Cargando…
Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Frailty is widely recognised as a distinct multifactorial clinical syndrome that implies vulnerability. The links between frailty and adverse outcomes such as death and institutionalisation have been widely evidenced. There is currently no gold standard frailty assessment tool; optimizin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26927924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0225-2 |
_version_ | 1782418552879316992 |
---|---|
author | Sutton, Jennifer L. Gould, Rebecca L. Daley, Stephanie Coulson, Mark C. Ward, Emma V. Butler, Aine M. Nunn, Stephen P. Howard, Robert J. |
author_facet | Sutton, Jennifer L. Gould, Rebecca L. Daley, Stephanie Coulson, Mark C. Ward, Emma V. Butler, Aine M. Nunn, Stephen P. Howard, Robert J. |
author_sort | Sutton, Jennifer L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Frailty is widely recognised as a distinct multifactorial clinical syndrome that implies vulnerability. The links between frailty and adverse outcomes such as death and institutionalisation have been widely evidenced. There is currently no gold standard frailty assessment tool; optimizing the assessment of frailty in older people therefore remains a research priority. The objective of this systematic review is to identify existing multi-component frailty assessment tools that were specifically developed to assess frailty in adults aged ≥60 years old and to systematically and critically evaluate the reliability and validity of these tools. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using the standardised COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist to assess the methodological quality of included studies. RESULTS: Five thousand sixty-three studies were identified in total: 73 of which were included for review. 38 multi-component frailty assessment tools were identified: Reliability and validity data were available for 21 % (8/38) of tools. Only 5 % (2/38) of the frailty assessment tools had evidence of reliability and validity that was within statistically significant parameters and of fair-excellent methodological quality (the Frailty Index-Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment [FI-CGA] and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator [TFI]). CONCLUSIONS: The TFI has the most robust evidence of reliability and validity and has been the most extensively examined in terms of psychometric properties. However, there is insufficient evidence at present to determine the best tool for use in research and clinical practice. Further in-depth evaluation of the psychometric properties of these tools is required before they can fulfil the criteria for a gold standard assessment tool. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0225-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4772336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47723362016-03-02 Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review Sutton, Jennifer L. Gould, Rebecca L. Daley, Stephanie Coulson, Mark C. Ward, Emma V. Butler, Aine M. Nunn, Stephen P. Howard, Robert J. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Frailty is widely recognised as a distinct multifactorial clinical syndrome that implies vulnerability. The links between frailty and adverse outcomes such as death and institutionalisation have been widely evidenced. There is currently no gold standard frailty assessment tool; optimizing the assessment of frailty in older people therefore remains a research priority. The objective of this systematic review is to identify existing multi-component frailty assessment tools that were specifically developed to assess frailty in adults aged ≥60 years old and to systematically and critically evaluate the reliability and validity of these tools. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using the standardised COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist to assess the methodological quality of included studies. RESULTS: Five thousand sixty-three studies were identified in total: 73 of which were included for review. 38 multi-component frailty assessment tools were identified: Reliability and validity data were available for 21 % (8/38) of tools. Only 5 % (2/38) of the frailty assessment tools had evidence of reliability and validity that was within statistically significant parameters and of fair-excellent methodological quality (the Frailty Index-Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment [FI-CGA] and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator [TFI]). CONCLUSIONS: The TFI has the most robust evidence of reliability and validity and has been the most extensively examined in terms of psychometric properties. However, there is insufficient evidence at present to determine the best tool for use in research and clinical practice. Further in-depth evaluation of the psychometric properties of these tools is required before they can fulfil the criteria for a gold standard assessment tool. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0225-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4772336/ /pubmed/26927924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0225-2 Text en © Sutton et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sutton, Jennifer L. Gould, Rebecca L. Daley, Stephanie Coulson, Mark C. Ward, Emma V. Butler, Aine M. Nunn, Stephen P. Howard, Robert J. Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review |
title | Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review |
title_full | Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review |
title_short | Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review |
title_sort | psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26927924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0225-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suttonjenniferl psychometricpropertiesofmulticomponenttoolsdesignedtoassessfrailtyinolderadultsasystematicreview AT gouldrebeccal psychometricpropertiesofmulticomponenttoolsdesignedtoassessfrailtyinolderadultsasystematicreview AT daleystephanie psychometricpropertiesofmulticomponenttoolsdesignedtoassessfrailtyinolderadultsasystematicreview AT coulsonmarkc psychometricpropertiesofmulticomponenttoolsdesignedtoassessfrailtyinolderadultsasystematicreview AT wardemmav psychometricpropertiesofmulticomponenttoolsdesignedtoassessfrailtyinolderadultsasystematicreview AT butlerainem psychometricpropertiesofmulticomponenttoolsdesignedtoassessfrailtyinolderadultsasystematicreview AT nunnstephenp psychometricpropertiesofmulticomponenttoolsdesignedtoassessfrailtyinolderadultsasystematicreview AT howardrobertj psychometricpropertiesofmulticomponenttoolsdesignedtoassessfrailtyinolderadultsasystematicreview |