Cargando…

Adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas are characterized by distinct epigenomic as well as mutational and transcriptomic profiles

INTRODUCTION: Craniopharyngiomas (CP) are rare epithelial tumors of the sellar region. Two subtypes, adamantinomatous (adaCP) and papillary CP (papCP), were previously identified based on histomorphological and epidemiological aspects. Recent data indicates that both variants are defined by specific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hölsken, Annett, Sill, Martin, Merkle, Jessica, Schweizer, Leonille, Buchfelder, Michael, Flitsch, Jörg, Fahlbusch, Rudolf, Metzler, Markus, Kool, Marcel, Pfister, Stefan M., von Deimling, Andreas, Capper, David, Jones, David T. W., Buslei, Rolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4770705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26927026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0287-6
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Craniopharyngiomas (CP) are rare epithelial tumors of the sellar region. Two subtypes, adamantinomatous (adaCP) and papillary CP (papCP), were previously identified based on histomorphological and epidemiological aspects. Recent data indicates that both variants are defined by specific genetic alterations, and influenced by distinct molecular pathways and particular origins. The fact that CP is an uncommon tumor entity renders studies on large cohorts difficult and exceptional. In order to achieve further insights distinguishing CP variants, we conducted whole genome methylation (450 k array) and microarray-based gene expression studies in addition to CTNNB1 and BRAF mutation analysis using a comprehensive cohort of 80 adaCP and 35 papCP. RESULTS: BRAFV600E mutations were solely found in the papCP subgroup and were not detectable in adaCP samples. In contrast, CTNNB1 mutations were exclusively detected in adaCP. The methylome fingerprints assigned DNA specimens to entity-specific groups (papCP (n = 18); adaCP (n = 25)) matching perfectly with histology-based diagnosis, suggesting that they represent truly distinct biological entities. However, we were not able to detect within the adaCP group (including 11 pediatric and 14 adult cases) a significant difference in methylation signature by age. Integrative comparison of the papCP with the adaCP group based on differential gene expression and methylation revealed a distinct upregulation of Wnt- and SHH signaling pathway genes in adaCP. CONCLUSIONS: AdaCP and papCP thus represent distinct tumor subtypes that harbor mutually exclusive gene mutations and methylation patterns, further reflected in differences in gene expression. This study demonstrates that DNA methylation analyses are an additional method to classify CP into subtypes, and implicates a role of epigenetic mechanisms in the genesis of the respective CP variants. Detection of tumor-specific signaling pathway activation enables the possibility of target-oriented intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40478-016-0287-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.