Cargando…

Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants

In patients with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs), pairing matched interaural electrodes and stimulating them with the same frequency band is expected to facilitate binaural functions such as binaural fusion, localization, and spatial release from masking. Because clinical procedures typically do n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Hongmei, Dietz, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515617143
_version_ 1782418356181139456
author Hu, Hongmei
Dietz, Mathias
author_facet Hu, Hongmei
Dietz, Mathias
author_sort Hu, Hongmei
collection PubMed
description In patients with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs), pairing matched interaural electrodes and stimulating them with the same frequency band is expected to facilitate binaural functions such as binaural fusion, localization, and spatial release from masking. Because clinical procedures typically do not include patient-specific interaural electrode pairing, it remains the case that each electrode is allocated to a generic frequency range, based simply on the electrode number. Two psychoacoustic techniques for determining interaurally paired electrodes have been demonstrated in several studies: interaural pitch comparison and interaural time difference (ITD) sensitivity. However, these two methods are rarely, if ever, compared directly. A third, more objective method is to assess the amplitude of the binaural interaction component (BIC) derived from electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses for different electrode pairings; a method has been demonstrated to be a potential candidate for bilateral CI users. Here, we tested all three measures in the same eight CI users. We found good correspondence between the electrode pair producing the largest BIC and the electrode pair producing the maximum ITD sensitivity. The correspondence between the pairs producing the largest BIC and the pitch-matched electrode pairs was considerably weaker, supporting the previously proposed hypothesis that whilst place pitch might adapt over time to accommodate mismatched inputs, sensitivity to ITDs does not adapt to the same degree.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4771032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47710322016-05-26 Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants Hu, Hongmei Dietz, Mathias Trends Hear Special Issue In patients with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs), pairing matched interaural electrodes and stimulating them with the same frequency band is expected to facilitate binaural functions such as binaural fusion, localization, and spatial release from masking. Because clinical procedures typically do not include patient-specific interaural electrode pairing, it remains the case that each electrode is allocated to a generic frequency range, based simply on the electrode number. Two psychoacoustic techniques for determining interaurally paired electrodes have been demonstrated in several studies: interaural pitch comparison and interaural time difference (ITD) sensitivity. However, these two methods are rarely, if ever, compared directly. A third, more objective method is to assess the amplitude of the binaural interaction component (BIC) derived from electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses for different electrode pairings; a method has been demonstrated to be a potential candidate for bilateral CI users. Here, we tested all three measures in the same eight CI users. We found good correspondence between the electrode pair producing the largest BIC and the electrode pair producing the maximum ITD sensitivity. The correspondence between the pairs producing the largest BIC and the pitch-matched electrode pairs was considerably weaker, supporting the previously proposed hypothesis that whilst place pitch might adapt over time to accommodate mismatched inputs, sensitivity to ITDs does not adapt to the same degree. SAGE Publications 2015-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4771032/ /pubmed/26631108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515617143 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Issue
Hu, Hongmei
Dietz, Mathias
Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants
title Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants
title_full Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants
title_fullStr Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants
title_short Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants
title_sort comparison of interaural electrode pairing methods for bilateral cochlear implants
topic Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515617143
work_keys_str_mv AT huhongmei comparisonofinterauralelectrodepairingmethodsforbilateralcochlearimplants
AT dietzmathias comparisonofinterauralelectrodepairingmethodsforbilateralcochlearimplants