Cargando…
Shock Wave Response of Iron-based In Situ Metallic Glass Matrix Composites
The response of amorphous steels to shock wave compression has been explored for the first time. Further, the effect of partial devitrification on the shock response of bulk metallic glasses is examined by conducting experiments on two iron-based in situ metallic glass matrix composites, containing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26932846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22568 |
_version_ | 1782418820286119936 |
---|---|
author | Khanolkar, Gauri R. Rauls, Michael B. Kelly, James P. Graeve, Olivia A. Hodge, Andrea M. Eliasson, Veronica |
author_facet | Khanolkar, Gauri R. Rauls, Michael B. Kelly, James P. Graeve, Olivia A. Hodge, Andrea M. Eliasson, Veronica |
author_sort | Khanolkar, Gauri R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The response of amorphous steels to shock wave compression has been explored for the first time. Further, the effect of partial devitrification on the shock response of bulk metallic glasses is examined by conducting experiments on two iron-based in situ metallic glass matrix composites, containing varying amounts of crystalline precipitates, both with initial composition Fe(49.7)Cr(17.7)Mn(1.9)Mo(7.4)W(1.6)B(15.2)C(3.8)Si(2.4). The samples, designated SAM2X5-600 and SAM2X5-630, are X-ray amorphous and partially crystalline, respectively, due to differences in sintering parameters during sample preparation. Shock response is determined by making velocity measurements using interferometry techniques at the rear free surface of the samples, which have been subjected to impact from a high-velocity projectile launched from a powder gun. Experiments have yielded results indicating a Hugoniot Elastic Limit (HEL) to be 8.58 ± 0.53 GPa for SAM2X5-600 and 11.76 ± 1.26 GPa for SAM2X5-630. The latter HEL result is higher than elastic limits for any BMG reported in the literature thus far. SAM2X5-600 catastrophically loses post-yield strength whereas SAM2X5-630, while showing some strain-softening, retains strength beyond the HEL. The presence of crystallinity within the amorphous matrix is thus seen to significantly aid in strengthening the material as well as preserving material strength beyond yielding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4773851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47738512016-03-09 Shock Wave Response of Iron-based In Situ Metallic Glass Matrix Composites Khanolkar, Gauri R. Rauls, Michael B. Kelly, James P. Graeve, Olivia A. Hodge, Andrea M. Eliasson, Veronica Sci Rep Article The response of amorphous steels to shock wave compression has been explored for the first time. Further, the effect of partial devitrification on the shock response of bulk metallic glasses is examined by conducting experiments on two iron-based in situ metallic glass matrix composites, containing varying amounts of crystalline precipitates, both with initial composition Fe(49.7)Cr(17.7)Mn(1.9)Mo(7.4)W(1.6)B(15.2)C(3.8)Si(2.4). The samples, designated SAM2X5-600 and SAM2X5-630, are X-ray amorphous and partially crystalline, respectively, due to differences in sintering parameters during sample preparation. Shock response is determined by making velocity measurements using interferometry techniques at the rear free surface of the samples, which have been subjected to impact from a high-velocity projectile launched from a powder gun. Experiments have yielded results indicating a Hugoniot Elastic Limit (HEL) to be 8.58 ± 0.53 GPa for SAM2X5-600 and 11.76 ± 1.26 GPa for SAM2X5-630. The latter HEL result is higher than elastic limits for any BMG reported in the literature thus far. SAM2X5-600 catastrophically loses post-yield strength whereas SAM2X5-630, while showing some strain-softening, retains strength beyond the HEL. The presence of crystallinity within the amorphous matrix is thus seen to significantly aid in strengthening the material as well as preserving material strength beyond yielding. Nature Publishing Group 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4773851/ /pubmed/26932846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22568 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Khanolkar, Gauri R. Rauls, Michael B. Kelly, James P. Graeve, Olivia A. Hodge, Andrea M. Eliasson, Veronica Shock Wave Response of Iron-based In Situ Metallic Glass Matrix Composites |
title | Shock Wave Response of Iron-based In Situ Metallic Glass Matrix Composites |
title_full | Shock Wave Response of Iron-based In Situ Metallic Glass Matrix Composites |
title_fullStr | Shock Wave Response of Iron-based In Situ Metallic Glass Matrix Composites |
title_full_unstemmed | Shock Wave Response of Iron-based In Situ Metallic Glass Matrix Composites |
title_short | Shock Wave Response of Iron-based In Situ Metallic Glass Matrix Composites |
title_sort | shock wave response of iron-based in situ metallic glass matrix composites |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4773851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26932846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanolkargaurir shockwaveresponseofironbasedinsitumetallicglassmatrixcomposites AT raulsmichaelb shockwaveresponseofironbasedinsitumetallicglassmatrixcomposites AT kellyjamesp shockwaveresponseofironbasedinsitumetallicglassmatrixcomposites AT graeveoliviaa shockwaveresponseofironbasedinsitumetallicglassmatrixcomposites AT hodgeandream shockwaveresponseofironbasedinsitumetallicglassmatrixcomposites AT eliassonveronica shockwaveresponseofironbasedinsitumetallicglassmatrixcomposites |