Cargando…

Comparisons of interdisciplinary ballast water treatment systems and operational experiences from ships

There are high functioning and low functioning ballast water treatment systems on board ships. In this study, five systems were analysed so as to methodically examine the operational difficulties for ship crew members while giving important consideration to sustainable environment practices. Multi-c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bakalar, Goran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1916-z
_version_ 1782418420812218368
author Bakalar, Goran
author_facet Bakalar, Goran
author_sort Bakalar, Goran
collection PubMed
description There are high functioning and low functioning ballast water treatment systems on board ships. In this study, five systems were analysed so as to methodically examine the operational difficulties for ship crew members while giving important consideration to sustainable environment practices. Multi-criteria analysis, a questionnaire, survey and interviews were used as the research method so as to ascertain and corroborate existing problems on board ships, and the reliability of the systems was calculated. The co-insistency, maintenance and the efficiency of the systems, were shown as being the major problem as there are no systems for tracking ship ballast operations from land. The treatment system that used oxidants was, through multi criteria analysis, evaluated as being the best and was ranked first. However, the survey results showed that the ship’s crew had serious problems with this system which difficult to solve during the ship’s operations with cargo. The deoxygenation system was the most appropriate according to ballast water treatment criteria in the port or at sea. The treatment system which used electrolysis with oxidant was better in terms of efficacy and the treatment system electrolysis with ultra violet light was better in terms of the criterion environment pollution footprint. During further research, it was shown that 7 % of the surveyed crew members had major problems with operating ballast water treatment systems, including the system which was ranked first through multi criteria analysis. They by-passed these systems while continuing to ballast or de-ballast. It was calculated that of the total time needed for the ballast water treatment system operation, 9 % of this time was used for repairs or maintenance of the systems. Some examples are changing a used UV bulb, cleaning the filter or controlling the amount of oxidant which would be discharged into the sea. A conclusion was made and solution was suggested. The study results emphasised taking action in the interest of protecting the natural world, with particular attention being given to environmental protection to support human life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4771674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47716742016-03-29 Comparisons of interdisciplinary ballast water treatment systems and operational experiences from ships Bakalar, Goran Springerplus Review There are high functioning and low functioning ballast water treatment systems on board ships. In this study, five systems were analysed so as to methodically examine the operational difficulties for ship crew members while giving important consideration to sustainable environment practices. Multi-criteria analysis, a questionnaire, survey and interviews were used as the research method so as to ascertain and corroborate existing problems on board ships, and the reliability of the systems was calculated. The co-insistency, maintenance and the efficiency of the systems, were shown as being the major problem as there are no systems for tracking ship ballast operations from land. The treatment system that used oxidants was, through multi criteria analysis, evaluated as being the best and was ranked first. However, the survey results showed that the ship’s crew had serious problems with this system which difficult to solve during the ship’s operations with cargo. The deoxygenation system was the most appropriate according to ballast water treatment criteria in the port or at sea. The treatment system which used electrolysis with oxidant was better in terms of efficacy and the treatment system electrolysis with ultra violet light was better in terms of the criterion environment pollution footprint. During further research, it was shown that 7 % of the surveyed crew members had major problems with operating ballast water treatment systems, including the system which was ranked first through multi criteria analysis. They by-passed these systems while continuing to ballast or de-ballast. It was calculated that of the total time needed for the ballast water treatment system operation, 9 % of this time was used for repairs or maintenance of the systems. Some examples are changing a used UV bulb, cleaning the filter or controlling the amount of oxidant which would be discharged into the sea. A conclusion was made and solution was suggested. The study results emphasised taking action in the interest of protecting the natural world, with particular attention being given to environmental protection to support human life. Springer International Publishing 2016-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4771674/ /pubmed/27026934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1916-z Text en © Bakalar. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Bakalar, Goran
Comparisons of interdisciplinary ballast water treatment systems and operational experiences from ships
title Comparisons of interdisciplinary ballast water treatment systems and operational experiences from ships
title_full Comparisons of interdisciplinary ballast water treatment systems and operational experiences from ships
title_fullStr Comparisons of interdisciplinary ballast water treatment systems and operational experiences from ships
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of interdisciplinary ballast water treatment systems and operational experiences from ships
title_short Comparisons of interdisciplinary ballast water treatment systems and operational experiences from ships
title_sort comparisons of interdisciplinary ballast water treatment systems and operational experiences from ships
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1916-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bakalargoran comparisonsofinterdisciplinaryballastwatertreatmentsystemsandoperationalexperiencesfromships