Cargando…

Membrane-Stabilizing Agents Improve Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Lumbar Stenosis

Study Design Retrospective cohort controlled study. Objective To determine quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with membrane-stabilizing agents (MSAs). Methods Patients with LSS and concordant neurogenic claudication treated with MSAs (n = 701) or co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bansal, Sachin, Lubelski, Daniel, Thompson, Nicolas R., Shah, Ali A., Mazanec, Daniel J., Benzel, Edward C., Khalaf, Tagreed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26933615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557144
_version_ 1782418396382494720
author Bansal, Sachin
Lubelski, Daniel
Thompson, Nicolas R.
Shah, Ali A.
Mazanec, Daniel J.
Benzel, Edward C.
Khalaf, Tagreed
author_facet Bansal, Sachin
Lubelski, Daniel
Thompson, Nicolas R.
Shah, Ali A.
Mazanec, Daniel J.
Benzel, Edward C.
Khalaf, Tagreed
author_sort Bansal, Sachin
collection PubMed
description Study Design Retrospective cohort controlled study. Objective To determine quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with membrane-stabilizing agents (MSAs). Methods Patients with LSS and concordant neurogenic claudication treated with MSAs (n = 701) or conservatively without MSAs (n = 2104) at a single tertiary care hospital were identified. Patient QOL measures (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ9], EuroQOL-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D], Pain Disability Questionnaire [PDQ]) were recorded pretreatment and then 4 months following treatment. Propensity score matching was used to account for baseline demographic differences between the two groups. The primary outcome measure was posttreatment improvement in these QOL measures. Results Patients in both groups had statistically significant improvements in the EQ-5D. However, the EQ-5D improvement in the MSA group was significantly greater than the improvement in the control group (0.11 versus 0.06; p = 0.0494). The EQ-5D change in the MSA group also exceeded the minimum clinically important difference, thereby suggesting a clinical significance. Both groups had significant pre- to posttreatment improvements in PDQ and PHQ-9, but these changes were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that patients with LSS and neurogenic claudication can have greater QOL improvements when treated with MSAs compared with other forms of conservative management without MSAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4771494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47714942016-03-01 Membrane-Stabilizing Agents Improve Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Lumbar Stenosis Bansal, Sachin Lubelski, Daniel Thompson, Nicolas R. Shah, Ali A. Mazanec, Daniel J. Benzel, Edward C. Khalaf, Tagreed Global Spine J Article Study Design Retrospective cohort controlled study. Objective To determine quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with membrane-stabilizing agents (MSAs). Methods Patients with LSS and concordant neurogenic claudication treated with MSAs (n = 701) or conservatively without MSAs (n = 2104) at a single tertiary care hospital were identified. Patient QOL measures (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ9], EuroQOL-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D], Pain Disability Questionnaire [PDQ]) were recorded pretreatment and then 4 months following treatment. Propensity score matching was used to account for baseline demographic differences between the two groups. The primary outcome measure was posttreatment improvement in these QOL measures. Results Patients in both groups had statistically significant improvements in the EQ-5D. However, the EQ-5D improvement in the MSA group was significantly greater than the improvement in the control group (0.11 versus 0.06; p = 0.0494). The EQ-5D change in the MSA group also exceeded the minimum clinically important difference, thereby suggesting a clinical significance. Both groups had significant pre- to posttreatment improvements in PDQ and PHQ-9, but these changes were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that patients with LSS and neurogenic claudication can have greater QOL improvements when treated with MSAs compared with other forms of conservative management without MSAs. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-07-14 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4771494/ /pubmed/26933615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557144 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Bansal, Sachin
Lubelski, Daniel
Thompson, Nicolas R.
Shah, Ali A.
Mazanec, Daniel J.
Benzel, Edward C.
Khalaf, Tagreed
Membrane-Stabilizing Agents Improve Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Lumbar Stenosis
title Membrane-Stabilizing Agents Improve Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Lumbar Stenosis
title_full Membrane-Stabilizing Agents Improve Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Lumbar Stenosis
title_fullStr Membrane-Stabilizing Agents Improve Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Lumbar Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Membrane-Stabilizing Agents Improve Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Lumbar Stenosis
title_short Membrane-Stabilizing Agents Improve Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Lumbar Stenosis
title_sort membrane-stabilizing agents improve quality-of-life outcomes for patients with lumbar stenosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26933615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557144
work_keys_str_mv AT bansalsachin membranestabilizingagentsimprovequalityoflifeoutcomesforpatientswithlumbarstenosis
AT lubelskidaniel membranestabilizingagentsimprovequalityoflifeoutcomesforpatientswithlumbarstenosis
AT thompsonnicolasr membranestabilizingagentsimprovequalityoflifeoutcomesforpatientswithlumbarstenosis
AT shahalia membranestabilizingagentsimprovequalityoflifeoutcomesforpatientswithlumbarstenosis
AT mazanecdanielj membranestabilizingagentsimprovequalityoflifeoutcomesforpatientswithlumbarstenosis
AT benzeledwardc membranestabilizingagentsimprovequalityoflifeoutcomesforpatientswithlumbarstenosis
AT khalaftagreed membranestabilizingagentsimprovequalityoflifeoutcomesforpatientswithlumbarstenosis