Cargando…
Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes
BACKGROUND: Sponges (Porifera) harbor distinct microbial consortia within their mesohyl interior. We herein analysed the hologenomes of Stylissa carteri and Xestospongia testudinaria, which notably differ in their microbiome content. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that S. carteri has an expanded rep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0 |
_version_ | 1782418544480223232 |
---|---|
author | Ryu, Taewoo Seridi, Loqmane Moitinho-Silva, Lucas Oates, Matthew Liew, Yi Jin Mavromatis, Charalampos Wang, Xiaolei Haywood, Annika Lafi, Feras F. Kupresanin, Marija Sougrat, Rachid Alzahrani, Majed A. Giles, Emily Ghosheh, Yanal Schunter, Celia Baumgarten, Sebastian Berumen, Michael L. Gao, Xin Aranda, Manuel Foret, Sylvain Gough, Julian Voolstra, Christian R. Hentschel, Ute Ravasi, Timothy |
author_facet | Ryu, Taewoo Seridi, Loqmane Moitinho-Silva, Lucas Oates, Matthew Liew, Yi Jin Mavromatis, Charalampos Wang, Xiaolei Haywood, Annika Lafi, Feras F. Kupresanin, Marija Sougrat, Rachid Alzahrani, Majed A. Giles, Emily Ghosheh, Yanal Schunter, Celia Baumgarten, Sebastian Berumen, Michael L. Gao, Xin Aranda, Manuel Foret, Sylvain Gough, Julian Voolstra, Christian R. Hentschel, Ute Ravasi, Timothy |
author_sort | Ryu, Taewoo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sponges (Porifera) harbor distinct microbial consortia within their mesohyl interior. We herein analysed the hologenomes of Stylissa carteri and Xestospongia testudinaria, which notably differ in their microbiome content. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that S. carteri has an expanded repertoire of immunological domains, specifically Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich (SRCR)-like domains, compared to X. testudinaria. On the microbial side, metatranscriptome analyses revealed an overrepresentation of potential symbiosis-related domains in X. testudinaria. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide genomic insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying host-symbiont coevolution and may serve as a roadmap for future hologenome analyses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4772301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47723012016-03-02 Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes Ryu, Taewoo Seridi, Loqmane Moitinho-Silva, Lucas Oates, Matthew Liew, Yi Jin Mavromatis, Charalampos Wang, Xiaolei Haywood, Annika Lafi, Feras F. Kupresanin, Marija Sougrat, Rachid Alzahrani, Majed A. Giles, Emily Ghosheh, Yanal Schunter, Celia Baumgarten, Sebastian Berumen, Michael L. Gao, Xin Aranda, Manuel Foret, Sylvain Gough, Julian Voolstra, Christian R. Hentschel, Ute Ravasi, Timothy BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Sponges (Porifera) harbor distinct microbial consortia within their mesohyl interior. We herein analysed the hologenomes of Stylissa carteri and Xestospongia testudinaria, which notably differ in their microbiome content. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that S. carteri has an expanded repertoire of immunological domains, specifically Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich (SRCR)-like domains, compared to X. testudinaria. On the microbial side, metatranscriptome analyses revealed an overrepresentation of potential symbiosis-related domains in X. testudinaria. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide genomic insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying host-symbiont coevolution and may serve as a roadmap for future hologenome analyses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4772301/ /pubmed/26926518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0 Text en © Ryu et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ryu, Taewoo Seridi, Loqmane Moitinho-Silva, Lucas Oates, Matthew Liew, Yi Jin Mavromatis, Charalampos Wang, Xiaolei Haywood, Annika Lafi, Feras F. Kupresanin, Marija Sougrat, Rachid Alzahrani, Majed A. Giles, Emily Ghosheh, Yanal Schunter, Celia Baumgarten, Sebastian Berumen, Michael L. Gao, Xin Aranda, Manuel Foret, Sylvain Gough, Julian Voolstra, Christian R. Hentschel, Ute Ravasi, Timothy Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes |
title | Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes |
title_full | Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes |
title_fullStr | Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes |
title_short | Hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes |
title_sort | hologenome analysis of two marine sponges with different microbiomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2501-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryutaewoo hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT seridiloqmane hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT moitinhosilvalucas hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT oatesmatthew hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT liewyijin hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT mavromatischaralampos hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT wangxiaolei hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT haywoodannika hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT lafiferasf hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT kupresaninmarija hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT sougratrachid hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT alzahranimajeda hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT gilesemily hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT ghoshehyanal hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT schuntercelia hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT baumgartensebastian hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT berumenmichaell hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT gaoxin hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT arandamanuel hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT foretsylvain hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT goughjulian hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT voolstrachristianr hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT hentschelute hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes AT ravasitimothy hologenomeanalysisoftwomarinespongeswithdifferentmicrobiomes |