Cargando…
The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of solo surgery with single-port laparoscopic appendectomy, which is termed herein solo-SPLA (solo-single-port laparoscopic appendectomy). METHODS: This study prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from patients who had undergone...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Surgical Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942160 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.3.164 |
_version_ | 1782418744622972928 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Say-June Choi, Byung-Jo Jeong, Wonjun Lee, Sang Chul |
author_facet | Kim, Say-June Choi, Byung-Jo Jeong, Wonjun Lee, Sang Chul |
author_sort | Kim, Say-June |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of solo surgery with single-port laparoscopic appendectomy, which is termed herein solo-SPLA (solo-single-port laparoscopic appendectomy). METHODS: This study prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from patients who had undergone either non-solo-SPLA (n = 150) or solo-SPLA (n = 150). Several devices were utilized for complete, skin-to-skin solo-SPSA, including a Lone Star Retractor System and an adjustable mechanical camera holder. RESULTS: Operating times were not significantly different between solo- and non-solo-SPLA (45.0 ± 21.0 minutes vs. 46.7 ± 26.1 minutes, P = 0.646). Most postoperative variables were also comparable between groups, including the necessity for intravenous analgesics (0.7 ± 1.2 ampules [solo-SPLA] vs. 0.9 ± 1.5 ampules [non-solo-SPLA], P = 0.092), time interval to gas passing (1.3 ± 1.0 days vs. 1.4 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.182), and the incidence of postoperative complications (4.0% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.153). Moreover, solo-SPLA effectively lowered the operating cost by reducing surgical personnel expenses. CONCLUSION: Solo-SPLA economized staff numbers and thus lowered hospital costs without lengthening of operating time. Therefore, solo-SPLA could be considered a safe and feasible alternative to non-solo-SPLA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4773461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Surgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47734612016-03-03 The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study Kim, Say-June Choi, Byung-Jo Jeong, Wonjun Lee, Sang Chul Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of solo surgery with single-port laparoscopic appendectomy, which is termed herein solo-SPLA (solo-single-port laparoscopic appendectomy). METHODS: This study prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from patients who had undergone either non-solo-SPLA (n = 150) or solo-SPLA (n = 150). Several devices were utilized for complete, skin-to-skin solo-SPSA, including a Lone Star Retractor System and an adjustable mechanical camera holder. RESULTS: Operating times were not significantly different between solo- and non-solo-SPLA (45.0 ± 21.0 minutes vs. 46.7 ± 26.1 minutes, P = 0.646). Most postoperative variables were also comparable between groups, including the necessity for intravenous analgesics (0.7 ± 1.2 ampules [solo-SPLA] vs. 0.9 ± 1.5 ampules [non-solo-SPLA], P = 0.092), time interval to gas passing (1.3 ± 1.0 days vs. 1.4 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.182), and the incidence of postoperative complications (4.0% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.153). Moreover, solo-SPLA effectively lowered the operating cost by reducing surgical personnel expenses. CONCLUSION: Solo-SPLA economized staff numbers and thus lowered hospital costs without lengthening of operating time. Therefore, solo-SPLA could be considered a safe and feasible alternative to non-solo-SPLA. The Korean Surgical Society 2016-03 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4773461/ /pubmed/26942160 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.3.164 Text en Copyright © 2016, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Say-June Choi, Byung-Jo Jeong, Wonjun Lee, Sang Chul The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study |
title | The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study |
title_full | The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study |
title_short | The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study |
title_sort | feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942160 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.3.164 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsayjune thefeasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy AT choibyungjo thefeasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy AT jeongwonjun thefeasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy AT leesangchul thefeasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy AT kimsayjune feasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy AT choibyungjo feasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy AT jeongwonjun feasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy AT leesangchul feasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy |