Cargando…

Analysis of TcdB Proteins within the Hypervirulent Clade 2 Reveals an Impact of RhoA Glucosylation on Clostridium difficile Proinflammatory Activities

Clostridium difficile strains within the hypervirulent clade 2 are responsible for nosocomial outbreaks worldwide. The increased pathogenic potential of these strains has been attributed to several factors but is still poorly understood. During a C. difficile outbreak, a strain from this clade was f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quesada-Gómez, Carlos, López-Ureña, Diana, Chumbler, Nicole, Kroh, Heather K., Castro-Peña, Carolina, Rodríguez, César, Orozco-Aguilar, Josué, González-Camacho, Sara, Rucavado, Alexandra, Guzmán-Verri, Caterina, Lawley, Trevor D., Lacy, D. Borden, Chaves-Olarte, Esteban
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26755157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01291-15
Descripción
Sumario:Clostridium difficile strains within the hypervirulent clade 2 are responsible for nosocomial outbreaks worldwide. The increased pathogenic potential of these strains has been attributed to several factors but is still poorly understood. During a C. difficile outbreak, a strain from this clade was found to induce a variant cytopathic effect (CPE), different from the canonical arborizing CPE. This strain (NAP1(V)) belongs to the NAP1 genotype but to a ribotype different from the epidemic NAP1/RT027 strain. NAP1(V) and NAP1 share some properties, including the overproduction of toxins, the binary toxin, and mutations in tcdC. NAP1(V) is not resistant to fluoroquinolones, however. A comparative analysis of TcdB proteins from NAP1/RT027 and NAP1(V) strains indicated that both target Rac, Cdc42, Rap, and R-Ras but only the former glucosylates RhoA. Thus, TcdB from hypervirulent clade 2 strains possesses an extended substrate profile, and RhoA is crucial for the type of CPE induced. Sequence comparison and structural modeling revealed that TcdB(NAP1) and TcdB(NAP1V) share the receptor-binding and autoprocessing activities but vary in the glucosyltransferase domain, consistent with the different substrate profile. Whereas the two toxins displayed identical cytotoxic potencies, TcdB(NAP1) induced a stronger proinflammatory response than TcdB(NAP1V) as determined in ex vivo experiments and animal models. Since immune activation at the level of intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of C. difficile-induced infections, we propose that the panel of substrates targeted by TcdB is a determining factor in the pathogenesis of this pathogen and in the differential virulence potential seen among C. difficile strains.