Cargando…

Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair

PURPOSE: Arthroscopic transosseous (TO) rotator cuff repair has recently emerged as a new option for surgical treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Limited data is available regarding outcomes using this technique. This study evaluated midterm clinical outcomes following a novel arthroscopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flanagin, Brody A., Garofalo, Raffaele, Lo, Eddie Y., Feher, LeeAnne, Castagna, Alessandro, Qin, Huanying, Krishnan, Sumant G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26980983
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.174511
_version_ 1782418566010634240
author Flanagin, Brody A.
Garofalo, Raffaele
Lo, Eddie Y.
Feher, LeeAnne
Castagna, Alessandro
Qin, Huanying
Krishnan, Sumant G.
author_facet Flanagin, Brody A.
Garofalo, Raffaele
Lo, Eddie Y.
Feher, LeeAnne
Castagna, Alessandro
Qin, Huanying
Krishnan, Sumant G.
author_sort Flanagin, Brody A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Arthroscopic transosseous (TO) rotator cuff repair has recently emerged as a new option for surgical treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Limited data is available regarding outcomes using this technique. This study evaluated midterm clinical outcomes following a novel arthroscopic TO (anchorless) rotator cuff repair technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 107 patients and 109 shoulders underwent arthroscopic TO (anchorless) rotator cuff repair for a symptomatic full-thickness tear. Pre and postoperative range of motion (ROM) was compared at an average of 11.8 months. Postoperative outcome scores were obtained at an average of 38.0 months. Statistical analysis was performed to compare pre and postoperative ROM data. Univariate analysis was performed using Student's t-test to compare the effect of other clinical characteristics on final outcome. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements were noted in forward flexion, external rotation and internal rotation (P < 0.0001). Average postoperative subjective shoulder value was 93.7, simple shoulder test 11.6, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score 94.6. According to ASES scores, results for the 109 shoulders available for final follow-up were excellent in 95 (87.1%), good in 8 (7.3%), fair in 3 (2.8%), and poor in 3 (2.8%). There was no difference in ROM or outcome scores in patients who underwent a concomitant biceps procedure (tenodesis or tenotomy) compared with those who did not. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in outcome between patients who underwent either biceps tenodesis or tenotomy. Age, history of injury preceding the onset of pain, tear size, number of TO tunnels required to perform the repair, and presence of fatty infiltration did not correlate with postoperative ROM or subjective outcome measures at final follow-up. Two complications and four failures were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic TO rotator cuff repair technique leads to statistically significant midterm improvement in ROM and satisfactory midterm subjective outcome scores with low complication/failure rates in patients with average medium-sized rotator cuff tears with minimal fatty infiltration. Further work is required to evaluate radiographic healing rates with this technique and to compare outcomes following suture anchor repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4772414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47724142016-03-15 Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair Flanagin, Brody A. Garofalo, Raffaele Lo, Eddie Y. Feher, LeeAnne Castagna, Alessandro Qin, Huanying Krishnan, Sumant G. Int J Shoulder Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Arthroscopic transosseous (TO) rotator cuff repair has recently emerged as a new option for surgical treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Limited data is available regarding outcomes using this technique. This study evaluated midterm clinical outcomes following a novel arthroscopic TO (anchorless) rotator cuff repair technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 107 patients and 109 shoulders underwent arthroscopic TO (anchorless) rotator cuff repair for a symptomatic full-thickness tear. Pre and postoperative range of motion (ROM) was compared at an average of 11.8 months. Postoperative outcome scores were obtained at an average of 38.0 months. Statistical analysis was performed to compare pre and postoperative ROM data. Univariate analysis was performed using Student's t-test to compare the effect of other clinical characteristics on final outcome. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements were noted in forward flexion, external rotation and internal rotation (P < 0.0001). Average postoperative subjective shoulder value was 93.7, simple shoulder test 11.6, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score 94.6. According to ASES scores, results for the 109 shoulders available for final follow-up were excellent in 95 (87.1%), good in 8 (7.3%), fair in 3 (2.8%), and poor in 3 (2.8%). There was no difference in ROM or outcome scores in patients who underwent a concomitant biceps procedure (tenodesis or tenotomy) compared with those who did not. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in outcome between patients who underwent either biceps tenodesis or tenotomy. Age, history of injury preceding the onset of pain, tear size, number of TO tunnels required to perform the repair, and presence of fatty infiltration did not correlate with postoperative ROM or subjective outcome measures at final follow-up. Two complications and four failures were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic TO rotator cuff repair technique leads to statistically significant midterm improvement in ROM and satisfactory midterm subjective outcome scores with low complication/failure rates in patients with average medium-sized rotator cuff tears with minimal fatty infiltration. Further work is required to evaluate radiographic healing rates with this technique and to compare outcomes following suture anchor repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4772414/ /pubmed/26980983 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.174511 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Shoulder Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Flanagin, Brody A.
Garofalo, Raffaele
Lo, Eddie Y.
Feher, LeeAnne
Castagna, Alessandro
Qin, Huanying
Krishnan, Sumant G.
Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair
title Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair
title_full Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair
title_fullStr Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair
title_full_unstemmed Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair
title_short Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair
title_sort midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26980983
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.174511
work_keys_str_mv AT flanaginbrodya midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingarthroscopictransosseousrotatorcuffrepair
AT garofaloraffaele midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingarthroscopictransosseousrotatorcuffrepair
AT loeddiey midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingarthroscopictransosseousrotatorcuffrepair
AT feherleeanne midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingarthroscopictransosseousrotatorcuffrepair
AT castagnaalessandro midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingarthroscopictransosseousrotatorcuffrepair
AT qinhuanying midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingarthroscopictransosseousrotatorcuffrepair
AT krishnansumantg midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingarthroscopictransosseousrotatorcuffrepair