Cargando…

Methodological support for the further abstraction of and philosophical examination of empirical findings in the context of caring science

Phenomena in caring science are often complex and laden with meanings. Empirical research with the aim of capturing lived experiences is one way of revealing the complexity. Sometimes, however, results from empirical research need to be further discussed. One way is to further abstract the result an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindberg, Elisabeth, Österberg, Sofia A., Hörberg, Ulrica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26925926
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30482
_version_ 1782418617753665536
author Lindberg, Elisabeth
Österberg, Sofia A.
Hörberg, Ulrica
author_facet Lindberg, Elisabeth
Österberg, Sofia A.
Hörberg, Ulrica
author_sort Lindberg, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description Phenomena in caring science are often complex and laden with meanings. Empirical research with the aim of capturing lived experiences is one way of revealing the complexity. Sometimes, however, results from empirical research need to be further discussed. One way is to further abstract the result and/or philosophically examine it. This has previously been performed and presented in scientific journals and doctoral theses, contributing to a greater understanding of phenomena in caring science. Although the intentions in many of these publications are laudable, the lack of methodological descriptions as well as a theoretical and systematic foundation can contribute to an ambiguity concerning how the results have emerged during the analysis. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodological support for the further abstraction of and/or philosophical examination of empirical findings. When trying to systematize the support procedures, we have used a reflective lifeworld research (RLR) approach. Based on the assumptions in RLR, this article will present methodological support for a theoretical examination that can include two stages. In the first stage, data from several (two or more) empirical results on an essential level are synthesized into a general structure. Sometimes the analysis ends with the general structure, but sometimes there is a need to proceed further. The second stage can then be a philosophical examination, in which the general structure is discussed in relation to a philosophical text, theory, or concept. It is important that the theories are brought in as the final stage after the completion of the analysis. Core dimensions of the described methodological support are, in accordance with RLR, openness, bridling, and reflection. The methodological support cannot be understood as fixed stages, but rather as a guiding light in the search for further meanings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4772701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47727012016-03-21 Methodological support for the further abstraction of and philosophical examination of empirical findings in the context of caring science Lindberg, Elisabeth Österberg, Sofia A. Hörberg, Ulrica Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Theoretical/Philosophical Article Phenomena in caring science are often complex and laden with meanings. Empirical research with the aim of capturing lived experiences is one way of revealing the complexity. Sometimes, however, results from empirical research need to be further discussed. One way is to further abstract the result and/or philosophically examine it. This has previously been performed and presented in scientific journals and doctoral theses, contributing to a greater understanding of phenomena in caring science. Although the intentions in many of these publications are laudable, the lack of methodological descriptions as well as a theoretical and systematic foundation can contribute to an ambiguity concerning how the results have emerged during the analysis. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodological support for the further abstraction of and/or philosophical examination of empirical findings. When trying to systematize the support procedures, we have used a reflective lifeworld research (RLR) approach. Based on the assumptions in RLR, this article will present methodological support for a theoretical examination that can include two stages. In the first stage, data from several (two or more) empirical results on an essential level are synthesized into a general structure. Sometimes the analysis ends with the general structure, but sometimes there is a need to proceed further. The second stage can then be a philosophical examination, in which the general structure is discussed in relation to a philosophical text, theory, or concept. It is important that the theories are brought in as the final stage after the completion of the analysis. Core dimensions of the described methodological support are, in accordance with RLR, openness, bridling, and reflection. The methodological support cannot be understood as fixed stages, but rather as a guiding light in the search for further meanings. Co-Action Publishing 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4772701/ /pubmed/26925926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30482 Text en © 2016 E. Lindberg et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Theoretical/Philosophical Article
Lindberg, Elisabeth
Österberg, Sofia A.
Hörberg, Ulrica
Methodological support for the further abstraction of and philosophical examination of empirical findings in the context of caring science
title Methodological support for the further abstraction of and philosophical examination of empirical findings in the context of caring science
title_full Methodological support for the further abstraction of and philosophical examination of empirical findings in the context of caring science
title_fullStr Methodological support for the further abstraction of and philosophical examination of empirical findings in the context of caring science
title_full_unstemmed Methodological support for the further abstraction of and philosophical examination of empirical findings in the context of caring science
title_short Methodological support for the further abstraction of and philosophical examination of empirical findings in the context of caring science
title_sort methodological support for the further abstraction of and philosophical examination of empirical findings in the context of caring science
topic Theoretical/Philosophical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26925926
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30482
work_keys_str_mv AT lindbergelisabeth methodologicalsupportforthefurtherabstractionofandphilosophicalexaminationofempiricalfindingsinthecontextofcaringscience
AT osterbergsofiaa methodologicalsupportforthefurtherabstractionofandphilosophicalexaminationofempiricalfindingsinthecontextofcaringscience
AT horbergulrica methodologicalsupportforthefurtherabstractionofandphilosophicalexaminationofempiricalfindingsinthecontextofcaringscience