Cargando…

The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of solo surgery with single-port laparoscopic appendectomy, which is termed herein solo-SPLA (solo-single-port laparoscopic appendectomy). METHODS: This study prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from patients who had undergone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Say-June, Choi, Byung-Jo, Jeong, Wonjun, Lee, Sang Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942160
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.3.164
_version_ 1782418744622972928
author Kim, Say-June
Choi, Byung-Jo
Jeong, Wonjun
Lee, Sang Chul
author_facet Kim, Say-June
Choi, Byung-Jo
Jeong, Wonjun
Lee, Sang Chul
author_sort Kim, Say-June
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of solo surgery with single-port laparoscopic appendectomy, which is termed herein solo-SPLA (solo-single-port laparoscopic appendectomy). METHODS: This study prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from patients who had undergone either non-solo-SPLA (n = 150) or solo-SPLA (n = 150). Several devices were utilized for complete, skin-to-skin solo-SPSA, including a Lone Star Retractor System and an adjustable mechanical camera holder. RESULTS: Operating times were not significantly different between solo- and non-solo-SPLA (45.0 ± 21.0 minutes vs. 46.7 ± 26.1 minutes, P = 0.646). Most postoperative variables were also comparable between groups, including the necessity for intravenous analgesics (0.7 ± 1.2 ampules [solo-SPLA] vs. 0.9 ± 1.5 ampules [non-solo-SPLA], P = 0.092), time interval to gas passing (1.3 ± 1.0 days vs. 1.4 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.182), and the incidence of postoperative complications (4.0% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.153). Moreover, solo-SPLA effectively lowered the operating cost by reducing surgical personnel expenses. CONCLUSION: Solo-SPLA economized staff numbers and thus lowered hospital costs without lengthening of operating time. Therefore, solo-SPLA could be considered a safe and feasible alternative to non-solo-SPLA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4773461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47734612016-03-03 The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study Kim, Say-June Choi, Byung-Jo Jeong, Wonjun Lee, Sang Chul Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of solo surgery with single-port laparoscopic appendectomy, which is termed herein solo-SPLA (solo-single-port laparoscopic appendectomy). METHODS: This study prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from patients who had undergone either non-solo-SPLA (n = 150) or solo-SPLA (n = 150). Several devices were utilized for complete, skin-to-skin solo-SPSA, including a Lone Star Retractor System and an adjustable mechanical camera holder. RESULTS: Operating times were not significantly different between solo- and non-solo-SPLA (45.0 ± 21.0 minutes vs. 46.7 ± 26.1 minutes, P = 0.646). Most postoperative variables were also comparable between groups, including the necessity for intravenous analgesics (0.7 ± 1.2 ampules [solo-SPLA] vs. 0.9 ± 1.5 ampules [non-solo-SPLA], P = 0.092), time interval to gas passing (1.3 ± 1.0 days vs. 1.4 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.182), and the incidence of postoperative complications (4.0% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.153). Moreover, solo-SPLA effectively lowered the operating cost by reducing surgical personnel expenses. CONCLUSION: Solo-SPLA economized staff numbers and thus lowered hospital costs without lengthening of operating time. Therefore, solo-SPLA could be considered a safe and feasible alternative to non-solo-SPLA. The Korean Surgical Society 2016-03 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4773461/ /pubmed/26942160 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.3.164 Text en Copyright © 2016, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Say-June
Choi, Byung-Jo
Jeong, Wonjun
Lee, Sang Chul
The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study
title The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study
title_full The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study
title_fullStr The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study
title_short The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study
title_sort feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a solo approach: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942160
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.3.164
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsayjune thefeasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy
AT choibyungjo thefeasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy
AT jeongwonjun thefeasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy
AT leesangchul thefeasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy
AT kimsayjune feasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy
AT choibyungjo feasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy
AT jeongwonjun feasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy
AT leesangchul feasibilityofsingleportlaparoscopicappendectomyusingasoloapproachacomparativestudy