Cargando…

Comparing Tuberculosis Diagnostic Yield in Smear/Culture and Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-Based Algorithms Using a Non-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Design

SETTING: Primary health services in Cape Town, South Africa. STUDY AIM: To compare tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic yield in an existing smear/culture-based and a newly introduced Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-based algorithm. METHODS: TB diagnostic yield (the proportion of presumptive TB cases with a laboratory dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naidoo, Pren, Dunbar, Rory, Lombard, Carl, du Toit, Elizabeth, Caldwell, Judy, Detjen, Anne, Squire, S. Bertel, Enarson, Donald A., Beyers, Nulda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26930400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150487
_version_ 1782418679955193856
author Naidoo, Pren
Dunbar, Rory
Lombard, Carl
du Toit, Elizabeth
Caldwell, Judy
Detjen, Anne
Squire, S. Bertel
Enarson, Donald A.
Beyers, Nulda
author_facet Naidoo, Pren
Dunbar, Rory
Lombard, Carl
du Toit, Elizabeth
Caldwell, Judy
Detjen, Anne
Squire, S. Bertel
Enarson, Donald A.
Beyers, Nulda
author_sort Naidoo, Pren
collection PubMed
description SETTING: Primary health services in Cape Town, South Africa. STUDY AIM: To compare tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic yield in an existing smear/culture-based and a newly introduced Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-based algorithm. METHODS: TB diagnostic yield (the proportion of presumptive TB cases with a laboratory diagnosis of TB) was assessed using a non-randomised stepped-wedge design as sites transitioned to the Xpert(®) based algorithm. We identified the full sequence of sputum tests recorded in the electronic laboratory database for presumptive TB cases from 60 primary health sites during seven one-month time-points, six months apart. Differences in TB yield and temporal trends were estimated using a binomial regression model. RESULTS: TB yield was 20.9% (95% CI 19.9% to 22.0%) in the smear/culture-based algorithm compared to 17.9% (95%CI 16.4% to 19.5%) in the Xpert(®) based algorithm. There was a decline in TB yield over time with a mean risk difference of -0.9% (95% CI -1.2% to -0.6%) (p<0.001) per time-point. When estimates were adjusted for the temporal trend, TB yield was 19.1% (95% CI 17.6% to 20.5%) in the smear/culture-based algorithm compared to 19.3% (95% CI 17.7% to 20.9%) in the Xpert(®) based algorithm with a risk difference of 0.3% (95% CI -1.8% to 2.3%) (p = 0.796). Culture tests were undertaken for 35.5% of smear-negative compared to 17.9% of Xpert(®) negative low MDR-TB risk cases and for 82.6% of smear-negative compared to 40.5% of Xpert(®) negative high MDR-TB risk cases in respective algorithms. CONCLUSION: Introduction of an Xpert(®) based algorithm did not produce the expected increase in TB diagnostic yield. Studies are required to assess whether improving adherence to the Xpert(®) negative algorithm for HIV-infected individuals will increase yield. In light of the high cost of Xpert(®), a review of its role as a screening test for all presumptive TB cases may be warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4773132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47731322016-03-07 Comparing Tuberculosis Diagnostic Yield in Smear/Culture and Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-Based Algorithms Using a Non-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Design Naidoo, Pren Dunbar, Rory Lombard, Carl du Toit, Elizabeth Caldwell, Judy Detjen, Anne Squire, S. Bertel Enarson, Donald A. Beyers, Nulda PLoS One Research Article SETTING: Primary health services in Cape Town, South Africa. STUDY AIM: To compare tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic yield in an existing smear/culture-based and a newly introduced Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-based algorithm. METHODS: TB diagnostic yield (the proportion of presumptive TB cases with a laboratory diagnosis of TB) was assessed using a non-randomised stepped-wedge design as sites transitioned to the Xpert(®) based algorithm. We identified the full sequence of sputum tests recorded in the electronic laboratory database for presumptive TB cases from 60 primary health sites during seven one-month time-points, six months apart. Differences in TB yield and temporal trends were estimated using a binomial regression model. RESULTS: TB yield was 20.9% (95% CI 19.9% to 22.0%) in the smear/culture-based algorithm compared to 17.9% (95%CI 16.4% to 19.5%) in the Xpert(®) based algorithm. There was a decline in TB yield over time with a mean risk difference of -0.9% (95% CI -1.2% to -0.6%) (p<0.001) per time-point. When estimates were adjusted for the temporal trend, TB yield was 19.1% (95% CI 17.6% to 20.5%) in the smear/culture-based algorithm compared to 19.3% (95% CI 17.7% to 20.9%) in the Xpert(®) based algorithm with a risk difference of 0.3% (95% CI -1.8% to 2.3%) (p = 0.796). Culture tests were undertaken for 35.5% of smear-negative compared to 17.9% of Xpert(®) negative low MDR-TB risk cases and for 82.6% of smear-negative compared to 40.5% of Xpert(®) negative high MDR-TB risk cases in respective algorithms. CONCLUSION: Introduction of an Xpert(®) based algorithm did not produce the expected increase in TB diagnostic yield. Studies are required to assess whether improving adherence to the Xpert(®) negative algorithm for HIV-infected individuals will increase yield. In light of the high cost of Xpert(®), a review of its role as a screening test for all presumptive TB cases may be warranted. Public Library of Science 2016-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4773132/ /pubmed/26930400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150487 Text en © 2016 Naidoo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Naidoo, Pren
Dunbar, Rory
Lombard, Carl
du Toit, Elizabeth
Caldwell, Judy
Detjen, Anne
Squire, S. Bertel
Enarson, Donald A.
Beyers, Nulda
Comparing Tuberculosis Diagnostic Yield in Smear/Culture and Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-Based Algorithms Using a Non-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Design
title Comparing Tuberculosis Diagnostic Yield in Smear/Culture and Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-Based Algorithms Using a Non-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Design
title_full Comparing Tuberculosis Diagnostic Yield in Smear/Culture and Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-Based Algorithms Using a Non-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Design
title_fullStr Comparing Tuberculosis Diagnostic Yield in Smear/Culture and Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-Based Algorithms Using a Non-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Design
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Tuberculosis Diagnostic Yield in Smear/Culture and Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-Based Algorithms Using a Non-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Design
title_short Comparing Tuberculosis Diagnostic Yield in Smear/Culture and Xpert(®) MTB/RIF-Based Algorithms Using a Non-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Design
title_sort comparing tuberculosis diagnostic yield in smear/culture and xpert(®) mtb/rif-based algorithms using a non-randomised stepped-wedge design
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26930400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150487
work_keys_str_mv AT naidoopren comparingtuberculosisdiagnosticyieldinsmearcultureandxpertmtbrifbasedalgorithmsusinganonrandomisedsteppedwedgedesign
AT dunbarrory comparingtuberculosisdiagnosticyieldinsmearcultureandxpertmtbrifbasedalgorithmsusinganonrandomisedsteppedwedgedesign
AT lombardcarl comparingtuberculosisdiagnosticyieldinsmearcultureandxpertmtbrifbasedalgorithmsusinganonrandomisedsteppedwedgedesign
AT dutoitelizabeth comparingtuberculosisdiagnosticyieldinsmearcultureandxpertmtbrifbasedalgorithmsusinganonrandomisedsteppedwedgedesign
AT caldwelljudy comparingtuberculosisdiagnosticyieldinsmearcultureandxpertmtbrifbasedalgorithmsusinganonrandomisedsteppedwedgedesign
AT detjenanne comparingtuberculosisdiagnosticyieldinsmearcultureandxpertmtbrifbasedalgorithmsusinganonrandomisedsteppedwedgedesign
AT squiresbertel comparingtuberculosisdiagnosticyieldinsmearcultureandxpertmtbrifbasedalgorithmsusinganonrandomisedsteppedwedgedesign
AT enarsondonalda comparingtuberculosisdiagnosticyieldinsmearcultureandxpertmtbrifbasedalgorithmsusinganonrandomisedsteppedwedgedesign
AT beyersnulda comparingtuberculosisdiagnosticyieldinsmearcultureandxpertmtbrifbasedalgorithmsusinganonrandomisedsteppedwedgedesign