Cargando…
Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks
BACKGROUND: Balancing the rights and obligations of custodians and applicants in relation to access to biobanks is of utmost importance to guarantee trust and confidence. This study aimed to reveal which issues divide different stakeholders in an attempt to determine the rights and/or obligations he...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0 |
_version_ | 1782418574192672768 |
---|---|
author | Verlinden, Michiel Nys, Herman Ectors, Nadine Huys, Isabelle |
author_facet | Verlinden, Michiel Nys, Herman Ectors, Nadine Huys, Isabelle |
author_sort | Verlinden, Michiel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Balancing the rights and obligations of custodians and applicants in relation to access to biobanks is of utmost importance to guarantee trust and confidence. This study aimed to reveal which issues divide different stakeholders in an attempt to determine the rights and/or obligations held on human biological materials (HBM) and data. METHODS: Twenty-eight informants in the Benelux and Scandinavia were interviewed in order to capture the perspectives of experts and stakeholders in relation to the rights and obligations held by custodians and applicants with respect to access to HBM and data. RESULTS: There was no consensus among the informants on whether the custodian of a biobank should decide upon the scientific merits and the utility of an access request. Nearly all informants agreed that a new request or an amendment to the initial request has to be submitted when an applicant wants to use leftover HBM in a new or follow-up project. Several informants felt that it might be justified to charge higher access fees to external or industrial applicants that did not contribute (directly or indirectly) to the collection of HBM and data. Most informants agreed that a custodian of a biobank could request the sharing and return of research results. It was furthermore argued that some of the benefits of research projects should be fed back into biobanks. CONCLUSIONS: The interviews revealed a rather complex web of rights and obligations allocated to the custodian and the applicant in relation to access to HBM and data stored in biobanks. Some rights and obligations are negotiated on a case-by-case basis, while others are stipulated in access arrangements. We did find a consensus on the attribution of certain general rights to the custodians and the applicant. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4772467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47724672016-03-02 Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks Verlinden, Michiel Nys, Herman Ectors, Nadine Huys, Isabelle BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Balancing the rights and obligations of custodians and applicants in relation to access to biobanks is of utmost importance to guarantee trust and confidence. This study aimed to reveal which issues divide different stakeholders in an attempt to determine the rights and/or obligations held on human biological materials (HBM) and data. METHODS: Twenty-eight informants in the Benelux and Scandinavia were interviewed in order to capture the perspectives of experts and stakeholders in relation to the rights and obligations held by custodians and applicants with respect to access to HBM and data. RESULTS: There was no consensus among the informants on whether the custodian of a biobank should decide upon the scientific merits and the utility of an access request. Nearly all informants agreed that a new request or an amendment to the initial request has to be submitted when an applicant wants to use leftover HBM in a new or follow-up project. Several informants felt that it might be justified to charge higher access fees to external or industrial applicants that did not contribute (directly or indirectly) to the collection of HBM and data. Most informants agreed that a custodian of a biobank could request the sharing and return of research results. It was furthermore argued that some of the benefits of research projects should be fed back into biobanks. CONCLUSIONS: The interviews revealed a rather complex web of rights and obligations allocated to the custodian and the applicant in relation to access to HBM and data stored in biobanks. Some rights and obligations are negotiated on a case-by-case basis, while others are stipulated in access arrangements. We did find a consensus on the attribution of certain general rights to the custodians and the applicant. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4772467/ /pubmed/26926004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0 Text en © Verlinden et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Verlinden, Michiel Nys, Herman Ectors, Nadine Huys, Isabelle Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks |
title | Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks |
title_full | Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks |
title_fullStr | Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks |
title_short | Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks |
title_sort | qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verlindenmichiel qualitativestudyoncustodianshipofhumanbiologicalmaterialanddatastoredinbiobanks AT nysherman qualitativestudyoncustodianshipofhumanbiologicalmaterialanddatastoredinbiobanks AT ectorsnadine qualitativestudyoncustodianshipofhumanbiologicalmaterialanddatastoredinbiobanks AT huysisabelle qualitativestudyoncustodianshipofhumanbiologicalmaterialanddatastoredinbiobanks |