Cargando…

High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals

Despite its widespread clinical use, the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) remains poorly documented in elderly individuals. In this randomized, double-blind crossover study, we compared the efficacy of high-frequency (HF), low-frequency (LF), and placebo (P) TENS in a g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergeron-Vézina, Kayla, Corriveau, Hélène, Martel, Marylie, Harvey, Marie-Philippe, Léonard, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4770382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26101836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000276
_version_ 1782418253993213952
author Bergeron-Vézina, Kayla
Corriveau, Hélène
Martel, Marylie
Harvey, Marie-Philippe
Léonard, Guillaume
author_facet Bergeron-Vézina, Kayla
Corriveau, Hélène
Martel, Marylie
Harvey, Marie-Philippe
Léonard, Guillaume
author_sort Bergeron-Vézina, Kayla
collection PubMed
description Despite its widespread clinical use, the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) remains poorly documented in elderly individuals. In this randomized, double-blind crossover study, we compared the efficacy of high-frequency (HF), low-frequency (LF), and placebo (P) TENS in a group of 15 elderly adults (mean age: 67 ± 5 years). The effect of HF-, LF-, and P-TENS was also evaluated in a group of 15 young individuals (26 ± 5 years; same study design) to validate the effectiveness of the TENS protocols that were used in the elderly group. Each participant came to the laboratory on 3 separate occasions to receive, in random order, HF-, LF-, and P-TENS. Pain intensity and pain perception thresholds were assessed before, during, and after TENS, using an experimental heat pain paradigm. For the young group, there was a significant decrease in pain intensity during and after HF- and LF-TENS when compared with baseline, with both HF- and LF-TENS being superior to P-TENS. In the older group, HF- and LF-TENS did not reduce pain when compared with baseline and no difference was observed between the 2 active TENS sessions and P-TENS. High-frequency, LF-, and P-TENS all increased pain thresholds in young individuals, whereas in older individuals, only LF-TENS increased pain thresholds. Taken together, these results suggest that TENS is effective in young, but not in older, individuals. Future studies should be conducted to confirm these results in pain populations and to identify strategies that could enhance the effect of TENS in the elderly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4770382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47703822016-03-19 High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals Bergeron-Vézina, Kayla Corriveau, Hélène Martel, Marylie Harvey, Marie-Philippe Léonard, Guillaume Pain Research Paper Despite its widespread clinical use, the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) remains poorly documented in elderly individuals. In this randomized, double-blind crossover study, we compared the efficacy of high-frequency (HF), low-frequency (LF), and placebo (P) TENS in a group of 15 elderly adults (mean age: 67 ± 5 years). The effect of HF-, LF-, and P-TENS was also evaluated in a group of 15 young individuals (26 ± 5 years; same study design) to validate the effectiveness of the TENS protocols that were used in the elderly group. Each participant came to the laboratory on 3 separate occasions to receive, in random order, HF-, LF-, and P-TENS. Pain intensity and pain perception thresholds were assessed before, during, and after TENS, using an experimental heat pain paradigm. For the young group, there was a significant decrease in pain intensity during and after HF- and LF-TENS when compared with baseline, with both HF- and LF-TENS being superior to P-TENS. In the older group, HF- and LF-TENS did not reduce pain when compared with baseline and no difference was observed between the 2 active TENS sessions and P-TENS. High-frequency, LF-, and P-TENS all increased pain thresholds in young individuals, whereas in older individuals, only LF-TENS increased pain thresholds. Taken together, these results suggest that TENS is effective in young, but not in older, individuals. Future studies should be conducted to confirm these results in pain populations and to identify strategies that could enhance the effect of TENS in the elderly. Wolters Kluwer 2015-06-22 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4770382/ /pubmed/26101836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000276 Text en © 2015 International Association for the Study of Pain
spellingShingle Research Paper
Bergeron-Vézina, Kayla
Corriveau, Hélène
Martel, Marylie
Harvey, Marie-Philippe
Léonard, Guillaume
High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals
title High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals
title_full High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals
title_fullStr High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals
title_full_unstemmed High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals
title_short High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals
title_sort high- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4770382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26101836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000276
work_keys_str_mv AT bergeronvezinakayla highandlowfrequencytranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationdoesnotreduceexperimentalpaininelderlyindividuals
AT corriveauhelene highandlowfrequencytranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationdoesnotreduceexperimentalpaininelderlyindividuals
AT martelmarylie highandlowfrequencytranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationdoesnotreduceexperimentalpaininelderlyindividuals
AT harveymariephilippe highandlowfrequencytranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationdoesnotreduceexperimentalpaininelderlyindividuals
AT leonardguillaume highandlowfrequencytranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationdoesnotreduceexperimentalpaininelderlyindividuals