Cargando…

Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks

BACKGROUND: Balancing the rights and obligations of custodians and applicants in relation to access to biobanks is of utmost importance to guarantee trust and confidence. This study aimed to reveal which issues divide different stakeholders in an attempt to determine the rights and/or obligations he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verlinden, Michiel, Nys, Herman, Ectors, Nadine, Huys, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0
_version_ 1782418574192672768
author Verlinden, Michiel
Nys, Herman
Ectors, Nadine
Huys, Isabelle
author_facet Verlinden, Michiel
Nys, Herman
Ectors, Nadine
Huys, Isabelle
author_sort Verlinden, Michiel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Balancing the rights and obligations of custodians and applicants in relation to access to biobanks is of utmost importance to guarantee trust and confidence. This study aimed to reveal which issues divide different stakeholders in an attempt to determine the rights and/or obligations held on human biological materials (HBM) and data. METHODS: Twenty-eight informants in the Benelux and Scandinavia were interviewed in order to capture the perspectives of experts and stakeholders in relation to the rights and obligations held by custodians and applicants with respect to access to HBM and data. RESULTS: There was no consensus among the informants on whether the custodian of a biobank should decide upon the scientific merits and the utility of an access request. Nearly all informants agreed that a new request or an amendment to the initial request has to be submitted when an applicant wants to use leftover HBM in a new or follow-up project. Several informants felt that it might be justified to charge higher access fees to external or industrial applicants that did not contribute (directly or indirectly) to the collection of HBM and data. Most informants agreed that a custodian of a biobank could request the sharing and return of research results. It was furthermore argued that some of the benefits of research projects should be fed back into biobanks. CONCLUSIONS: The interviews revealed a rather complex web of rights and obligations allocated to the custodian and the applicant in relation to access to HBM and data stored in biobanks. Some rights and obligations are negotiated on a case-by-case basis, while others are stipulated in access arrangements. We did find a consensus on the attribution of certain general rights to the custodians and the applicant. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4772467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47724672016-03-02 Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks Verlinden, Michiel Nys, Herman Ectors, Nadine Huys, Isabelle BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Balancing the rights and obligations of custodians and applicants in relation to access to biobanks is of utmost importance to guarantee trust and confidence. This study aimed to reveal which issues divide different stakeholders in an attempt to determine the rights and/or obligations held on human biological materials (HBM) and data. METHODS: Twenty-eight informants in the Benelux and Scandinavia were interviewed in order to capture the perspectives of experts and stakeholders in relation to the rights and obligations held by custodians and applicants with respect to access to HBM and data. RESULTS: There was no consensus among the informants on whether the custodian of a biobank should decide upon the scientific merits and the utility of an access request. Nearly all informants agreed that a new request or an amendment to the initial request has to be submitted when an applicant wants to use leftover HBM in a new or follow-up project. Several informants felt that it might be justified to charge higher access fees to external or industrial applicants that did not contribute (directly or indirectly) to the collection of HBM and data. Most informants agreed that a custodian of a biobank could request the sharing and return of research results. It was furthermore argued that some of the benefits of research projects should be fed back into biobanks. CONCLUSIONS: The interviews revealed a rather complex web of rights and obligations allocated to the custodian and the applicant in relation to access to HBM and data stored in biobanks. Some rights and obligations are negotiated on a case-by-case basis, while others are stipulated in access arrangements. We did find a consensus on the attribution of certain general rights to the custodians and the applicant. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4772467/ /pubmed/26926004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0 Text en © Verlinden et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Verlinden, Michiel
Nys, Herman
Ectors, Nadine
Huys, Isabelle
Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks
title Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks
title_full Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks
title_fullStr Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks
title_short Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks
title_sort qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0098-0
work_keys_str_mv AT verlindenmichiel qualitativestudyoncustodianshipofhumanbiologicalmaterialanddatastoredinbiobanks
AT nysherman qualitativestudyoncustodianshipofhumanbiologicalmaterialanddatastoredinbiobanks
AT ectorsnadine qualitativestudyoncustodianshipofhumanbiologicalmaterialanddatastoredinbiobanks
AT huysisabelle qualitativestudyoncustodianshipofhumanbiologicalmaterialanddatastoredinbiobanks