Cargando…

Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is a common geriatric syndrome associated with serious adverse health outcomes. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) suggests different methods for case finding for sarcopenia. However, data comparing the different methodological options are scarce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reiss, Jens, Iglseder, Bernhard, Kreutzer, Martina, Weilbuchner, Ingrid, Treschnitzer, Wolfgang, Kässmann, Helmut, Pirich, Christian, Reiter, Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26928275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0228-z
_version_ 1782418609703747584
author Reiss, Jens
Iglseder, Bernhard
Kreutzer, Martina
Weilbuchner, Ingrid
Treschnitzer, Wolfgang
Kässmann, Helmut
Pirich, Christian
Reiter, Raphael
author_facet Reiss, Jens
Iglseder, Bernhard
Kreutzer, Martina
Weilbuchner, Ingrid
Treschnitzer, Wolfgang
Kässmann, Helmut
Pirich, Christian
Reiter, Raphael
author_sort Reiss, Jens
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is a common geriatric syndrome associated with serious adverse health outcomes. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) suggests different methods for case finding for sarcopenia. However, data comparing the different methodological options are scarce for geriatric inpatients. METHODS: On the basis of the recommendations of the EWGSOP sixty geriatric inpatients underwent measurement of gait speed, hand grip strength and muscle mass by both, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA). By linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots muscle mass measurements of DXA and BIA were compared. Outcomes of the DXA- and BIA-based approaches for classifying participants as having normal or reduced muscle mass and sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP case finding algorithm were compared by raw agreement and kappa statistics. Finally, on the hypothetical assumption that the DXA-based approach can be set as reference, the performance of the BIA-based approach is illustrated. RESULTS: Muscle mass measured by BIA was highly correlated to DXA (r > 0.9), but BIA systematically overestimated muscle mass. The mean difference between DXA and BIA was −1.30 kg (p < 0.001) for appendicular and −2.33 kg (p < 0.001) for total muscle mass. The raw agreement between the DXA- and BIA-based approaches for classifying participants as having normal or reduced muscle mass was at best 80 % depending on the BIA cut-offs used. Functional prescreening according to the sarcopenia case finding algorithm of the EWGSOP reduced the need for muscle mass measurement by 37 %, but only marginally changed the agreement between the DXA- and BIA-based approaches. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware that in geriatric inpatients the BIA-based approaches resulted in highly different subgroups of sarcopenic/non-sarcopenic subjects compared to the DXA-based approach following the EWGSOP case finding algorithm. In this pilot-study the BIA-based approach misclassified nearly 1 out of 6 patients if the DXA-based approach is taken as reference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4772647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47726472016-03-02 Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry Reiss, Jens Iglseder, Bernhard Kreutzer, Martina Weilbuchner, Ingrid Treschnitzer, Wolfgang Kässmann, Helmut Pirich, Christian Reiter, Raphael BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is a common geriatric syndrome associated with serious adverse health outcomes. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) suggests different methods for case finding for sarcopenia. However, data comparing the different methodological options are scarce for geriatric inpatients. METHODS: On the basis of the recommendations of the EWGSOP sixty geriatric inpatients underwent measurement of gait speed, hand grip strength and muscle mass by both, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA). By linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots muscle mass measurements of DXA and BIA were compared. Outcomes of the DXA- and BIA-based approaches for classifying participants as having normal or reduced muscle mass and sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP case finding algorithm were compared by raw agreement and kappa statistics. Finally, on the hypothetical assumption that the DXA-based approach can be set as reference, the performance of the BIA-based approach is illustrated. RESULTS: Muscle mass measured by BIA was highly correlated to DXA (r > 0.9), but BIA systematically overestimated muscle mass. The mean difference between DXA and BIA was −1.30 kg (p < 0.001) for appendicular and −2.33 kg (p < 0.001) for total muscle mass. The raw agreement between the DXA- and BIA-based approaches for classifying participants as having normal or reduced muscle mass was at best 80 % depending on the BIA cut-offs used. Functional prescreening according to the sarcopenia case finding algorithm of the EWGSOP reduced the need for muscle mass measurement by 37 %, but only marginally changed the agreement between the DXA- and BIA-based approaches. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware that in geriatric inpatients the BIA-based approaches resulted in highly different subgroups of sarcopenic/non-sarcopenic subjects compared to the DXA-based approach following the EWGSOP case finding algorithm. In this pilot-study the BIA-based approach misclassified nearly 1 out of 6 patients if the DXA-based approach is taken as reference. BioMed Central 2016-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4772647/ /pubmed/26928275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0228-z Text en © Reiss et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reiss, Jens
Iglseder, Bernhard
Kreutzer, Martina
Weilbuchner, Ingrid
Treschnitzer, Wolfgang
Kässmann, Helmut
Pirich, Christian
Reiter, Raphael
Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry
title Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry
title_full Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry
title_fullStr Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry
title_full_unstemmed Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry
title_short Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry
title_sort case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual x-ray absorptiometry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26928275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0228-z
work_keys_str_mv AT reissjens casefindingforsarcopeniaingeriatricinpatientsperformanceofbioimpedanceanalysisincomparisontodualxrayabsorptiometry
AT iglsederbernhard casefindingforsarcopeniaingeriatricinpatientsperformanceofbioimpedanceanalysisincomparisontodualxrayabsorptiometry
AT kreutzermartina casefindingforsarcopeniaingeriatricinpatientsperformanceofbioimpedanceanalysisincomparisontodualxrayabsorptiometry
AT weilbuchneringrid casefindingforsarcopeniaingeriatricinpatientsperformanceofbioimpedanceanalysisincomparisontodualxrayabsorptiometry
AT treschnitzerwolfgang casefindingforsarcopeniaingeriatricinpatientsperformanceofbioimpedanceanalysisincomparisontodualxrayabsorptiometry
AT kassmannhelmut casefindingforsarcopeniaingeriatricinpatientsperformanceofbioimpedanceanalysisincomparisontodualxrayabsorptiometry
AT pirichchristian casefindingforsarcopeniaingeriatricinpatientsperformanceofbioimpedanceanalysisincomparisontodualxrayabsorptiometry
AT reiterraphael casefindingforsarcopeniaingeriatricinpatientsperformanceofbioimpedanceanalysisincomparisontodualxrayabsorptiometry