Cargando…

Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users

Several binaural audio signal enhancement algorithms were evaluated with respect to their potential to improve speech intelligibility in noise for users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). 50% speech reception thresholds (SRT(50)) were assessed using an adaptive procedure in three distinct, realis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumgärtel, Regina M., Hu, Hongmei, Krawczyk-Becker, Martin, Marquardt, Daniel, Herzke, Tobias, Coleman, Graham, Adiloğlu, Kamil, Bomke, Katrin, Plotz, Karsten, Gerkmann, Timo, Doclo, Simon, Kollmeier, Birger, Hohmann, Volker, Dietz, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26721921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515617917
_version_ 1782418356634124288
author Baumgärtel, Regina M.
Hu, Hongmei
Krawczyk-Becker, Martin
Marquardt, Daniel
Herzke, Tobias
Coleman, Graham
Adiloğlu, Kamil
Bomke, Katrin
Plotz, Karsten
Gerkmann, Timo
Doclo, Simon
Kollmeier, Birger
Hohmann, Volker
Dietz, Mathias
author_facet Baumgärtel, Regina M.
Hu, Hongmei
Krawczyk-Becker, Martin
Marquardt, Daniel
Herzke, Tobias
Coleman, Graham
Adiloğlu, Kamil
Bomke, Katrin
Plotz, Karsten
Gerkmann, Timo
Doclo, Simon
Kollmeier, Birger
Hohmann, Volker
Dietz, Mathias
author_sort Baumgärtel, Regina M.
collection PubMed
description Several binaural audio signal enhancement algorithms were evaluated with respect to their potential to improve speech intelligibility in noise for users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). 50% speech reception thresholds (SRT(50)) were assessed using an adaptive procedure in three distinct, realistic noise scenarios. All scenarios were highly nonstationary, complex, and included a significant amount of reverberation. Other aspects, such as the perfectly frontal target position, were idealized laboratory settings, allowing the algorithms to perform better than in corresponding real-world conditions. Eight bilaterally implanted CI users, wearing devices from three manufacturers, participated in the study. In all noise conditions, a substantial improvement in SRT(50) compared to the unprocessed signal was observed for most of the algorithms tested, with the largest improvements generally provided by binaural minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamforming algorithms. The largest overall improvement in speech intelligibility was achieved by an adaptive binaural MVDR in a spatially separated, single competing talker noise scenario. A no-pre-processing condition and adaptive differential microphones without a binaural link served as the two baseline conditions. SRT(50) improvements provided by the binaural MVDR beamformers surpassed the performance of the adaptive differential microphones in most cases. Speech intelligibility improvements predicted by instrumental measures were shown to account for some but not all aspects of the perceptually obtained SRT(50) improvements measured in bilaterally implanted CI users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4771034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47710342016-05-26 Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users Baumgärtel, Regina M. Hu, Hongmei Krawczyk-Becker, Martin Marquardt, Daniel Herzke, Tobias Coleman, Graham Adiloğlu, Kamil Bomke, Katrin Plotz, Karsten Gerkmann, Timo Doclo, Simon Kollmeier, Birger Hohmann, Volker Dietz, Mathias Trends Hear Special Issue Several binaural audio signal enhancement algorithms were evaluated with respect to their potential to improve speech intelligibility in noise for users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). 50% speech reception thresholds (SRT(50)) were assessed using an adaptive procedure in three distinct, realistic noise scenarios. All scenarios were highly nonstationary, complex, and included a significant amount of reverberation. Other aspects, such as the perfectly frontal target position, were idealized laboratory settings, allowing the algorithms to perform better than in corresponding real-world conditions. Eight bilaterally implanted CI users, wearing devices from three manufacturers, participated in the study. In all noise conditions, a substantial improvement in SRT(50) compared to the unprocessed signal was observed for most of the algorithms tested, with the largest improvements generally provided by binaural minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamforming algorithms. The largest overall improvement in speech intelligibility was achieved by an adaptive binaural MVDR in a spatially separated, single competing talker noise scenario. A no-pre-processing condition and adaptive differential microphones without a binaural link served as the two baseline conditions. SRT(50) improvements provided by the binaural MVDR beamformers surpassed the performance of the adaptive differential microphones in most cases. Speech intelligibility improvements predicted by instrumental measures were shown to account for some but not all aspects of the perceptually obtained SRT(50) improvements measured in bilaterally implanted CI users. SAGE Publications 2015-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4771034/ /pubmed/26721921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515617917 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Issue
Baumgärtel, Regina M.
Hu, Hongmei
Krawczyk-Becker, Martin
Marquardt, Daniel
Herzke, Tobias
Coleman, Graham
Adiloğlu, Kamil
Bomke, Katrin
Plotz, Karsten
Gerkmann, Timo
Doclo, Simon
Kollmeier, Birger
Hohmann, Volker
Dietz, Mathias
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_full Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_short Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort comparing binaural pre-processing strategies ii: speech intelligibility of bilateral cochlear implant users
topic Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26721921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515617917
work_keys_str_mv AT baumgartelreginam comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT huhongmei comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT krawczykbeckermartin comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT marquardtdaniel comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT herzketobias comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT colemangraham comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT adiloglukamil comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT bomkekatrin comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT plotzkarsten comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT gerkmanntimo comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT doclosimon comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT kollmeierbirger comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT hohmannvolker comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers
AT dietzmathias comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers