Cargando…

Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire-Rheumatology (PUQ-R): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: An in-depth qualitative exploration of uncertainty in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) led to the development of a five-domain conceptual framework of patient uncertainty in these two conditions. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cleanthous, Sophie, Isenberg, David Alan, Newman, Stanton Peter, Cano, Stefan John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26927364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0432-8
_version_ 1782418587130003456
author Cleanthous, Sophie
Isenberg, David Alan
Newman, Stanton Peter
Cano, Stefan John
author_facet Cleanthous, Sophie
Isenberg, David Alan
Newman, Stanton Peter
Cano, Stefan John
author_sort Cleanthous, Sophie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An in-depth qualitative exploration of uncertainty in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) led to the development of a five-domain conceptual framework of patient uncertainty in these two conditions. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for patient uncertainty in SLE and RA on the basis of this empirically developed conceptual framework. METHODS: Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to pre-test the initial items generated on the basis of the preliminary qualitative exploration of patient uncertainty in SLE and RA. Two separate field tests were conducted in five hospital sites to evaluate the measurement properties of the new instrument; the first to identify and form scales, and the second to assess measurement properties of the final version in an independent sample. Psychometric evaluation was conducted in line with the Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT), examining the extent to which sample to scale targeting was satisfactory, measurement scales were constructed effectively and the sample was measured successfully. Traditional psychometric techniques were also used to provide complementary analyses best understood by clinicians. RESULTS: Pre-testing supported the relevance, acceptability and comprehensibility of the initial items. Findings indicated that the Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire for Rheumatology PUQ-R instrument fulfilled the expectations of RMT to a large extent (including person separation index 0.73 – 0.91). The PUQ-R comprises 49 items across five scales; symptoms and flares (14 items), medication (11 items), trust in doctor (8 items), self-management (6 items) and impact (10 items) which further displayed excellent measurement properties as assessed against the traditional psychometric criteria (including Cronbach’s alpha 0.82 – 0.93). CONCLUSION: The PUQ-R has been developed and evaluated specifically for patients with SLE and RA. By quantifying uncertainty, the PUQ-R has the potential to support evidence-based management programmes and research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0432-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4772528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47725282016-03-02 Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire-Rheumatology (PUQ-R): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a mixed methods study Cleanthous, Sophie Isenberg, David Alan Newman, Stanton Peter Cano, Stefan John Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: An in-depth qualitative exploration of uncertainty in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) led to the development of a five-domain conceptual framework of patient uncertainty in these two conditions. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for patient uncertainty in SLE and RA on the basis of this empirically developed conceptual framework. METHODS: Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to pre-test the initial items generated on the basis of the preliminary qualitative exploration of patient uncertainty in SLE and RA. Two separate field tests were conducted in five hospital sites to evaluate the measurement properties of the new instrument; the first to identify and form scales, and the second to assess measurement properties of the final version in an independent sample. Psychometric evaluation was conducted in line with the Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT), examining the extent to which sample to scale targeting was satisfactory, measurement scales were constructed effectively and the sample was measured successfully. Traditional psychometric techniques were also used to provide complementary analyses best understood by clinicians. RESULTS: Pre-testing supported the relevance, acceptability and comprehensibility of the initial items. Findings indicated that the Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire for Rheumatology PUQ-R instrument fulfilled the expectations of RMT to a large extent (including person separation index 0.73 – 0.91). The PUQ-R comprises 49 items across five scales; symptoms and flares (14 items), medication (11 items), trust in doctor (8 items), self-management (6 items) and impact (10 items) which further displayed excellent measurement properties as assessed against the traditional psychometric criteria (including Cronbach’s alpha 0.82 – 0.93). CONCLUSION: The PUQ-R has been developed and evaluated specifically for patients with SLE and RA. By quantifying uncertainty, the PUQ-R has the potential to support evidence-based management programmes and research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0432-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4772528/ /pubmed/26927364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0432-8 Text en © Cleanthous et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Cleanthous, Sophie
Isenberg, David Alan
Newman, Stanton Peter
Cano, Stefan John
Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire-Rheumatology (PUQ-R): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a mixed methods study
title Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire-Rheumatology (PUQ-R): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a mixed methods study
title_full Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire-Rheumatology (PUQ-R): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire-Rheumatology (PUQ-R): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire-Rheumatology (PUQ-R): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a mixed methods study
title_short Patient Uncertainty Questionnaire-Rheumatology (PUQ-R): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a mixed methods study
title_sort patient uncertainty questionnaire-rheumatology (puq-r): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for systemic lupus erythematosus (sle) and rheumatoid arthritis (ra) in a mixed methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26927364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0432-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cleanthoussophie patientuncertaintyquestionnairerheumatologypuqrdevelopmentandvalidationofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentforsystemiclupuserythematosussleandrheumatoidarthritisrainamixedmethodsstudy
AT isenbergdavidalan patientuncertaintyquestionnairerheumatologypuqrdevelopmentandvalidationofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentforsystemiclupuserythematosussleandrheumatoidarthritisrainamixedmethodsstudy
AT newmanstantonpeter patientuncertaintyquestionnairerheumatologypuqrdevelopmentandvalidationofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentforsystemiclupuserythematosussleandrheumatoidarthritisrainamixedmethodsstudy
AT canostefanjohn patientuncertaintyquestionnairerheumatologypuqrdevelopmentandvalidationofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentforsystemiclupuserythematosussleandrheumatoidarthritisrainamixedmethodsstudy