Cargando…

Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort

Typically, understanding speech seems effortless and automatic. However, a variety of factors may, independently or interactively, make listening more effortful. Physiological measures may help to distinguish between the application of different cognitive mechanisms whose operation is perceived as e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francis, Alexander L., MacPherson, Megan K., Chandrasekaran, Bharath, Alvar, Ann M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00263
_version_ 1782418600173240320
author Francis, Alexander L.
MacPherson, Megan K.
Chandrasekaran, Bharath
Alvar, Ann M.
author_facet Francis, Alexander L.
MacPherson, Megan K.
Chandrasekaran, Bharath
Alvar, Ann M.
author_sort Francis, Alexander L.
collection PubMed
description Typically, understanding speech seems effortless and automatic. However, a variety of factors may, independently or interactively, make listening more effortful. Physiological measures may help to distinguish between the application of different cognitive mechanisms whose operation is perceived as effortful. In the present study, physiological and behavioral measures associated with task demand were collected along with behavioral measures of performance while participants listened to and repeated sentences. The goal was to measure psychophysiological reactivity associated with three degraded listening conditions, each of which differed in terms of the source of the difficulty (distortion, energetic masking, and informational masking), and therefore were expected to engage different cognitive mechanisms. These conditions were chosen to be matched for overall performance (keywords correct), and were compared to listening to unmasked speech produced by a natural voice. The three degraded conditions were: (1) Unmasked speech produced by a computer speech synthesizer, (2) Speech produced by a natural voice and masked byspeech-shaped noise and (3) Speech produced by a natural voice and masked by two-talker babble. Masked conditions were both presented at a -8 dB signal to noise ratio (SNR), a level shown in previous research to result in comparable levels of performance for these stimuli and maskers. Performance was measured in terms of proportion of key words identified correctly, and task demand or effort was quantified subjectively by self-report. Measures of psychophysiological reactivity included electrodermal (skin conductance) response frequency and amplitude, blood pulse amplitude and pulse rate. Results suggest that the two masked conditions evoked stronger psychophysiological reactivity than did the two unmasked conditions even when behavioral measures of listening performance and listeners’ subjective perception of task demand were comparable across the three degraded conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4772584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47725842016-03-11 Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort Francis, Alexander L. MacPherson, Megan K. Chandrasekaran, Bharath Alvar, Ann M. Front Psychol Psychology Typically, understanding speech seems effortless and automatic. However, a variety of factors may, independently or interactively, make listening more effortful. Physiological measures may help to distinguish between the application of different cognitive mechanisms whose operation is perceived as effortful. In the present study, physiological and behavioral measures associated with task demand were collected along with behavioral measures of performance while participants listened to and repeated sentences. The goal was to measure psychophysiological reactivity associated with three degraded listening conditions, each of which differed in terms of the source of the difficulty (distortion, energetic masking, and informational masking), and therefore were expected to engage different cognitive mechanisms. These conditions were chosen to be matched for overall performance (keywords correct), and were compared to listening to unmasked speech produced by a natural voice. The three degraded conditions were: (1) Unmasked speech produced by a computer speech synthesizer, (2) Speech produced by a natural voice and masked byspeech-shaped noise and (3) Speech produced by a natural voice and masked by two-talker babble. Masked conditions were both presented at a -8 dB signal to noise ratio (SNR), a level shown in previous research to result in comparable levels of performance for these stimuli and maskers. Performance was measured in terms of proportion of key words identified correctly, and task demand or effort was quantified subjectively by self-report. Measures of psychophysiological reactivity included electrodermal (skin conductance) response frequency and amplitude, blood pulse amplitude and pulse rate. Results suggest that the two masked conditions evoked stronger psychophysiological reactivity than did the two unmasked conditions even when behavioral measures of listening performance and listeners’ subjective perception of task demand were comparable across the three degraded conditions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4772584/ /pubmed/26973564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00263 Text en Copyright © 2016 Francis, MacPherson, Chandrasekaran and Alvar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Francis, Alexander L.
MacPherson, Megan K.
Chandrasekaran, Bharath
Alvar, Ann M.
Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort
title Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort
title_full Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort
title_fullStr Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort
title_full_unstemmed Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort
title_short Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort
title_sort autonomic nervous system responses during perception of masked speech may reflect constructs other than subjective listening effort
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00263
work_keys_str_mv AT francisalexanderl autonomicnervoussystemresponsesduringperceptionofmaskedspeechmayreflectconstructsotherthansubjectivelisteningeffort
AT macphersonmegank autonomicnervoussystemresponsesduringperceptionofmaskedspeechmayreflectconstructsotherthansubjectivelisteningeffort
AT chandrasekaranbharath autonomicnervoussystemresponsesduringperceptionofmaskedspeechmayreflectconstructsotherthansubjectivelisteningeffort
AT alvarannm autonomicnervoussystemresponsesduringperceptionofmaskedspeechmayreflectconstructsotherthansubjectivelisteningeffort