Cargando…
Analysis of matched case-control studies
There are two common misconceptions about case-control studies: that matching in itself eliminates (controls) confounding by the matching factors, and that if matching has been performed, then a “matched analysis” is required. However, matching in a case-control study does not control for confoundin...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4770817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26916049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i969 |
_version_ | 1782418335922651136 |
---|---|
author | Pearce, Neil |
author_facet | Pearce, Neil |
author_sort | Pearce, Neil |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are two common misconceptions about case-control studies: that matching in itself eliminates (controls) confounding by the matching factors, and that if matching has been performed, then a “matched analysis” is required. However, matching in a case-control study does not control for confounding by the matching factors; in fact it can introduce confounding by the matching factors even when it did not exist in the source population. Thus, a matched design may require controlling for the matching factors in the analysis. However, it is not the case that a matched design requires a matched analysis. Provided that there are no problems of sparse data, control for the matching factors can be obtained, with no loss of validity and a possible increase in precision, using a “standard” (unconditional) analysis, and a “matched” (conditional) analysis may not be required or appropriate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4770817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47708172016-03-10 Analysis of matched case-control studies Pearce, Neil BMJ Research Methods & Reporting There are two common misconceptions about case-control studies: that matching in itself eliminates (controls) confounding by the matching factors, and that if matching has been performed, then a “matched analysis” is required. However, matching in a case-control study does not control for confounding by the matching factors; in fact it can introduce confounding by the matching factors even when it did not exist in the source population. Thus, a matched design may require controlling for the matching factors in the analysis. However, it is not the case that a matched design requires a matched analysis. Provided that there are no problems of sparse data, control for the matching factors can be obtained, with no loss of validity and a possible increase in precision, using a “standard” (unconditional) analysis, and a “matched” (conditional) analysis may not be required or appropriate. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4770817/ /pubmed/26916049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i969 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Methods & Reporting Pearce, Neil Analysis of matched case-control studies |
title | Analysis of matched case-control studies |
title_full | Analysis of matched case-control studies |
title_fullStr | Analysis of matched case-control studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of matched case-control studies |
title_short | Analysis of matched case-control studies |
title_sort | analysis of matched case-control studies |
topic | Research Methods & Reporting |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4770817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26916049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pearceneil analysisofmatchedcasecontrolstudies |