Cargando…

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA. And gemcitabine has been the standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, a combined use of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) has shown promising efficacies in pancreatic cancer pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouyang, Guoqing, Liu, Zhipeng, Huang, Shengfu, Li, Qianglong, Xiong, Li, Miao, Xiongying, Wen, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26927942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0813-9
_version_ 1782418571854348288
author Ouyang, Guoqing
Liu, Zhipeng
Huang, Shengfu
Li, Qianglong
Xiong, Li
Miao, Xiongying
Wen, Yu
author_facet Ouyang, Guoqing
Liu, Zhipeng
Huang, Shengfu
Li, Qianglong
Xiong, Li
Miao, Xiongying
Wen, Yu
author_sort Ouyang, Guoqing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA. And gemcitabine has been the standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, a combined use of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) has shown promising efficacies in pancreatic cancer patients. Here, system review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the efficacy and safety of GemCis versus gemcitabine (Gem) alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for retrieving the relevant publications prior to 31 September 2014. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and secondary end points included 6-month survival, 1 year survival, overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression/progression-free survival (TTP/PFS), and toxicities. RESULTS: A total of nine randomized controlled trials involving 1354 patients were included for systematic evaluations. Overall, as compared with Gem alone, GemCis significantly improved the 6-month survival rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.303, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.090–1.558, P = 0.004), ORR (RR = 1.482, 95 % CI 1.148–1.913, P = 0.003), PFS/TTP (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87; 95 % CI 0.78–0.93, P = 0.022), and the overall toxicities (RR = 2.164, 95 % CI 1.837–2.549, P = 0.000). However, no significance difference existed in overall survival (HR = 0.90, 95 % CI 0.80–1.42, P = 1.02), 1-year survival rate (RR = 0.956, 95 % CI 0.770–1.187, P = 0.684), and CBR (RR = 0.854, 95 % CI 0.681–1.072, P = 0.175). As for grade III/IV toxicity, seven kinds of toxicities were higher in the GemCis group. However, no significant inter-group statistical differences existed in the incidence of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher incidence of three-fourths toxicity, GemCis offers better outcomes of ORR, PFS/TTP, and 6-month survival, which indicates GemCis may be a promising therapy for pancreatic cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4772457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47724572016-03-02 Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis Ouyang, Guoqing Liu, Zhipeng Huang, Shengfu Li, Qianglong Xiong, Li Miao, Xiongying Wen, Yu World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA. And gemcitabine has been the standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, a combined use of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) has shown promising efficacies in pancreatic cancer patients. Here, system review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the efficacy and safety of GemCis versus gemcitabine (Gem) alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for retrieving the relevant publications prior to 31 September 2014. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and secondary end points included 6-month survival, 1 year survival, overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression/progression-free survival (TTP/PFS), and toxicities. RESULTS: A total of nine randomized controlled trials involving 1354 patients were included for systematic evaluations. Overall, as compared with Gem alone, GemCis significantly improved the 6-month survival rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.303, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.090–1.558, P = 0.004), ORR (RR = 1.482, 95 % CI 1.148–1.913, P = 0.003), PFS/TTP (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87; 95 % CI 0.78–0.93, P = 0.022), and the overall toxicities (RR = 2.164, 95 % CI 1.837–2.549, P = 0.000). However, no significance difference existed in overall survival (HR = 0.90, 95 % CI 0.80–1.42, P = 1.02), 1-year survival rate (RR = 0.956, 95 % CI 0.770–1.187, P = 0.684), and CBR (RR = 0.854, 95 % CI 0.681–1.072, P = 0.175). As for grade III/IV toxicity, seven kinds of toxicities were higher in the GemCis group. However, no significant inter-group statistical differences existed in the incidence of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher incidence of three-fourths toxicity, GemCis offers better outcomes of ORR, PFS/TTP, and 6-month survival, which indicates GemCis may be a promising therapy for pancreatic cancer. BioMed Central 2016-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4772457/ /pubmed/26927942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0813-9 Text en © Ouyang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ouyang, Guoqing
Liu, Zhipeng
Huang, Shengfu
Li, Qianglong
Xiong, Li
Miao, Xiongying
Wen, Yu
Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis
title Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26927942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0813-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ouyangguoqing gemcitabinepluscisplatinversusgemcitabinealoneinthetreatmentofpancreaticcancerametaanalysis
AT liuzhipeng gemcitabinepluscisplatinversusgemcitabinealoneinthetreatmentofpancreaticcancerametaanalysis
AT huangshengfu gemcitabinepluscisplatinversusgemcitabinealoneinthetreatmentofpancreaticcancerametaanalysis
AT liqianglong gemcitabinepluscisplatinversusgemcitabinealoneinthetreatmentofpancreaticcancerametaanalysis
AT xiongli gemcitabinepluscisplatinversusgemcitabinealoneinthetreatmentofpancreaticcancerametaanalysis
AT miaoxiongying gemcitabinepluscisplatinversusgemcitabinealoneinthetreatmentofpancreaticcancerametaanalysis
AT wenyu gemcitabinepluscisplatinversusgemcitabinealoneinthetreatmentofpancreaticcancerametaanalysis