Cargando…
The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery
BACKGROUND: For patients with brain metastases, systemic disease burden has historically been accepted as a major determinant of overall survival (OS). However, less research has focused on specific history and physical findings made by clinicians and how such findings pertain to patient outcomes at...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00040 |
_version_ | 1782418772953399296 |
---|---|
author | Paydar, Ima Oermann, Eric Karl Knoll, Miriam Lee, James Collins, Brian Timothy Ewend, Matthew Kondziolka, Douglas Collins, Sean P. |
author_facet | Paydar, Ima Oermann, Eric Karl Knoll, Miriam Lee, James Collins, Brian Timothy Ewend, Matthew Kondziolka, Douglas Collins, Sean P. |
author_sort | Paydar, Ima |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For patients with brain metastases, systemic disease burden has historically been accepted as a major determinant of overall survival (OS). However, less research has focused on specific history and physical findings made by clinicians and how such findings pertain to patient outcomes at a given time point. The aim of this study is to determine how the initial clinical assessment of patients with brain metastases, as part of the history and physical at the time of consultation, correlates to patient prognosis. METHODS: We evaluated a prospective, multi-institutional database of 1523 brain metastases in 507 patients who were treated with radiosurgery (Gamma Knife or CyberKnife) from 2001 to 2014. Relevant history of present illness (HPI) and past medical history (PMH) variables included comorbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and seizure history. Physical exam findings included a sensory exam, motor exam, and cognitive function. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four patients were included in the final analysis with a median OS of 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.8–13.7 months). On univariate analysis, significant HPI predictors of OS included age, primary diagnosis, performance status, extracranial metastases, systemic disease status, and history of surgery. Significant predictors of OS from the PMH included cardiac, vascular, and infectious comorbidities. On a physical exam, findings consistent with cognitive deficits were predictive of worse OS. However, motor deficits or changes in vision were not predictive of worse OS. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, predictors of worse OS were primary diagnosis (p = 0.002), ECOG performance status (OR 1.73, p < 0.001), and presence of extracranial metastases (OR 1.22, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Neurological deficits and systemic comorbidities noted at presentation are not associated with worse overall prognosis for patients with brain metastases undergoing radiosurgery. When encountering new patients with brain metastases, the most informative patient-related characteristics that determine prognosis remain performance status, primary diagnosis, and extent of extracranial disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4773584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47735842016-03-11 The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery Paydar, Ima Oermann, Eric Karl Knoll, Miriam Lee, James Collins, Brian Timothy Ewend, Matthew Kondziolka, Douglas Collins, Sean P. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: For patients with brain metastases, systemic disease burden has historically been accepted as a major determinant of overall survival (OS). However, less research has focused on specific history and physical findings made by clinicians and how such findings pertain to patient outcomes at a given time point. The aim of this study is to determine how the initial clinical assessment of patients with brain metastases, as part of the history and physical at the time of consultation, correlates to patient prognosis. METHODS: We evaluated a prospective, multi-institutional database of 1523 brain metastases in 507 patients who were treated with radiosurgery (Gamma Knife or CyberKnife) from 2001 to 2014. Relevant history of present illness (HPI) and past medical history (PMH) variables included comorbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and seizure history. Physical exam findings included a sensory exam, motor exam, and cognitive function. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four patients were included in the final analysis with a median OS of 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.8–13.7 months). On univariate analysis, significant HPI predictors of OS included age, primary diagnosis, performance status, extracranial metastases, systemic disease status, and history of surgery. Significant predictors of OS from the PMH included cardiac, vascular, and infectious comorbidities. On a physical exam, findings consistent with cognitive deficits were predictive of worse OS. However, motor deficits or changes in vision were not predictive of worse OS. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, predictors of worse OS were primary diagnosis (p = 0.002), ECOG performance status (OR 1.73, p < 0.001), and presence of extracranial metastases (OR 1.22, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Neurological deficits and systemic comorbidities noted at presentation are not associated with worse overall prognosis for patients with brain metastases undergoing radiosurgery. When encountering new patients with brain metastases, the most informative patient-related characteristics that determine prognosis remain performance status, primary diagnosis, and extent of extracranial disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4773584/ /pubmed/26973811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00040 Text en Copyright © 2016 Paydar, Oermann, Knoll, Lee, Collins, Ewend, Kondziolka and Collins. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Paydar, Ima Oermann, Eric Karl Knoll, Miriam Lee, James Collins, Brian Timothy Ewend, Matthew Kondziolka, Douglas Collins, Sean P. The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery |
title | The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery |
title_full | The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery |
title_fullStr | The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery |
title_short | The Value of the History and Physical for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases Considering Radiosurgery |
title_sort | value of the history and physical for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases considering radiosurgery |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paydarima thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT oermannerickarl thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT knollmiriam thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT leejames thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT collinsbriantimothy thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT ewendmatthew thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT kondziolkadouglas thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT collinsseanp thevalueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT paydarima valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT oermannerickarl valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT knollmiriam valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT leejames valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT collinsbriantimothy valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT ewendmatthew valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT kondziolkadouglas valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery AT collinsseanp valueofthehistoryandphysicalforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedbrainmetastasesconsideringradiosurgery |