Cargando…
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
Several binaural audio signal enhancement algorithms were evaluated with respect to their potential to improve speech intelligibility in noise for users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). 50% speech reception thresholds (SRT(50)) were assessed using an adaptive procedure in three distinct, realis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26721921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515617917 |
_version_ | 1782418356634124288 |
---|---|
author | Baumgärtel, Regina M. Hu, Hongmei Krawczyk-Becker, Martin Marquardt, Daniel Herzke, Tobias Coleman, Graham Adiloğlu, Kamil Bomke, Katrin Plotz, Karsten Gerkmann, Timo Doclo, Simon Kollmeier, Birger Hohmann, Volker Dietz, Mathias |
author_facet | Baumgärtel, Regina M. Hu, Hongmei Krawczyk-Becker, Martin Marquardt, Daniel Herzke, Tobias Coleman, Graham Adiloğlu, Kamil Bomke, Katrin Plotz, Karsten Gerkmann, Timo Doclo, Simon Kollmeier, Birger Hohmann, Volker Dietz, Mathias |
author_sort | Baumgärtel, Regina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several binaural audio signal enhancement algorithms were evaluated with respect to their potential to improve speech intelligibility in noise for users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). 50% speech reception thresholds (SRT(50)) were assessed using an adaptive procedure in three distinct, realistic noise scenarios. All scenarios were highly nonstationary, complex, and included a significant amount of reverberation. Other aspects, such as the perfectly frontal target position, were idealized laboratory settings, allowing the algorithms to perform better than in corresponding real-world conditions. Eight bilaterally implanted CI users, wearing devices from three manufacturers, participated in the study. In all noise conditions, a substantial improvement in SRT(50) compared to the unprocessed signal was observed for most of the algorithms tested, with the largest improvements generally provided by binaural minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamforming algorithms. The largest overall improvement in speech intelligibility was achieved by an adaptive binaural MVDR in a spatially separated, single competing talker noise scenario. A no-pre-processing condition and adaptive differential microphones without a binaural link served as the two baseline conditions. SRT(50) improvements provided by the binaural MVDR beamformers surpassed the performance of the adaptive differential microphones in most cases. Speech intelligibility improvements predicted by instrumental measures were shown to account for some but not all aspects of the perceptually obtained SRT(50) improvements measured in bilaterally implanted CI users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4771034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47710342016-05-26 Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users Baumgärtel, Regina M. Hu, Hongmei Krawczyk-Becker, Martin Marquardt, Daniel Herzke, Tobias Coleman, Graham Adiloğlu, Kamil Bomke, Katrin Plotz, Karsten Gerkmann, Timo Doclo, Simon Kollmeier, Birger Hohmann, Volker Dietz, Mathias Trends Hear Special Issue Several binaural audio signal enhancement algorithms were evaluated with respect to their potential to improve speech intelligibility in noise for users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). 50% speech reception thresholds (SRT(50)) were assessed using an adaptive procedure in three distinct, realistic noise scenarios. All scenarios were highly nonstationary, complex, and included a significant amount of reverberation. Other aspects, such as the perfectly frontal target position, were idealized laboratory settings, allowing the algorithms to perform better than in corresponding real-world conditions. Eight bilaterally implanted CI users, wearing devices from three manufacturers, participated in the study. In all noise conditions, a substantial improvement in SRT(50) compared to the unprocessed signal was observed for most of the algorithms tested, with the largest improvements generally provided by binaural minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamforming algorithms. The largest overall improvement in speech intelligibility was achieved by an adaptive binaural MVDR in a spatially separated, single competing talker noise scenario. A no-pre-processing condition and adaptive differential microphones without a binaural link served as the two baseline conditions. SRT(50) improvements provided by the binaural MVDR beamformers surpassed the performance of the adaptive differential microphones in most cases. Speech intelligibility improvements predicted by instrumental measures were shown to account for some but not all aspects of the perceptually obtained SRT(50) improvements measured in bilaterally implanted CI users. SAGE Publications 2015-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4771034/ /pubmed/26721921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515617917 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Special Issue Baumgärtel, Regina M. Hu, Hongmei Krawczyk-Becker, Martin Marquardt, Daniel Herzke, Tobias Coleman, Graham Adiloğlu, Kamil Bomke, Katrin Plotz, Karsten Gerkmann, Timo Doclo, Simon Kollmeier, Birger Hohmann, Volker Dietz, Mathias Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users |
title | Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users |
title_full | Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users |
title_fullStr | Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users |
title_short | Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users |
title_sort | comparing binaural pre-processing strategies ii: speech intelligibility of bilateral cochlear implant users |
topic | Special Issue |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26721921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515617917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baumgartelreginam comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT huhongmei comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT krawczykbeckermartin comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT marquardtdaniel comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT herzketobias comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT colemangraham comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT adiloglukamil comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT bomkekatrin comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT plotzkarsten comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT gerkmanntimo comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT doclosimon comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT kollmeierbirger comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT hohmannvolker comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers AT dietzmathias comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiispeechintelligibilityofbilateralcochlearimplantusers |