Cargando…

Detection of secondary ossification centers by sonography

BACKGROUND: To assess the validity of ultrasonography (US) in detection of secondary ossification centers (SOC) of the hand. Radiography is the standard technique for estimating skeletal bone age with its unwanted harmful effects mostly undesirable in little children. If efficient enough, US could b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karami, Mehdi, Moradi, Maryam, Khazaei, Mehdi, Modaresi, Mohamad-Reza, Asadi, Kambiz, Soleimani, Marzie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4770596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962514
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.175245
_version_ 1782418291811155968
author Karami, Mehdi
Moradi, Maryam
Khazaei, Mehdi
Modaresi, Mohamad-Reza
Asadi, Kambiz
Soleimani, Marzie
author_facet Karami, Mehdi
Moradi, Maryam
Khazaei, Mehdi
Modaresi, Mohamad-Reza
Asadi, Kambiz
Soleimani, Marzie
author_sort Karami, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the validity of ultrasonography (US) in detection of secondary ossification centers (SOC) of the hand. Radiography is the standard technique for estimating skeletal bone age with its unwanted harmful effects mostly undesirable in little children. If efficient enough, US could be an appropriate substitute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Left hand US was performed on 6-60 months children (n = 24, with 29 SOCs for each child in his/her hand and a total of 696 SOCs) referred for wrist radiography and bone age determination during a 4 months period. The presence of SOCs was investigated by US and radiography by two radiologists under blind conditions. RESULTS: US was evaluated 696 SOCs, and 446 SOCs were detected, by US and 436 by radiography without statistically significant difference. The results of US and radiography in detection of SOCs of distal forearm (23 SOCs were detected by both US and radiography) and carpi (87 SOCs) were identical. However, in metacarpi (94 for US, 88 for radiography) and phalanges (242 for US, 238 for radiography) US appeared better. CONCLUSION: On the base of our data, US is at least as effective as radiography in detection of SOCs and therefore can play a role in the skeletal age estimation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4770596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47705962016-03-09 Detection of secondary ossification centers by sonography Karami, Mehdi Moradi, Maryam Khazaei, Mehdi Modaresi, Mohamad-Reza Asadi, Kambiz Soleimani, Marzie Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To assess the validity of ultrasonography (US) in detection of secondary ossification centers (SOC) of the hand. Radiography is the standard technique for estimating skeletal bone age with its unwanted harmful effects mostly undesirable in little children. If efficient enough, US could be an appropriate substitute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Left hand US was performed on 6-60 months children (n = 24, with 29 SOCs for each child in his/her hand and a total of 696 SOCs) referred for wrist radiography and bone age determination during a 4 months period. The presence of SOCs was investigated by US and radiography by two radiologists under blind conditions. RESULTS: US was evaluated 696 SOCs, and 446 SOCs were detected, by US and 436 by radiography without statistically significant difference. The results of US and radiography in detection of SOCs of distal forearm (23 SOCs were detected by both US and radiography) and carpi (87 SOCs) were identical. However, in metacarpi (94 for US, 88 for radiography) and phalanges (242 for US, 238 for radiography) US appeared better. CONCLUSION: On the base of our data, US is at least as effective as radiography in detection of SOCs and therefore can play a role in the skeletal age estimation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4770596/ /pubmed/26962514 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.175245 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Karami. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karami, Mehdi
Moradi, Maryam
Khazaei, Mehdi
Modaresi, Mohamad-Reza
Asadi, Kambiz
Soleimani, Marzie
Detection of secondary ossification centers by sonography
title Detection of secondary ossification centers by sonography
title_full Detection of secondary ossification centers by sonography
title_fullStr Detection of secondary ossification centers by sonography
title_full_unstemmed Detection of secondary ossification centers by sonography
title_short Detection of secondary ossification centers by sonography
title_sort detection of secondary ossification centers by sonography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4770596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962514
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.175245
work_keys_str_mv AT karamimehdi detectionofsecondaryossificationcentersbysonography
AT moradimaryam detectionofsecondaryossificationcentersbysonography
AT khazaeimehdi detectionofsecondaryossificationcentersbysonography
AT modaresimohamadreza detectionofsecondaryossificationcentersbysonography
AT asadikambiz detectionofsecondaryossificationcentersbysonography
AT soleimanimarzie detectionofsecondaryossificationcentersbysonography