Cargando…

Is CXCL10/CXCR3 axis overexpression a better indicator of leprosy type 1 reaction than inducible nitric oxide synthase?

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Leprosy type 1 reactions (T1R) are acute episodes of immune exacerbation that are a major cause of inflammation and nerve damage. T1R are diagnosed clinically and supported by histopathology. No laboratory marker is currently available that can accurately predict a T1R....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Ira, Singh, Avninder, Mishra, Ashwani K., Singh, L.C., Ramesh, V., Saxena, Sunita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26831417
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.174554
_version_ 1782418848831504384
author Sharma, Ira
Singh, Avninder
Mishra, Ashwani K.
Singh, L.C.
Ramesh, V.
Saxena, Sunita
author_facet Sharma, Ira
Singh, Avninder
Mishra, Ashwani K.
Singh, L.C.
Ramesh, V.
Saxena, Sunita
author_sort Sharma, Ira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Leprosy type 1 reactions (T1R) are acute episodes of immune exacerbation that are a major cause of inflammation and nerve damage. T1R are diagnosed clinically and supported by histopathology. No laboratory marker is currently available that can accurately predict a T1R. Increased plasma and tissue expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (i-NOS) and chemokine CXCL10 have been demonstrated in T1R. We studied the gene expression and immunoexpression of i-NOS, CXCL10 and its receptor CXCR3 in clinically and histopathologically confirmed patients with T1R and compared with non-reactional leprosy patients to understand which biomarker has better potential in distinguishing reaction from non-reaction. METHODS: Gene expression of i-NOS, CXCL10 and CXCR3 was studied in 30 skin biopsies obtained from patients with borderline tuberculoid (BT), mid-borderline (BB) and borderline lepromatous (BL) leprosy with and without T1R by real-time PCR. Further validation was done by immunhistochemical expression on 60 borderline leprosy biopsies with and without T1R. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients histopathological evaluation confirmed T1R in 65 (54.2%) patients. CXCR3 gene expression was significantly (P<0.05) higher in BT- and BB-T1R patients compared to those without T1R. The CXCL10 gene expression was significantly higher (P<0.05) in BB leprosy with T1R but the difference was not significant in patients with BT with or without T1R. Immunoexpression for CXCR3 was significant in both BB-T1R and BB (P<0.001) and BT and BT-T1R (P<0.001). Immunoexpression of CXL10 was significant only in differentiating BB from BB-T1R leprosy (P<0.01) and not the BT cases. i-NOS immunoexpression was not useful in differentiating reactional from non-reactional leprosy. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Both CXCL10 and CXCR3 appeared to be useful in differentiating T1R reaction in borderline leprosy while CXCR3 alone differentiated BT from BT-T1R. CXCR3 may be a potentially useful immunohistochemical marker to predict an impending T1R.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4774065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47740652016-03-15 Is CXCL10/CXCR3 axis overexpression a better indicator of leprosy type 1 reaction than inducible nitric oxide synthase? Sharma, Ira Singh, Avninder Mishra, Ashwani K. Singh, L.C. Ramesh, V. Saxena, Sunita Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Leprosy type 1 reactions (T1R) are acute episodes of immune exacerbation that are a major cause of inflammation and nerve damage. T1R are diagnosed clinically and supported by histopathology. No laboratory marker is currently available that can accurately predict a T1R. Increased plasma and tissue expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (i-NOS) and chemokine CXCL10 have been demonstrated in T1R. We studied the gene expression and immunoexpression of i-NOS, CXCL10 and its receptor CXCR3 in clinically and histopathologically confirmed patients with T1R and compared with non-reactional leprosy patients to understand which biomarker has better potential in distinguishing reaction from non-reaction. METHODS: Gene expression of i-NOS, CXCL10 and CXCR3 was studied in 30 skin biopsies obtained from patients with borderline tuberculoid (BT), mid-borderline (BB) and borderline lepromatous (BL) leprosy with and without T1R by real-time PCR. Further validation was done by immunhistochemical expression on 60 borderline leprosy biopsies with and without T1R. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients histopathological evaluation confirmed T1R in 65 (54.2%) patients. CXCR3 gene expression was significantly (P<0.05) higher in BT- and BB-T1R patients compared to those without T1R. The CXCL10 gene expression was significantly higher (P<0.05) in BB leprosy with T1R but the difference was not significant in patients with BT with or without T1R. Immunoexpression for CXCR3 was significant in both BB-T1R and BB (P<0.001) and BT and BT-T1R (P<0.001). Immunoexpression of CXL10 was significant only in differentiating BB from BB-T1R leprosy (P<0.01) and not the BT cases. i-NOS immunoexpression was not useful in differentiating reactional from non-reactional leprosy. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Both CXCL10 and CXCR3 appeared to be useful in differentiating T1R reaction in borderline leprosy while CXCR3 alone differentiated BT from BT-T1R. CXCR3 may be a potentially useful immunohistochemical marker to predict an impending T1R. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4774065/ /pubmed/26831417 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.174554 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Ira
Singh, Avninder
Mishra, Ashwani K.
Singh, L.C.
Ramesh, V.
Saxena, Sunita
Is CXCL10/CXCR3 axis overexpression a better indicator of leprosy type 1 reaction than inducible nitric oxide synthase?
title Is CXCL10/CXCR3 axis overexpression a better indicator of leprosy type 1 reaction than inducible nitric oxide synthase?
title_full Is CXCL10/CXCR3 axis overexpression a better indicator of leprosy type 1 reaction than inducible nitric oxide synthase?
title_fullStr Is CXCL10/CXCR3 axis overexpression a better indicator of leprosy type 1 reaction than inducible nitric oxide synthase?
title_full_unstemmed Is CXCL10/CXCR3 axis overexpression a better indicator of leprosy type 1 reaction than inducible nitric oxide synthase?
title_short Is CXCL10/CXCR3 axis overexpression a better indicator of leprosy type 1 reaction than inducible nitric oxide synthase?
title_sort is cxcl10/cxcr3 axis overexpression a better indicator of leprosy type 1 reaction than inducible nitric oxide synthase?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26831417
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.174554
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaira iscxcl10cxcr3axisoverexpressionabetterindicatorofleprosytype1reactionthaninduciblenitricoxidesynthase
AT singhavninder iscxcl10cxcr3axisoverexpressionabetterindicatorofleprosytype1reactionthaninduciblenitricoxidesynthase
AT mishraashwanik iscxcl10cxcr3axisoverexpressionabetterindicatorofleprosytype1reactionthaninduciblenitricoxidesynthase
AT singhlc iscxcl10cxcr3axisoverexpressionabetterindicatorofleprosytype1reactionthaninduciblenitricoxidesynthase
AT rameshv iscxcl10cxcr3axisoverexpressionabetterindicatorofleprosytype1reactionthaninduciblenitricoxidesynthase
AT saxenasunita iscxcl10cxcr3axisoverexpressionabetterindicatorofleprosytype1reactionthaninduciblenitricoxidesynthase