Cargando…

The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND: For patients with brain metastases, systemic disease burden has historically been accepted as a major determinant of overall survival (OS). However, less research has focused on specific history and physical findings made by clinicians and how such findings pertain to patient outcomes at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paydar, Ima, Oermann, Eric Karl, Knoll, Miriam, Lee, James, Collins, Brian Timothy, Ewend, Matthew, Kondziolka, Douglas, Collins, Sean P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973811
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00040
_version_ 1782418772953399296
author Paydar, Ima
Oermann, Eric Karl
Knoll, Miriam
Lee, James
Collins, Brian Timothy
Ewend, Matthew
Kondziolka, Douglas
Collins, Sean P.
author_facet Paydar, Ima
Oermann, Eric Karl
Knoll, Miriam
Lee, James
Collins, Brian Timothy
Ewend, Matthew
Kondziolka, Douglas
Collins, Sean P.
author_sort Paydar, Ima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients with brain metastases, systemic disease burden has historically been accepted as a major determinant of overall survival (OS). However, less research has focused on specific history and physical findings made by clinicians and how such findings pertain to patient outcomes at a given time point. The aim of this study is to determine how the initial clinical assessment of patients with brain metastases, as part of the history and physical at the time of consultation, correlates to patient prognosis. METHODS: We evaluated a prospective, multi-institutional database of 1523 brain metastases in 507 patients who were treated with radiosurgery (Gamma Knife or CyberKnife) from 2001 to 2014. Relevant history of present illness (HPI) and past medical history (PMH) variables included comorbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and seizure history. Physical exam findings included a sensory exam, motor exam, and cognitive function. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four patients were included in the final analysis with a median OS of 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.8–13.7 months). On univariate analysis, significant HPI predictors of OS included age, primary diagnosis, performance status, extracranial metastases, systemic disease status, and history of surgery. Significant predictors of OS from the PMH included cardiac, vascular, and infectious comorbidities. On a physical exam, findings consistent with cognitive deficits were predictive of worse OS. However, motor deficits or changes in vision were not predictive of worse OS. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, predictors of worse OS were primary diagnosis (p = 0.002), ECOG performance status (OR 1.73, p < 0.001), and presence of extracranial metastases (OR 1.22, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Neurological deficits and systemic comorbidities noted at presentation are not associated with worse overall prognosis for patients with brain metastases undergoing radiosurgery. When encountering new patients with brain metastases, the most informative patient-related characteristics that determine prognosis remain performance status, primary diagnosis, and extent of extracranial disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4773584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47735842016-03-11 The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery Paydar, Ima Oermann, Eric Karl Knoll, Miriam Lee, James Collins, Brian Timothy Ewend, Matthew Kondziolka, Douglas Collins, Sean P. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: For patients with brain metastases, systemic disease burden has historically been accepted as a major determinant of overall survival (OS). However, less research has focused on specific history and physical findings made by clinicians and how such findings pertain to patient outcomes at a given time point. The aim of this study is to determine how the initial clinical assessment of patients with brain metastases, as part of the history and physical at the time of consultation, correlates to patient prognosis. METHODS: We evaluated a prospective, multi-institutional database of 1523 brain metastases in 507 patients who were treated with radiosurgery (Gamma Knife or CyberKnife) from 2001 to 2014. Relevant history of present illness (HPI) and past medical history (PMH) variables included comorbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and seizure history. Physical exam findings included a sensory exam, motor exam, and cognitive function. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four patients were included in the final analysis with a median OS of 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.8–13.7 months). On univariate analysis, significant HPI predictors of OS included age, primary diagnosis, performance status, extracranial metastases, systemic disease status, and history of surgery. Significant predictors of OS from the PMH included cardiac, vascular, and infectious comorbidities. On a physical exam, findings consistent with cognitive deficits were predictive of worse OS. However, motor deficits or changes in vision were not predictive of worse OS. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, predictors of worse OS were primary diagnosis (p = 0.002), ECOG performance status (OR 1.73, p < 0.001), and presence of extracranial metastases (OR 1.22, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Neurological deficits and systemic comorbidities noted at presentation are not associated with worse overall prognosis for patients with brain metastases undergoing radiosurgery. When encountering new patients with brain metastases, the most informative patient-related characteristics that determine prognosis remain performance status, primary diagnosis, and extent of extracranial disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4773584/ /pubmed/26973811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00040 Text en Copyright © 2016 Paydar, Oermann, Knoll, Lee, Collins, Ewend, Kondziolka and Collins. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Paydar, Ima
Oermann, Eric Karl
Knoll, Miriam
Lee, James
Collins, Brian Timothy
Ewend, Matthew
Kondziolka, Douglas
Collins, Sean P.
The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery
title The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery
title_full The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery
title_fullStr The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery
title_full_unstemmed The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery
title_short The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery
title_sort value of the history and physical for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases considering radiosurgery
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973811
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00040
work_keys_str_mv AT paydarima thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT oermannerickarl thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT knollmiriam thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT leejames thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT collinsbriantimothy thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT ewendmatthew thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT kondziolkadouglas thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT collinsseanp thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT paydarima valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT oermannerickarl valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT knollmiriam valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT leejames valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT collinsbriantimothy valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT ewendmatthew valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT kondziolkadouglas valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery
AT collinsseanp valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery