong Keun Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research BACKGROUND: Silk cocoon is composed of multiple layers. The natural silk cocoon containing all layers was cut as a rectangular shape as defined as total group. The inner and outermost layers were removed from the total group and the remained mat was defined as the middle group. The objectives of this study was to compare the total group with the middle group as a barrier membrane for the guided bone regeneration. METHODS: The effects of these materials on the cellular proliferation and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression of MG63 cells were explored. For comparing bone regeneration ability, bilateral bone defects were created in calvarial areas in ten adult New Zealand white rabbits. The defects were covered with silk membranes of the middle group, with silk membrane of the total group used as the control on the contralateral side. The defects were allowed to heal for 4 and 8 weeks. Micro-computerized tomography (μCT) and histological examination were performed. RESULTS: The middle group exhibited a higher MTT value 48 and 72 h after treatment compared to the total group. ALP expression was also higher in the middle group. The results of μCT and histologic examination showed that new bone formation was significantly higher in the middle group compared to the total group 8 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the middle layer of the silk cocoon supports guided bone regeneration better than unprocessed silk cocoon. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4770059/ /pubmed/27069911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0057-1 Text en © Kim et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Kim, Seong-Gon Kim, Min-Keun Kweon, HaeYong Jo, You-Young Lee, Kwang-Gill Lee, Jeong Keun Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration |
title | Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration |
title_full | Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration |
title_fullStr | Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration |
title_short | Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration |
title_sort | comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4770059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0057-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimseonggon comparisonofunprocessedsilkcocoonandsilkcocoonmiddlelayermembranesforguidedboneregeneration AT kimminkeun comparisonofunprocessedsilkcocoonandsilkcocoonmiddlelayermembranesforguidedboneregeneration AT kweonhaeyong comparisonofunprocessedsilkcocoonandsilkcocoonmiddlelayermembranesforguidedboneregeneration AT joyouyoung comparisonofunprocessedsilkcocoonandsilkcocoonmiddlelayermembranesforguidedboneregeneration AT leekwanggill comparisonofunprocessedsilkcocoonandsilkcocoonmiddlelayermembranesforguidedboneregeneration AT leejeongkeun comparisonofunprocessedsilkcocoonandsilkcocoonmiddlelayermembranesforguidedboneregeneration |