Cargando…

A Prospective Randomized Experimental Study to Investigate the Eradication Rate of Endometriosis after Surgical Resection versus Aerosol Plasma Coagulation in a Rat Model

Purpose To investigate the eradication rate of endometriosis after surgical resection (SR) vs. thermal ablation with aerosol plasma coagulation (AePC) in a rat model. Methods In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded animal study endometriosis was induced on the abdominal wall of 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rothmund, Ralf, Scharpf, Marcus, Tsaousidis, Christos, Planck, Constanze, Enderle, Markus Dominik, Neugebauer, Alexander, Kroeker, Kristin, Nuessle, Daniela, Fend, Falko, Brucker, Sara, Kraemer, Bernhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941579
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.14246
_version_ 1782418711761649664
author Rothmund, Ralf
Scharpf, Marcus
Tsaousidis, Christos
Planck, Constanze
Enderle, Markus Dominik
Neugebauer, Alexander
Kroeker, Kristin
Nuessle, Daniela
Fend, Falko
Brucker, Sara
Kraemer, Bernhard
author_facet Rothmund, Ralf
Scharpf, Marcus
Tsaousidis, Christos
Planck, Constanze
Enderle, Markus Dominik
Neugebauer, Alexander
Kroeker, Kristin
Nuessle, Daniela
Fend, Falko
Brucker, Sara
Kraemer, Bernhard
author_sort Rothmund, Ralf
collection PubMed
description Purpose To investigate the eradication rate of endometriosis after surgical resection (SR) vs. thermal ablation with aerosol plasma coagulation (AePC) in a rat model. Methods In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded animal study endometriosis was induced on the abdominal wall of 34 female Wistar rats. After 14 days endometriosis was either removed by SR or ablated by AePC. 14 days later the rats were euthanized to evaluate the eradication rate histopathologically. Intervention times were recorded. Results Eradication rate of endometriosis after 14 days did not significantly differ between AePC and SR (p=0.22). Intervention time per endometrial lesion was 22.1 s for AePC and 51.8 s for SR (p<0.0001). Conclusions This study compares the eradication rate of the new aerosol plasma coagulation device versus standard surgical resection of endometriosis in a rat model. Despite being a thermal method, AePC showed equality towards SR regarding eradication rate but with significantly shorter intervention time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4773283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47732832016-03-03 A Prospective Randomized Experimental Study to Investigate the Eradication Rate of Endometriosis after Surgical Resection versus Aerosol Plasma Coagulation in a Rat Model Rothmund, Ralf Scharpf, Marcus Tsaousidis, Christos Planck, Constanze Enderle, Markus Dominik Neugebauer, Alexander Kroeker, Kristin Nuessle, Daniela Fend, Falko Brucker, Sara Kraemer, Bernhard Int J Med Sci Research Paper Purpose To investigate the eradication rate of endometriosis after surgical resection (SR) vs. thermal ablation with aerosol plasma coagulation (AePC) in a rat model. Methods In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded animal study endometriosis was induced on the abdominal wall of 34 female Wistar rats. After 14 days endometriosis was either removed by SR or ablated by AePC. 14 days later the rats were euthanized to evaluate the eradication rate histopathologically. Intervention times were recorded. Results Eradication rate of endometriosis after 14 days did not significantly differ between AePC and SR (p=0.22). Intervention time per endometrial lesion was 22.1 s for AePC and 51.8 s for SR (p<0.0001). Conclusions This study compares the eradication rate of the new aerosol plasma coagulation device versus standard surgical resection of endometriosis in a rat model. Despite being a thermal method, AePC showed equality towards SR regarding eradication rate but with significantly shorter intervention time. Ivyspring International Publisher 2016-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4773283/ /pubmed/26941579 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.14246 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. See http://ivyspring.com/terms for terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Rothmund, Ralf
Scharpf, Marcus
Tsaousidis, Christos
Planck, Constanze
Enderle, Markus Dominik
Neugebauer, Alexander
Kroeker, Kristin
Nuessle, Daniela
Fend, Falko
Brucker, Sara
Kraemer, Bernhard
A Prospective Randomized Experimental Study to Investigate the Eradication Rate of Endometriosis after Surgical Resection versus Aerosol Plasma Coagulation in a Rat Model
title A Prospective Randomized Experimental Study to Investigate the Eradication Rate of Endometriosis after Surgical Resection versus Aerosol Plasma Coagulation in a Rat Model
title_full A Prospective Randomized Experimental Study to Investigate the Eradication Rate of Endometriosis after Surgical Resection versus Aerosol Plasma Coagulation in a Rat Model
title_fullStr A Prospective Randomized Experimental Study to Investigate the Eradication Rate of Endometriosis after Surgical Resection versus Aerosol Plasma Coagulation in a Rat Model
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Randomized Experimental Study to Investigate the Eradication Rate of Endometriosis after Surgical Resection versus Aerosol Plasma Coagulation in a Rat Model
title_short A Prospective Randomized Experimental Study to Investigate the Eradication Rate of Endometriosis after Surgical Resection versus Aerosol Plasma Coagulation in a Rat Model
title_sort prospective randomized experimental study to investigate the eradication rate of endometriosis after surgical resection versus aerosol plasma coagulation in a rat model
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941579
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.14246
work_keys_str_mv AT rothmundralf aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT scharpfmarcus aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT tsaousidischristos aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT planckconstanze aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT enderlemarkusdominik aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT neugebaueralexander aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT kroekerkristin aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT nuessledaniela aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT fendfalko aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT bruckersara aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT kraemerbernhard aprospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT rothmundralf prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT scharpfmarcus prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT tsaousidischristos prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT planckconstanze prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT enderlemarkusdominik prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT neugebaueralexander prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT kroekerkristin prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT nuessledaniela prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT fendfalko prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT bruckersara prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel
AT kraemerbernhard prospectiverandomizedexperimentalstudytoinvestigatetheeradicationrateofendometriosisaftersurgicalresectionversusaerosolplasmacoagulationinaratmodel